It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pteridine
Please also provide locations and final disposition of all aircraft and passengers on Flight 77
Originally posted by pteridine
How did the cab drive to the its staging position while impaled by a light post?
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Ligon
The physical evidence says a plane hit the Pentagon.
Originally posted by pteridine
Question the flight path if you wish, but the plane knocked over the light poles and hit the Pentagon
Originally posted by pteridine
and thousands of gallons of onboard fuel ignited. There is simply no evidence for anything else.
posted by pteridine
How did the cab drive to the its staging position while impaled by a light post?
posted by tezzajw
See, now you're thinking. That's what we would all like to know. How did Lloyde manage to drive that taxi with a light post through the windshield?
Remember, pteridine, there's only ONE person in the world who claims that a light pole went through the taxi window and that's Lloyde.
Google Video Link |
posted by pteridine
reply to post by matrixNIN11
The landing gear and engine found outside of E ring are evidence for a plane.
Originally posted by pteridine
Since you have all the answers, Tezzalini,
why don't you explain how the fuel deflagration and explosions were staged.
Originally posted by pteridine
Tezza,
Why do you think the diminutive was an insult?
Anyway, the way this works is that if you disagree with the government's story, then you must show evidence disproving it. If you cannot, then, by default, that story becomes the official story. If you have a theory for discussion, please post it.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Please, show me where the alleged wreckage has been forensically identified as belonging to flight AA77.
Originally posted by pteridine
Please show me where it has been forensically identified as belonging to to anything else.
Bodies were recovered from the aircraft
You were not present at the autopsies because the Feds feel that they do not have to satisfy the curiousity of an Australian high school student.
Originally posted by pteridine
The evidence is all in favor of an aircraft striking the Pentagon.
The information on recovered passenger bodies and personal effects is on the web but it may not be as forensically explicit as you would like. You'll have to make do.
If you are done trolling and have a theory of your own, state it so it can be debated.
Why do you continue to claim personal insult? I deduced your student status and youth from your avatar and "Wanting to be abducted!
Ready to psychic probe THEM!"
Surprisingly, the bravado of that statement belies your undue sensitivity. I will try to remember to be gentler with you.
Originally posted by tezzajw
This is a thread about the Pentagon not being hit by a plane. Read the thread's title, in case you've forgotten.
Alleged passenger bodies and alleged personal effects do not identify alleged plane wreckage to be that of AA77.
I'm waiting for the people who have evidence about Flight AA77 hitting the Pentagon to release it. Until then, the title of this thread is the only theory that needs to be discussed. The theory that Flight AA77 hit the Pentagon is sorely lacking evidence to prove it.
It shows how pathetically inaccurate your deducations are, pteridine, along with your readiness to break the terms and conditions of this website, when you choose to insult fellow members.
posted by D.Duck
Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001.
www.serendipity.li...
Originally posted by pteridine
All the physical evidence and witness accounts point to the flight 77 impact.
I believe that the case is now closed
You, on the other hand, only demand evidence of the plane strike to satisfy you at some high level of detail.
You have no alternate theory that you state other than "it didn't happen." As your postings say you are "trolling 10/10."
As to my sleuthing skills regarding you and attempting to determine your motivation, if not temporally correct, they are probably correct in spirit.
Your emotional outbursts show that I must be close, so perhaps I am not as incompetent and forgetful as you have been insinuating.