Does Michelle O's pose on Vogue indicate New False Flag Attack on March 10?

reply to post by Salt of the Earth


I dont mean this in a bad way salt, but if you are serious you need to seek help. I mean in all honesty I can say this is the most rediculous post I have ever seen on here. I know I have said that before, but it baffles me that any sane person could actually come up with a crazy theory like this. So let me guet this straight. Vogue is the devils magazine. Why because of Anna Wintour is the editor. And the film the devil wears prada is based on her.

Wintour is also a noted philanthropist. She serves as a trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.[23] Wintour began the CFDA/Vogue Fund in order to encourage, support and mentor unknown fashion designers. She has also raised over $10 million for AIDS charities since 1990, by organizing various high profile benefits

Yup she is definately doing Satans work! Or maybe it is because she likes to wer fur. Perhaps it is because she supported Obama, he is the anti-christ after all. Just because she is a bitch and people hate her doesnt mean she is Satan or one of Satan's minions. At any rate I hope you are kidding about this. If not, seek help. You shouldnt be allowed to roam the streets alone.

That severity thing just makes me think she's a severe woman. And she is. God, I want to restructure her eyebrows so she looks less angry. They are too pointy and they look terrible on her.

reply to post by Salt of the Earth


Well I can tell you are really convinced of all this stuff.

Did you see that Denzel Washington movie where that guy is propelled into the office of presidency at all costs? I can't remember the name of it but at the time I remember thinking how that kind of thing doens't really happen. I am trying to become more open to believing the unbelieveable.

Originally posted by rufusdrak
I'm surprised at some of you thinking that the diablo symbol is a 'natural' way for the hand to hang and that it's pure coincidence that Michelle Obama has her hand that way, amongst other suggestive things like "First Lady The World's Been Waiting For" etc...

I suppose the freemason/illuminati founding fathers and such also "mistakenly" sculpted the Statue of Liberty's hand with the diablo symbol as well? (as well as the illuminati eye-pyramid on the dollar bill etc, etc)

Oh my god, what in the world are you talking about?

You call THAT a "diablo handsign?"

Talk about reaching.

Also, I'm not an expert on the statue of liberty, but I would guess that it would be pretty tough to prove that it was built and designed by "freemasons." I'm pretty sure it was given to the U.S. by the country of France or something like that.

reply to post by Bombeni


You're thinking of Manchurian Candidate. It was kind of a lame movie, all things considered, but a nice conspiracy theory.

It is true this hand signal is flashed and usually 97 % of the time they are in the Illuminati and they are showing their loyalty and thanks, If people question it and shoot it down as rubbish then why are they on this site. People are stating the truth so I guess the Illuminity have people whos job is to question the truth and make it look false. The conspiracy goes way deeper that you can ever imagine.

I just want to thank all of you for your great posts, especially the ones who put up the pictures, like the Statue of Liberty one. Yes, it was a Freemason who designed and built that.

I so appreciate the photos that you are putting up. I need help from my IT person to figure that one out. This thread would have been 100 percent better if the pics had been posted at the beginning. One picture is definitely worth a thousand words.

Could somebody pull up the graphic I posted in response to the person wanting more information on the Seinfeld shows involvement in Cabalism? Post the whole thing up here? Is that possible? I'm particularly interested in the pic of the Satanist woman who was arrested for murder. I'd like you to notice the eyebrows, the painted on eyebrows, just a thin line drawn in that scowl.

It looks just like Michelle's painted on scowl and also Condi's.

Something wrong with this picture.

Also, please don't forget the main point I'm bringing up here, which has not been discussed at all -- namely, that an occultic person claims the Vogue magazine is sending an occultic message of big warlike killing event on March 10. And that this, taken together with Texe Marrs' warning last week on his radio message that he believes the Jewish holiday of Purim (March 10) will bring on a big warlike attack of some sort also. (I'm not overlooking a bird flu spray-down, or a big earthquake (man-made set off by HAARP) or some other "natural" disaster.)

Any occultics reading this thread who might have some more insight into that magazinecover and could lend some insight to this -- be glad to get your input!

Let's see. As I pull out the copy of Morals and Dogma a Mason sent me, leet's look at some of the those quotes:

The next statement reduces the Masonic philosophy to a single premise. Pike writes: "The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god...
Lucifer, the Light Bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light...Doubt it not!"

That's two separate quotes, far apart in the book.

Excerpt from Chapter 29: Grand Pontiff
The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired.

It's true, Lucifer IS a strange name to give the Prince of Darkness.
And it became such because of the KJV of the Bible. Fellow translating it didn't like St. Lucifer, and every instance of Light Bearer (save for a few in reference to Jesus) was translated to Lucifer.
It was not in reference to Satan, however, but to the King of Tyre, and his fall from grace.

From Chapter 3: The Master
For the Initiates, this is not a Person, but a Force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or Free Will. They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythologic and horned form of the God PAN; thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the Light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend.

