Ron Paul: They're working on a one world government

while you're right to some degree or rather I HOPE you end up being right IN THE END..when it really matters (i.e. at the 12th hour), but what will your little shotgun and infinite ammunition do against a SWAT team/home-land securing marine corps squad breaking through your door?

O! I don't know. Maybe the neighbors and I will on cue, turn on all the power in our home causing an overload surge which will blow all the units all the lines, like a lightning storm does to them sometimes, sending out a controlled EMP pulse, disabling all of their electronics on the land and in the air, temporarily buying 5 minutes where we are on equal footing. Gun to gun in the dark. And, no, night vision goggles won't work for them either due to the pulse.

Plenty of options.

Originally posted by tsloan
Just food for thought...Ever wonder .."why" a "central one world government"? If you move past trade issues and currency issues..."why" You want to unite a system to make it more stream line and stronger right? "why" What would one small group of super rich people have to gain over the "end game" the win, the final score of a world government? I mean in life you move on to the next level in board games...Whats the next level of a one world government? The preperation of a unified stronger system to accept and absorb into another unified system? We are building weapons that could level and kill off planets.....Who are we planning on using these weapons against? Each other?...No.. as crazy as some of these leaders are they all have one thing in common..the will to live? Come on people... A unified government that has super weapons and a desire to seek out space for knowledge???? I don't know...kinda sounds a little like all the stuff thats plastered all over the one communication media that has the most influences over the masses all over the world....The plan is being drawn right under your nose...just look past the slight of hand tricks...There is a purpose for all this. We might want to be part of a unified government body when it's all said and done cause what every they are planning for doesn't seem to be taken lighty for them to engineer a plan that has taken this long. Cause thats a lot of logistics to have world "enslavement" as the end game. They all ready have us if they really want that end, cause if the cops came and took your neighbor off to jail and you ask "why" they could say he was part of a international terrorist plot that launders money for them...you would never know any different...right? You might be shocked but would you really question it? So they have us already. They are planning something but for the logistics they have set in motion it's wayyyyyy beyond social control.

[edit on 25-2-2009 by tsloan]

Now you exit the realm of Property rights and transition to Population Control. They can't well round us all up and slaughter us. They would find their weapons and systems in our hands so fast they die of a heart attack before we could kill them. But, with Global Enslavement as an End Game, the total control to make the world and it's resources and systems fit your numbers model becomes a real feasability. Have you ever considered they think of you as cockroaches in the Ghetto?

Your rosy picture of space would be nice, however, it would have made more sense to admit to it and let the moment pass and organize people after their shock wears off. You really think their would be all out panic if people found out we had UFO's that could travel the oceans and space. Or that the existance of aliens would make people think anything more than well, if God can make life here, why not elsewhere, oh well we are all God's children? No. We know that, but, they make it look like the world agrees that we would all panic, leace our jobs, turn our back's on religion, yada, yada, yada. I'm sure disinformationalist's will respond in kind, but, any who say otherwise are in the minority. I for one would not freak out and so few that I know will be as shocked as to become hermit like monks.

Someone explain this to me in a U2U.

Where do people come up with the idea that a one world government instantaneously means death camps, global famine, 1984, global viral pandemics, raping of the young blah #en blah.

This civilization we are riding is #ed unless we do have a 1 world government. In a world wide government there will not be 1 person sitting on a throne made of 6 billion people, it will be the U.N. controlling everything in a very large council.

You want space age technology, you want a cleaner environment, you want deep space exploration and colonization. You want the end of hunger. You want a one world government. That will never happen when each small individual country is putting 50% of their resources into military funding.

Imagine resources from all over the world being pooled and dispersed evenly over the globe, instead of which country can snuggle up to the other countries the closest, and by snuggle i mean go into debt.

----------------------

you can call this disinformation or someone whos been drinking the kool-aid, but honestly, i think your all just scared your going to lose the individuality you purchased at wal-mart.

----------------------

just saddens me at this day in age, people want to be seperated. we can travel across the globe in 15 hours, but NO! NO!!! i dont want to share a country with them or a single global economy with them. when a one world government controls everything, it will be humankind. not

american
chinese
canadian
french
thai
mexican
native
indian
etc
etc

if you understand what im saying. im pretty lit.

---------------------------

How do we prevent this? First step is to understand what America is. America was formed by those escaping the tyranny of the majority and the unfair taxation in old Britain. America's foundation is our Constitution. If it is protected, we might survive this. If it is tossed aside, we might as well raise our white flags today. The Constitution protects our freedoms. Nothing else, nothing else in this world, has that power.

The day you hear that our Constitution has been dissolved is the day that the NWO has won. This will also be the day that a brand new revolution must and will inevitably begin.

