Chinese probe crashes into moon

reply to post by IAF101


They might have a lot of mappings of the moon surface, but according to my research, a lot of the pictures are brushed in certain places, not to reveal some structures on the moon. There is a lot of stuff going on up there, like Americans mining on the surface, etc.

There is a lot we don't know, because secrets goverments (elites) do not want us to know!

Originally posted by teklordz

To call the crash "a controlled collision" sound very suspicious to me but in any case, interesting read..

It's typical commie speak for "Opps, we f#@*ed up and we are trying to hide our failures from you stinking capitalists pigs".

It's pretty common for commie regimes.

Anyway, at least they got pictures of the moon.

I sent the link of the article to John Lear... Wonder what he'll say about it all ... He'll probably talk about it in his next interview, either on project camelot or even maybe CMN (conscious media network)...


[edit on 1-3-2009 by teklordz]

Yes the people of India have made some big leaps in technology, it seems like they might pass us up on some of that.
We give it to everyone and they take it back home.
Didn't Yamamoto study at U.S university?

Originally posted by googolplex
Reality Check Da statement ring like a Bell would not mean they heard it, would mean it caused some sort of vibratory response, that was some how detected.

Ring 1
Definition: To cause to sound, especially by striking, as a metallic body; as, to ring a bell.

Ok now you tell me how and object made from solidified magma that is obviously solid to anextent is going to ring or vibrate. Alone by mass comparison it would be like hitting a bell at a cathedral with a toothpick.

Furthermore wouldn't this be recorded by astronomers world wide every time a space object both metal and non metallic hit the moon and wouldn't the vibrations have to be so intense for them even to be able to be recorded without causing significant damage to the moons current structure...

I also agree with everyone else that says this might be a cover up for faulty tech or just to eliminate secret components.

reply to post by TheDarkFlame


I'm not sure but they had a hard time detecting a large impact that hit I think around 1400 or 1500 A.D. .

They detected that it was still rocking back and forth from the very large impact. I think with mirror, they put on Moon and a laser.

And I was not the one that stated the bell thing, but if I remember it was NASA making some type of comparative analogy of impact.

Another thing to think about though, is that the Moon not only moves the Oceans when it moves around the Earth, it also moves the solid land masses to a much lesser degree.

Yea and China didn't want everyone to know about their three headed baby either. I would have kept him 3 heads are better than 1.



[edit on 2-3-2009 by googolplex]

[edit on 2-3-2009 by googolplex]

Moon impact was 1139? , not now proven caused rocking or caused by other impact.

www.answersincreation.org...

I have no reason to believe the core of the moon is solid.

Space may be airless but the moon isn't; it has a very small atmosphere.

The bell effect was a phrase used eons ago and whether it is audible or frequency (I assume the latter) the result is the same.

reply to post by TheDarkFlame


From what I understood NASA had placed seismic detectors on the moon to detect moonquakes. When the rocket booster impacted the surface the detectors picked up the vibrations for a long period of time.

The "ring like a bell" statement came from the fact that it vibrated so long.

Originally posted by LoneGunMan
reply to post by TheDarkFlame

 

From what I understood NASA had placed seismic detectors on the moon to detect moonquakes. When the rocket booster impacted the surface the detectors picked up the vibrations for a long period of time.

The "ring like a bell" statement came from the fact that it vibrated so long.

Yeah that was it exactly, the readings showed the vibrations resonated for some time after the impact, giving the impression it's hollow.

If you haven't already read it you should check out a book called 'Who Built the Moon', it's a great read which covers the hollow moon theory.

Both the Russians and the Americans messed up there first few probes which included probes crashing into the moon and some missing hopelessly to fly off into deep space. This is just the same.

It took a while for them to realise that calculations based on known physics and measurements didnt add up because the moon has a much stronger gravitational pull then is let on. It may take them a while.

reply to post by Jimbowsk


Here's the link to the book you talked about. Very interesting.
I think i'm gonna order the book. Thanks for the info
who built the moon

I'm very curios when we will be able to compare the suspicious events in the Moon with Chinese photos...

reply to post by rsousa


We'll need an inside leek to get access to these photos. Only time will tell, and we can only hope..

Didn't get an answer from John Lear yet, but i'll see when i come back from work later tonight...

The probe spent 494 days in space and completed its mission, its fairly routine for space agencies to "crash" their probes and such when the mission is over. They stated that it was to have lunar landing experience, this would give them large amounts of data about the surface conditions and gravitational influence that the moon had on the probe as it approached the surface.

Originally posted by TheDarkFlame


Reality check. Sound cannot be created in a vacuum. Thus an object hitting the moon would not produce any sound at all. Given the moon has an atmospheric mass of 104kg or something its ignorable.

Bigger reality check!

The ringing like a bell was a reference to vibrations from the impact which were recorded with seismic equipment that was left behind to find out if the moon had any natural seismic activity.

yes there is no sound but heavy vibrations, the vibrations supposedly reverberated several times from the impact



[edit on 2-3-2009 by SLAYER69]

Images show the lunar satellite breaking apart on impact.

www.informationweek.com...


Huh? Images from what?

Originally posted by teklordz
reply to post by IAF101

 

They might have a lot of mappings of the moon surface, but according to my research, a lot of the pictures are brushed in certain places, not to reveal some structures on the moon. There is a lot of stuff going on up there, like Americans mining on the surface, etc.

There is a lot we don't know, because secrets goverments (elites) do not want us to know!

The problem I have with this conspiracy theory about there being structures on the moon is that it is very flimsy claim to make. Even if you dont believe the pictures and maps that NASA has given out, the Russians and the Chinese would have exposed this a LONG time ago if it were the case, as they'd love to catch America with its pants down. Not to mention the fact that there are literally hundreds of astronomers on Earth who still study the moon through a variety of instruments ranging from X-rays telescopes to basic refractors. Now, with the Indian's up there as well we have yet again another independent party to verify any such speculation. Also, the Japanese probe Kaguya produced a detailed gravity map of the far side of the moon back in 2007. The sheer consistency in the data between so many different nations in so many different parameters should be quite conclusive.


[edit on 6-3-2009 by IAF101]

Many amateur astronomers have said they see stuff -- not necessarily permanent structures but what seems like moving machines and lights -- on the moon. However even if they exist they may be temporary so not necessarily part of official moon pics.

As Vallee found when he started studying UFOlogy, there's often a ton of stuff suppressed by tons of different 'authorities' because of its nature; perhaps that applies here too.

Lastly, if there really is someone present there who is not us, chances are they have technology and some 'in' inside our own systems (there are only so many world-class telescopes) to prevent the worst kind of exposure before its time.

Not saying any of that is so. I'm saying if the situation WERE so that there was someone living on the moon, then there are factors which could in fact make it difficult to demonstrate it. Rather like standing in your own light; if it's real, the IT could interfere with exposing that reality.

Best,
PJ