Again, stating that the image we have of Satan as Lucifer, and the images associated with him, are not the real Satan, but much the result of Christianity demonizing religions. The original belief of Satan held that he tested people, he was not necessarily evil, but instead presented challenges to believers in God.

Now, as for the rest of your quotes, they were to butchered to be able to pull up in my copy, but running a search through Google brought up a previous thread on the topic here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I have to ask, seeing how either you or a source pasted these peices of quotes together, did you actually read the book, or ar taking someone else's words for whats in it?

[edit on 18-2-2009 by RuneSpider]

reply to post by RuneSpider


I quoted the website where I took the quote. Did you check it out? It was all about Albert Pike, who Albert Pike is, what he said. Why would Albert Pike be tooting the horn for the King of Tyre? Did the king of Tyre have built in tabrets and all that as described in the Bible? You don't believe that heads of state have personal demons set over them, to control and energize them -- as Daniel describes when Michael was held up by one such high ranking demon?

No, I don't own Morals and Dogma and I've not read the whole thing cover to cover. I am a Christian and know my Bible pretty well. Some religions I've gone into depth about -- Catholicism and Mormonism and Islam, for example. Lately I've been studying up on the Talmud and Cabala. At this point in my life, I don't do much original research but rely on people I trust, whose conclusions on things I have actually researched in depth match mine. It is impossible for one person to know everything, or even to want to.

Have you ever watched the Lightbringers, Emissaries of Jahbulon online?
video.google.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

I know the Freemasons are wicked, that the skull and bones is one of the symbols on their aprons they wear, which means you people are pirates. I know the Freemasons think Satan is the good guy, the one who gives all the power and money and fame in this world, which you are trying to convince me in your postings. And that the Bible is wrong, and on and on. Fine. You have chosen the dark side. You contradict yourself.

If you are such an expert on the occult, what do you have to say about Michelle Obama's pose on Vogue as to giving occultic message of a terror attack or some terrible loss of life from a "natural" disaster, something bad, on March 10? Or is it too secret for you to discuss your illuminated understandings, and only for the initiated?




[edit on 18-2-2009 by Salt of the Earth]

I am amused.

I am not concerned.

f you are such an expert on the occult, what do you have to say about Michelle Obama's pose on Vogue as to giving occultic message of a terror attack or some terrible loss of life from a "natural" disaster, something bad, on March 10? Or is it too secret for you to discuss your illuminated understandings, and only for the initiated?

Oh for Pete's sake. I'm not a mason.
I think you are reading to much in a magazine cover. I think that your trusted sources are biased, and that you are showing that you've never actually looked at Morals and Dogma, in which Pike goes to state fairly often that a Mason must put Masonry behind his other duties.

reply to post by RuneSpider


Since you're not a mason but the masons like and trust you enough to lend you their Morals and Dogma book (from what I understand, that is a high honor, that most of them don't even own it until they get high enough) --

can you ask any of your Freemason friends what they think about the cover of Vogue with MO on it regarding the March 10 thing?

Thanks so much for whatever you can do. March 10 is coming up. It would be nice to get another occultic's opinion on that cover.

Texe Marrs' assessment of March 10 has to do with the Jewish holiday of Purim, which he says is a prime date to launch a new war attack or false flag. Considering that we've been told by Colin Powell, Joe Biden and Madeline Albright that there would be a huge attack right after Obama is elected (how do THEY know these things?) -- I am concerned that we may really see something happen in March, specifically March 10.

I'm not joking about this. I'm sure none of these people are up to any good -- (Biden, et al). Biden has been compared to a mafia don when it comes to the international criminal cabal that is running the governments of the world in collaboration with the foreign banksters.

reply to post by Salt of the Earth


Statue of Liberty hand is interesting. I can almost buy that she is flashing the el diablo sign. MO, not so much. If nothing happens on March 10th will you come back and admit you were wrong about the El Diablo sign and your prediction? Edit to add. You do realize that the same symbol also mean I love you. That is the sign for the deaf. What if that is what both the Statue Of Liberty and MO are flashing that sign for?

[edit on 18-2-2009 by tide88]

Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by Salt of the Earth

 

Statue of Liberty hand is interesting. I can almost buy that she is flashing the el diablo sign. MO, not so much. If nothing happens on March 10th will you come back and admit you were wrong about the El Diablo sign and your prediction?

I hope I am wrong. I've not made the predictions. Two other people made them, five if you count Colin Powell, Joe Biden and Madeline Albright -- although they said the attack would happen in January.

Texe Marrs says, based on past events, based on the eagerness of the Zionist neocons to go to war, to attack Iran, to wipe out the Gazans, to expand the war into Russia and Pakistan (which we are already into it now in Pakistan), that the tradition of having mass attacks beginning on Jewish holidays, that Purim is a major holiday of celebration of the death of Israel's enemies that it is a particularly auspicious and favored time to start a war, or a false flag attack take your pick, and Purim is March 10 -- I do listen to Texe. Texe knows more about the occult and the NWO than maybe anybody alive.

