It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chucktah
I was reading earlier on the satellites that crashed, and they seemed confident that most likely any debris that flowed toward the earth would be burnt up in the atmosphere.
The resulting "unprecedented" debris field, says Lewis, is still being analysed by space agencies. But he expects it to create an extra 10,000 debris shards varying in size from centimetres to tennis-ball sized – more than triple the number created in the ASAT test.
"There was more energy here than in the Chinese ASAT test so it's possible we'll see more debris," Lewis says.
Nicholas Johnson, chief scientist for orbital debris at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, says the exact amount of debris generated in the collision depends on the geometry of the smashup, which is not yet known.
Originally posted by Chucktah
What I was wondering is how big, or dense does something have to be to enter the earths atmosphere and still have some remnants left over afterwards? Or is it mainly on the composition of the object?
Originally posted by C.H.U.D.
Crashing through tiles/roofing asphalt, then through a bit of rock-wool insulation and plaster board (ceiling) would hardly slow it, if it's anything like the house I live in now. Crashing through the floor would probably take a fair bit out of it, leaving the fridge to absorb most of what energy is left.
Having said all that, there is always a chance it fell from a plane too, although I'd be more inclined to stay with the machinery explanation going on what we know so far.