It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
You seem to have come out of the encounter with a spelling deformity.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by benjiskylar
Well, I don't claim to understand the gravitational effects of particles we are yet to understand.
We have a good understanding of how large objects such as planets affect other planets and objects in the solar system. It's called Perturbation. It is how we discovered Neptune, by observing the orbit of Uranus was perturbed by a then hithertofor undiscovered body.
If Nibiru is just three years away, why have we not seen a perturbance of any other body in the solar system?
You seem to have come out of the encounter with a spelling deformity.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by benjiskylar
You seem to have come out of the encounter with a spelling deformity.
Considering you are trying to convince people that you spoke to aliens, you might want to lay off insulting other members mental abilities.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
So, are you claiming to understand the gravitational pull of a planet we do not know the size of (I am guessing that it is smaller than purported as we survive) and made of some sort of invisible, as-yet-to-be-identified matter?
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by benjiskylar
So, are you claiming to understand the gravitational pull of a planet we do not know the size of (I am guessing that it is smaller than purported as we survive) and made of some sort of invisible, as-yet-to-be-identified matter?
Yes, I am.
When Uranus was discovered, astronomers could see that it was being perturbed. Because of that, they were able to determine another planet lay beyond Uranus. Despite not being able to see it (or in other words, it was invisible to them) and not knowing the composition of the planet, they knew it was out there due to the effect it had on Uranus.
Again, we don't have to see the planet or know its compsition to see the effects it will have on other bodies in the solar system. And yet somehow we see no such effects from Nibiru, despite the fact it will be on top of us in just three years, both minute on an astronomical scale.
He said I was making up a story, and he mocked me. I apologise for my quip.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by benjiskylar
So, are you claiming to understand the gravitational pull of a planet we do not know the size of (I am guessing that it is smaller than purported as we survive) and made of some sort of invisible, as-yet-to-be-identified matter?
Yes, I am.
When Uranus was discovered, astronomers could see that it was being perturbed. Because of that, they were able to determine another planet lay beyond Uranus. Despite not being able to see it (or in other words, it was invisible to them) and not knowing the composition of the planet, they knew it was out there due to the effect it had on Uranus.
Again, we don't have to see the planet or know its compsition to see the effects it will have on other bodies in the solar system. And yet somehow we see no such effects from Nibiru, despite the fact it will be on top of us in just three years, both minute on an astronomical scale.
Originally posted by AlienCarnage
reply to post by benjiskylar
He said I was making up a story, and he mocked me. I apologise for my quip.
All of the stuff you wrote has been talked about extensively in many forums on ATS, you offered no "Inside Info" that would help you convince anyone that this encounter actually happened. The invisible cloth thing . . . already invented, LHC been discussed to death in many forums as well as gravitaional enomilies, 2012 info is everwhere on ATS. No other tech to go on, not even a picture . . . yes you stated they wouldn't let you take one, and that if you did it wouldn't show up anyway, this however this would be the typical story you get where there was not actually an encounter.
Do you see how the info you provided gives no help to prove your story or at least show it is nothing more than either a wild dream or just a wild story?
[edit on 2/19/2009 by AlienCarnage]
Originally posted by bskivss3
Guys Guys and Gals,
Do not change the subject of this spectacle now. Nine out of ten of us dont give a rats ass about planetary pull. This is about contact from "a NEW race".
Where in the Solar System did they say they/him were from?
Originally posted by benjiskylar
The way I see it, it explains everything. We will be able to detect it (to prepare) but it won't be visible to normal instruments. I make no claims about the planets size, or its composition. I have no idea whether the composition dampens gravitational effects, but can only assume that as there haven't been any major anomalies detected that it must (or I have been deceived).
Originally posted by bskivss3
Do not change the subject of this spectacle now. Nine out of ten of us dont give a rats ass about planetary pull.
Originally posted by benjiskylar
The way I see it, it explains everything. We will be able to detect it (to prepare) but it won't be visible to normal instruments...
Originally posted by h3akalee
Just incase you did not see it he said he is not asking for anyone to beleive him.