It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Really now? Let's see what the dictionary has to say:
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
You know, after reading the definitions, I can see where you would be confused.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
it is near impossible for us to say whether it is credible or not.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
You did make reference to it, implicating that it was part of an official disclosure project. Further, quoting you:
Originally posted by Majorion
The Cometa Report seems to conclude that some ufos represent extraterrestrial craft. And that was in 99
Are we any closer to some sort of disclosure? .. Not really.
Originally posted by Majorion
Either way, I never said that this report represents, as you say 'mythical disclosure'..
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Here you imply that yes, it is official.
One look at the names; says it all. Call it 'unofficial' if you please
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
If anything, you were twisting your own words to worm out of position demonstrated to be wrong.
I have to agree. If this is "disclosure" all Obama has to do is have some government agency post a bunch of 40 year old reports that are already in the public sphere on a website along with the contents of one of the fifty year old studies that concluded that some UFOs originate from other planets and voila, disclosure!! Maybe Podesta and company should just add a link on a government website to one of the online UFO databases and presto!
Originally posted by bluestreak53
From ,my point of view, we are probably getting further away from making any sense of UFO phenomena...
Originally posted by Majorion
Nice try, but I wasn't referring to the definition of the words. In fact, if you go back and take another look at my post, you will notice that I highlighted the words in your sentences; in which you will be able to see.. my point.
Originally posted by Majorion
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
There was no hesitancy on the part of the French government; they were explicit this report was neither commissioned by the government nor stated official government policy.
Explicit = Hesitancy
Originally posted by Majorion
No it's not, the cometa report is credible.
Originally posted by Majorion
I never implicated that this was part of some 'disclosure project'.. since you like to quote me, allow me to show you what I said in my very post in this thread;
Originally posted by Majorion
The Cometa Report seems to conclude that some ufos represent extraterrestrial craft. And that was in 99
Are we any closer to some sort of disclosure? .. Not really.
Originally posted by Majorion
And in another post, I said this;
Originally posted by Majorion
Either way, I never said that this report represents, as you say 'mythical disclosure'..
Originally posted by Majorion
And you can call it 'unofficial' if you please.
Originally posted by 0bserver1
Good job canada , were are the debunkers now debunk this for change ?
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
an implication that the Cometa Report was associated with disclosure, a step towards disclosure, albeit a stagnated stepped.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
How tying a report to disclosure is not an implication that the report does not represent disclosure, I don't know.
Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of the existence of extraterrestrials and the related conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups. Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's tradition of supporting the examination of the "extraterrestrial phenomenon" on the related conspiracy theories, cover-ups, and scandals.
Originally posted by Majorion
Are we any closer to some sort of disclosure? .. Not really.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
"I have conclusive proof these documents do not exist! It's a hoax!"
[edit on 17-2-2009 by SaviorComplex]
Originally posted by Majorion
And this is why you've been relentlessly attacking me in this thread? and attempting to personally discredit me and the cometa report?
Originally posted by Majorion
All because, of an allbeit-stagnated stepped insinuation; which you created/misinterpreted on your own?
Originally posted by Majorion
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
How tying a report to disclosure is not an implication that the report does not represent disclosure, I don't know.
Well perhaps I can help you understand. Because you seem to be struggling with this, why don't you read ATS' official statement at the top of this page:
Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of the existence of extraterrestrials and the related conspiracies...
Originally posted by Majorion
Are we any closer to some sort of disclosure? .. Not really.
Originally posted by bluestreak53
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Except this wasn't disclosure of anything. We're known for years that various governments at various times have investigated UFOs or at least kept some record of sightings. This is not disclosure of any secrets or a change in official policy regarding the phenomenon. It's nothing but a file-dump of material the Canadian government does not deem necessary to national security.
I have to agree. If this is "disclosure" all Obama has to do is have some government agency post a bunch of 40 year old reports that are already in the public sphere on a website along with the contents of one of the fifty year old studies that concluded that some UFOs originate from other planets and voila, disclosure!! Maybe Podesto and company should just add a link on a government website to one of the online UFO databases and presto! The mob will hail this as the dawn of a new and long awaited era of contact with extraterrestrial civilization....
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
There have been no new conclusions drawn.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
There were U.S. Government scientists saying the same thing back in the 1950s.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Exactly...This is what I was getting at in my post. If this is "disclosure", then the Americans disclosed long ago.
Originally posted by Majorion
And since the 50's till now, nothing has really been disclosed. At least, not on an 'official' basis.
Originally posted by rickyrrr
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
The way I read the article, the Canadian Government is not "now" concluding the UFOs are ET in nature, but rather they are releasing documents from the 1950s and 1960s in which some government officials felt that UFOs are ET in origin.
Those are two totally different things.
If you asked the Canadian Government today if they think UFOs are ET in origin, they would proabably honestly say "We don't know". Releasing these old documents really doesn't change anything.
I'm sure you can find that there were U.S. government officials in the 1950s and 1960s who felt that UFOs could possibly be flown by ETs. That was not an unusual opinion to have back then -- not even for an educated opinion.
[edit on 2/16/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]
If it doesn't change anything, why do you think they bother? It costs taxpayer's money to declassify documents. Seven different countries have done the same in the last year or two. Do you have a guess as to why they're doing it if it doesn't change anything?
-rrr
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Actually, Project Blue Book ran until the end of 1969. Those files are available.