The Golden Dawn poster from Alex Jones' forums who posted the stuff I put up at the beginning when I started this thread interpreting the Vogue mag cover of MO set some bells ringing which is why I posted this thread. The AJ poster said there are a lot of occultic messages on that cover, aside from or in addition to and in conjunction with the el diablo. He said March 10, big death and destruction.

March 10.

If March 10 comes and goes with no harm, I will rejoice. The more we take notice to what the Satanic Zionists are doing, the less likely they are to do it.

BTW, anybody here aware of the USS Liberty and the false flag attack on that ship under LBJ's watch by Israel, how they bombed and straffed our ship for three solid hours, that our guys were waving white flags, and there was no way the Israelis didn't know they were attacking an American ship? That they were in league with LBJ and the plan was to sink the ship, to kill every one of the men on that ship, and blame it on Egypt to start WWIII. But the ship would not sink, even though hit by a submarine missile that put a big hole in the ship. Almost 50 American soldiers were killed. The planes were flying so low they could see their faces in the planes. The survivors of the USS Liberty have their own website and anybody can go to it and read their accounts of what happened, and see that none of them think it was an "accident" or a "mistake" as Israel later claimed.

Originally posted by gottago
Yikes!

Have you ever met anyone who works in fashion? Let alone a fashion photographer? Trust me, this would tell you not too look too--ahem--deeply.

It's Vogue. Relax. Better to worry about the derivatives market, or the commercial real estate market, than that the First Lady is a Satanist sending coded messages to the faithful via fashion magazines.

hay im a fashion student welll i think i am wait where am i who am i oh pretty bird

Conspiracies that stretch as far as this never hold any water...

Michelle Obama showing a sign that signals an attack on March 10? C'mon man...give me a break.

I'm all for conspiracies but every week there seems to be a handful as ludicrous as this that just make me wonder where people get there info and what pills they are taking.

This isn't just a bit of a stretch, its a leap.

Originally posted by kerrichin

Originally posted by gottago
Yikes!

Have you ever met anyone who works in fashion? Let alone a fashion photographer? Trust me, this would tell you not too look too--ahem--deeply.

It's Vogue. Relax. Better to worry about the derivatives market, or the commercial real estate market, than that the First Lady is a Satanist sending coded messages to the faithful via fashion magazines.

hay im a fashion student welll i think i am wait where am i who am i oh pretty bird

Fashion photographers are artists and I admire their skill. But this fashion magazine is not an innocent diversion to make money. Vogue is a huge propaganda vehicle owned by people who are trillionaires, who are part of the matrix taking us all into the NWO. I'm sure the mag hires photographers who will go with the program, pick up on the "style" the owners are looking for. In this case, MO's cover pic is occult, occult, occult. This was done deliberately to send a certain powerful occult message to the general public (subliminally) and to the adepts to let them know what I believe is a March 10 false flag someplace.

Photographers are not privy to such grand plans. The editor of the mag may or may not be. But the pose itself and its message was planned ahead and carefully crafted.

reply to post by Salt of the Earth


What do you think of Webster Tarpley? Do you think his ideas are pretty accurate?

Originally posted by Bombeni
reply to post by Salt of the Earth

 

What do you think of Webster Tarpley? Do you think his ideas are pretty accurate?

I hear him on Alex Jones, and he's been right about everything. I've not read his books. I think he has some political views I don't agree with, but his analysis of Obama has been correct. If McCain had been elected we'd have Congressional gridlock instead of rubber stamping away the last of America's freedom and sovereignty.

BTW, I just replied to a post on a 5-year-old being eaten by an alligator, and the parents turned the creature loose and think it's okay -- I replied and suddenly the post got moved to Below Top Secret.

I was posting and found myself in a new environment all of a sudden. I don't get it. Do you know what happened?

Why is there an above top secret and a below top secret? Seems like a hierarchy of some kind, and the story and the thread were taking off, very relevant and interesting and then, boom -- gone.

reply to post by Salt of the Earth


That Tarpley guy seems to believe Obama is a puppet for the financial controllers. It is pretty evident, considering during Obama's campaign he mesmerized all these people into believing he was only there to help the average American. Now, out of over 800 billion dollars something like 90 percent of it is going straight to corporate America. Everything kinda feels like we are in fast forward now if that makes sense. It's time to wake up and smell the coffee. Suddenly all these puzzle pieces are starting to fit together, that our govt. was fully aware and stepped aside to let 911 happen, and now we are being conditioned to give in to a collapse where we will be putty in their hands. I'm coming to terms with many things in a short period of time.

Someone else could better answer your question about BTS I don't know much about it.