It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
Originally posted by bskivss3
Another question... What was the date & time of the alleged indecent?
We were standing, there was only 1. It could have been someone playing a really good prank on me, but the invisibility sold it for me. Either that or someone's got hold of some beta-tech from somewhere!!! I am not sure exactly how long the encounter was, it seemed to go "forever" as I was so overwhelmed? Anyway, jan 11th, ~1:30am. Good stargazing, and I'm a night owl.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by benjiskylar
So, are you claiming to understand the gravitational pull of a planet we do not know the size of (I am guessing that it is smaller than purported as we survive) and made of some sort of invisible, as-yet-to-be-identified matter?
Yes, I am.
When Uranus was discovered, astronomers could see that it was being perturbed. Because of that, they were able to determine another planet lay beyond Uranus. Despite not being able to see it (or in other words, it was invisible to them) and not knowing the composition of the planet, they knew it was out there due to the effect it had on Uranus.
Again, we don't have to see the planet or know its compsition to see the effects it will have on other bodies in the solar system. And yet somehow we see no such effects from Nibiru, despite the fact it will be on top of us in just three years, both minute on an astronomical scale.
The way I see it, it explains everything. We will be able to detect it (to prepare) but it won't be visible to normal instruments. I make no claims about the planets size, or its composition. I have no idea whether the composition dampens gravitational effects, but can only assume that as there haven't been any major anomalies detected that it must (or I have been deceived). I don't see how as a man of science you can make a prediction about such a scenario, other than using occams razor to say I am wrong.
Originally posted by AlienCarnage
reply to post by ::.mika.::
Your statement was and I quote
never forget that the only benefit that science brings to humanity is by proving that the previous science was wrong, erroneous and incorrect.
Which was depicting science as a whole not just Physics, and that prompted my reply.
Now in relating to Physics what has been written is just our current understanding of it and books on the subject are rewritten evertime we compile enough new data that outdates the old. So in this Physics would fit your comment, but not Science as a whole. There are many more parts to science other than physics.
(can you teach saviorcomplex some basics about ideas debating ? i mean this guy doesn't want to be mistaken with a disinfo bull#ter still he's acting exactly as if he was one ! yeah savcomp, you're easy to spot man...)
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
.
Again, we don't have to see the planet or know its compsition to see the effects it will have on other bodies in the solar system. And yet somehow we see no such effects from Nibiru, despite the fact it will be on top of us in just three years, both minute on an astronomical scale.
Originally posted by AlienCarnage
reply to post by ::.mika.::
I am not going to debate about science and throw this thead any more than it already is and get Mod Edited I will save that debate for a thead particularly relating to Science.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
Originally posted by bskivss3
Guys Guys and Gals,
Do not change the subject of this spectacle now. Nine out of ten of us dont give a rats ass about planetary pull. This is about contact from "a NEW race".
Where in the Solar System did they say they/him were from?
They said it is a planet we haven't detected yet. I don't know much about astronomy (still learning with my new meade) so didn't ask much about that.