Good luck to all.

ARTICLE 6 of the US CONSTITUTION

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

That means, we are made bound by the by This Constitution.
Not, this constitution
This CONSTITUTION
Or, THIS CONSTITUTION

And we are bound by the Laws
Not laws
Not LAWS

And we are bound by Laws of the United States
Not by Laws of the united states
Not by Laws of the United STATES
Not by Laws of the UNITED STATES

And the Laws of the United States must be in Pursuance to This Constitution
Not in pursuance
Not in PURSUANCE
Not IN PURSUANCE

Also, it says United States
Not united states of america
Not United States of America
Not United States of AMERICA
Not UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Here's a good source of Laws we are bound to, and I'd look at all the Treaties prior to and following This Constitution: avalon.law.yale.edu...

Now, here's a summary of legal terms:

Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines
Capitalize adj. as. "To take advantage of - To use to ones
own advantage."

Blacks Law Dictionary • Revised 4th Edition 1968,
provides a more comprehensive definition as follows .
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status
through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A
diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or
curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal
attributes and qualifications.

Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss
of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John
Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss
of status. This occurred where a man's family relations
alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation
[pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui
juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or
upon the emancipation of one who had been under the
patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of
liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2,
3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.

Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of
status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John
DOE) - A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred
where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without
losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss
of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN
DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most
comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's
condition was changed from one of freedom to one of
bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it
all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

Diminutio. Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away;
loss or depravation.
Capite. - Lat. By the head.

Any Laws, Treaties, or Amendments to This Constitution stiled THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , made that were made under the Corporate header or stile of the UNITED STATES or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are not Constitutional under the Legal Terms of This Constitution.
However, as it was Esquire's (Crown Templar Bar) Lawyer's of the Crown who wrote it all, I'm not surprised to find that the Judges, not th judges, not the JUDGES, and not THE JUDGES (Ie: JUDGE X.X.X.) are not bound by This Constitution,etc.. Hence they instead are bound in this wise: by "any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary "

People should always look close at the fine print.

So, if it was stiled or the names, or titles of the judge, constitution or united states was written in anything but Capitis Diminutio Minima, then it is not legal under This Constitution. The Judge is bound, not Bound, not BOUND, by anything in reverse of these things in Capitis Diminutio Minima, no other Capitas was either used or mentioned in this Article, all things in law being equitable and reversable, but, they cannot legislate. They approve such things as Law as is their power, but ruling it law, or LAW, is beyond their power. However, We The People are not bound to them.

Notice it is the supreme, not Supreme, not SUPREME, therefore, Justice Marshall was in error when he declared that only the SUPREME COURT can interpret the Constitution and say what Law is. In fact, legally, by This Constitution, the SUPREME COURT, and the Supreme Court, and the supreme COURT have no jurisdiction or authority.

Translation: only the sui jurist can say what This Constitution is interpreted to mean and what the Law of the Land is. Since all politicians are CORPORATE ENTITIES, Ie: JOHN Q. or SUZIE Q. CITIZEN, they are not sui jurist. whereas i am john q. or suzie q. citizen i am sui jurist and therefore have authority to judge, should i be declared by my fellow sui jurists to be a Judge or Law Giver, under Canon Law ie: the Hebrew Canon Law on which the founding documents were based.

as my signature does and always had included the legal affirmation A.R.R., which includes All RIGHTS, and All Rights, and all rights, i retain all rights as a sui jurist, even when i use capitalism.
They will lie and tell you that such things are word games and that they are not there to debate the law with you, but, in fact, they are there for just that. If you don't debate law, Law, LAW in a court, Court, COURT, then where do you debate it and why are they even there, if it's all set in stone? They forget, they are there to PROVE THAT THE LORD BE FIRST SERVED. ALL CAPS MEAN THEY SERVE- i am served, not SERVANT

[edit on 26-2-2009 by PhyberDragon]

reply to post by vcwxvwligen


Our country can afford to send people to "any" camps man.....WERE BROKE brother. Whos going to pay in to keep these camps going


I went to buy a coffee this morning gave the 1.00 at the 7-11 and he said...hmmm..Got another .25? I said it's 1.00 has been since I moved here 4 years ago...He said.."inflation"..lol no kidding...

Has anyone considered there could be TWO elite groups vying for a new world order?

WHAT IF the one power block that has recently become more influential than the United States decided that enough is enough, we are NOT going to let these Americans ruin any more of the global financial system, we are NOT going to let their arrogant and hostile worldwide actions lead us closer to WW III, we will NOT be humiliated at home and have our economies destroyed at their whims any longer, WHAT IF Europe says: ENOUGH!

