It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
CIA is staying the same. They are actually following the Bush Doctrine!
Change supports - 0 Bush - 1
Gitmo is actually getting worse! Not better but worse!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 2
Obama is sending another 75 BILLION to Iraq and Afghanistan!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 3
Bailing out the Banks? Bush did it and Obama follows!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 4
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by northof8
Right out of the play book. Take facts, distort them, and have no care for honesty.
CIA is staying the same. They are actually following the Bush Doctrine!
Change supports - 0 Bush - 1
False.
Gitmo is actually getting worse! Not better but worse!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 2
False? He's closing it, last I heard.
Obama is sending another 75 BILLION to Iraq and Afghanistan!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 3
Love the trickery there. He is taking troops FROM Iraq, and filtering them TO Afghanistan.
He's always said he was going to do this, only liberals and conservatives who didn't actually keep up with the candidates are caught off guard by this.
Bailing out the Banks? Bush did it and Obama follows!
Change Supporters - 0 Bush - 4
Can't really change something that isn't old. This started just as he was being elected, so it doesn't really fit. Let me put it this way:
It's not a Bush policy that people really cared to have "changed".
That all you got? Not one of those accusations was even true.
[edit on 2/25/2009 by Irish M1ck]
Originally posted by The Cyfre
reply to post by Irish M1ck
This thread is a good example of what the GOP has been experiencing now for a couple of years. The opposition to Obama in this thread is composed of half-truths and mockery, but nothing of any real substance.
According to a lawyer who represents Guantanamo detainees, abuse of prisoners has worsened significantly since Obama won the election. Guards want to "get their kicks in" before the camp closes, said British lawyer Ahmed Ghappour, who represents 31 detainees.
Originally posted by northof8
Wait a minute here... If I am not mistaken this thread was started by an Obama supporter was it not?
Originally posted by northof8
The simple fact is that these Obamanation supporters voted for change but we didn't get change did we? The Chosen One is following the Bush Doctrine on everything and changing very little.
Originally posted by northof8
With Bush it was what it was. You lefties hated that. Obama is doing the same exact thing but calling it Change and you can't wrap your little liberal minds around that. It is for the same reason you support him now that you voted for him before.
Originally posted by northof8
The problem is you liberals have no capacity to think and when we call you on it... Or Mock you as you say you throw a childish tantrum.
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by northof8
You serious? Did you even read the Gitmo source:
According to a lawyer who represents Guantanamo detainees, abuse of prisoners has worsened significantly since Obama won the election. Guards want to "get their kicks in" before the camp closes, said British lawyer Ahmed Ghappour, who represents 31 detainees.
What about that is Obama's fault? Shouldn't you be upset with the military for training a bunch of idiots?
As for the WSJ article, until you can point to Obama and say that he led the nation to war under false pretenses, lied about domestic spying, and lied about torturing, then I don't think you can compare the policies to Bush.
YES, much of Obama's policies are going to be the same, because not EVERY one of Bush's policies was bad.
Originally posted by theWCH
This idea that Obama is a socialist is really baffling. I mean, the man was a faculty member at the University of Chicago, which is the Mecca of free-market intellectualism. Have you people looked at his economic advisers? Obama is essentially a libertarian-paternalist, and Austan Goolsbee has had a major hand in shaping social policy ideas. These guys are ideologically in favor of small-government, lower taxes, the power of markets; and, they see the potential to use market-based incentives to bring about positive social outcomes. This is what he meant with the "change" slogan -- he's ushering in new ideas that hadn't made it to the rest of Washington yet. As an added bonus, he's a Constitutional Lawyer, so he was already on board with fewer federal mandates and more freedom of states to make decisions (see: allowing States to set their own emission and mileage standards).
Oh, and yes I obviously knew why I was voting for him: from a Libertarian standpoint, he was the least offensive candidate (face it, Congress won't allow the IRS to be shut down, so a Ron Paul Presidency would have been four years of futility). And in case anybody missed it earlier: "Change" basically boils down to bringing cutting-edge Behavioural Economics to government policy -- anybody who actually pays attention would know this.
[edit on 26-2-2009 by theWCH]