It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rickyrrr
reply to post by TheMythLives
In light of the fact that the planet earth contains enough nuclear weapons to wipe itself from the face of itself fifty times over, why would it matter whether or not weather control is possible?
-rrr
Originally posted by doctordoom
This thread is much appreciated by me.
Cloud seeding is a huge money making business that has gotten out of hand.
It's whats killing the birds
It's whats killing the bees
It's whats killing the trees.
It will kill us.
Originally posted by doctordoom
Cloud seeding is a huge money making business that has gotten out of hand.
It's whats killing the birds
It's whats killing the bees
It's whats killing the trees.
It will kill us.
Originally posted by spinkyboo
A little on HAARP AND WEATHER CONTROL.
Keep in mind that there are HAARP and HAARP-like facilities all over the world.
SO we are not relying on the little one in Alaska to do allof the dirty work.
www.cidpusa.org...
To stall global warming for 20 years, one climate scientist proposed lobbing sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere, which would work in concert with cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. The sulphur dioxide, a pollutant on Earth, would form sulphate aerosol particles to shade the planet, much as the ash clouds from a major volcanic eruption do, said Tom Wigley of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research.
The idea of injecting sulphates into the stratosphere, some 16 kilometres above the Earth's surface, was first proposed and quickly rejected three decades ago as a dangerous tinkering with natural processes. But Wigley said he was prompted to pursue this angle when Paul Crutzen, a Nobel-winning atmospheric chemist, recently suggested a new look at the notion of geoengineering, as this notion is known.
The most sensible way to get sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere would be to send numerous planes - more than the world's current commercial airline fleet - to take it there. This might cost hundreds of millions of dollars, he said. The sulphur dioxide would form small sulphuric acid aerosol droplets. Another method to get these aerosols into the air is the possible addition of sulphur compounds to airplane fuel, which would then form sulphur dioxide, Wigley said. On Earth, sulphur dioxide contributes to respiratory illness, aggravates heart and lung disease and contributes to acid rain. Power plants and other factories are the biggest producers. But Wigley said the amount of sulphur dioxide needed for the geoengineering project would probably cause negligible pollution down on Earth's surface, because his model called for less than 10% additional sulphur dioxide than is emitted by the burning of fossil fuels. The technology exists now to put this plan into effect, but studies of economic feasibility are needed, he said.
What meteorologists and the media are not telling you The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), will provide to anyone that requests the list, a copy of experimental weather modification programs ongoing (as well as historical), in the United States. This list is not complete due to the fact that many experimental weather modification programs are “classified top secret” by the U.S. military.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Originally posted by spinkyboo
A little on HAARP AND WEATHER CONTROL.
Keep in mind that there are HAARP and HAARP-like facilities all over the world.
SO we are not relying on the little one in Alaska to do allof the dirty work.
www.cidpusa.org...
Why don't you put up a link to the actual HAARP page as well?
www.haarp.alaska.edu...
Weather control, as well as "weather tampering", for hostile or military purposes is expressly forbidden dating from at least December 10, 1976, when the "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques" was adopted. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.
The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD
Convention) is an instrument of international disarmament law specifically intended to protect the environment in the event of
armed conflict. It prohibits hostile use of the environment as a means of warfare.
The project is funded by the Office of Naval Research and jointly managed by the ONR and Air Force Research Laboratory, with the principal involvement of the University of Alaska. Fourteen other universities and educational institutions have been involved in the development of the project and its instruments, namely the University of Alaska, Penn State University (ARL), Boston College, UCLA, Clemson University, Dartmouth College, Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Maryland, College Park, University of Massachusetts, MIT, Polytechnic University, Stanford University, and the University of Tulsa.
For years, no military program has sparked more fevered speculation from conspiracy theorists than the mysterious High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP. And for years, the Pentagon has been pooh-poohing speculation that the enormous collection of transmitters, radars, and magnetometers in Alaska was some sort of superweapon.
But, it turns out, the conspiracy theorists may not have been entirely off-base, after all.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by BlasteR
BlastR, have you ever gone to the annual open house the Alaskan HAARP facility holds every summer?
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
The correct term for your subject is "scaler weapons". And no, global warming is not a hoax, it is real and far more dangerous than they lead you to believe.
Xmen