Would that cause a major power struggle behind the scenes at these summits? What will be discussed at this weekends summit with Angela Merkel, Gordon brown, Sarkozy.... are you all sure you are looking in the right direction when you are looking for danger?

Don't the Europeans have their own ideas on how to rule the world? Are they happy to allow the US to blithely and arrogantly blunder their way into worldwide catastrophe? Is this what Ron Paul is referring to when he alludes to a power struggle?

Originally posted by Jazzyguy

Perhaps that is where Glen Beck comes in. He's a fresh face with a new spin, not that different from Ron, only younger.

Every body makes good points now & then.

I used to listen to Glenn Beck occasionally - - I got bored and there is something arrogant about him.

I mostly read now (better to not be affected by a personality) - - I also like Link TV and foreign news shows.

Originally posted by BooBetty
Has anyone considered there could be TWO elite groups vying for a new world order

I doubt the NWO is country vs country.

Its money/corporate based. In my opinion.

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Been following these link on "Above Top", for awhile now. Just wanted to give some additional food for thought regarding this topic. Nobody has brought up the fact that in order for the U.S. / World Government to pull this off (which I personally do believe is an on going process), they would have to have the our military in their pocket. Having been both enlisted and an officer in the U.S.A.F. and Army, I can assure you, a majority of my military brothers have a very health disdain for the political elite. There have always been a handful of upper echelon hacks (individuals like Gen Clark and Powell) who would follow orders to kill U.S. citizens. As a volunteer force, we are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If these clowns actually do try to usper the Constitution, there will be hell to pay. Additionally, I have a number of relatives that are fairly high up in various Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, their stance is no differenct than mine. Keep in mind 80% of the U.S. Military voted against the current administration. What you have to watch out for is a gutting of our military, to the point we could not effectively protect the country, if massive unrest did developed either internally or externally. Don't give up on the troops, Most of us serving believe in God, Family, and Country, in that order. If the elites try to take away any of these, they will be eventually removed from the gene pool, if push comes to shove.

"Spies For Hire" by Tim Shorrock.

Along with:

"Corporate Warriors" and "Wired for War" by Peter Singer

These three books should be enough to assure any well meaning patriot that their best intentions are well and truly irrelevant.

Well over 70% of ALL intelligence gathering, personal, resource procurement and supplying is done by the private sector. In fact the entire defence and intelligence gathering programme was completely outsourced in 2007 - the decisions are made by associated board of industry and government leaders with primary decisions bhelpd by the big 5. (Boeng, Raytheon etc).

You have been sold out - you are already owned and controlled completely and entirely by forces other than those your believe you serve. FACT.

Read these books, they are authoritative and very well respected, best in field.

best of luck to all.

I do have to ask this probably crazy question: is it really that bad to have a one world gov't and/or one banking system? It might make more sense if we all worked together and had similar currency systems, etc. Now granted, our founding fathers purposely set up 3 branches of gov't for the whole checks-and-balance theory, so that no one part could become tyrannical. But I struggle to find why this one-world concept is so bad? Help me understand?

Alot of people think that this nwo or world government is the agenda of trilateral commissions/rockefella, basically people who are as right wing as you can get. I have also read before that there were plans to denounce the dollar in favour of having a global currency/banking system. I'd be willing to bet that theres no doubt the mastermind behind barack obama (brzezinski) is all for having the US in controll of this world banking system, if that happens it effectively means these people would basically have controll of the world (being in controll of the world banks means controlling resources, the military etc.) Its also interesting how brzezinski directly profited from the destruction of the worlds financial structure. Having a world government can be very dangerous indeed. Especially when some one such as brzezinski is at the helm (a man one waged war on blacks in the US, funded Al-Qaeda and doesnt mind dabbling in eugenics)

Originally posted by rufusdrak
but what will your little shotgun and infinite ammunition do against a SWAT team/home-land securing marine corps squad breaking through your door?

They will do a hell of a lot more than accompanying them to the furnace or taking your cyanide pill like a coward...

Everyone needs to put their fear aside and go down like men...(or women)
Better to die standing than to live on your knees!

Do as my grandfather taught me, I wont be disappointed if ya die, as long as you get one before you go!
1 for 1... the majority always wins

To all the stupid wacko liberal democrat's that voted for Obama because they thought Republican's were all for a "One world Government."

You were wrong! And we are now paying for your stupidity for voting for these far left Liberals!!!

You constantly hounded the Bush administration, and Cheney for pushing a new world order or "One world Government."

Well, well, well. While the Democrat's are changing this country into a socialist state, nationalizing banks, health care, and automotive industry they are now talking about a one world monetary system.

Thanks for being STUPID!