posted on Feb, 25 2009 @ 11:11 AM
cont.
W67: If we go by the assumption that this human life is indeed a game. Wouldn't going through these exercies, which may lead to re-remembering, be
cheating?
J: There is a hidden truth to this. This cheating, as you call it, has a way of increasing the nastiness involved. If you keep your thinking at a
certain level, it keeps Game play within certain healthy parameters.
TANS: Here's a snip from what Hidden_hand said:
Q: What does the term " generational member" mean? Which generation specificaly??
A: It means that one is born into the Family. The Order and it's agenda is handed down, from generation to generation. Only in extremely rare
occasions, have outsiders been invested into the Family, and then, even these were of other 'esoterically' integrable lines.
So is your family that rare occasion where outisders that have been invested in the family?
Honestly, so far your own answers have been very vague, general and unoriginal. I don't know whether you ware trying to discredit hidden hand/insider
or if you are just doing it for the attention. I think it's time either come clean or bow out while you are so far behind.
J: This is an interesting line of thought.
Firstly, I am vague, general and unoriginal. You will have to bear that particular cross. You will find that my answers have a lot to do with the
question being asked. A vague, general and unorignal question will invariably get a vague, general and unorignal answer.
I hope that it doesn't discredit them. My understanding is that them teaching it they desired for it to be taught from many mouths. Echoing Jones, I
am not the best teacher, however few are doing it, so I guess it has to be me to do it. If anything my example, shows how a person of low potential
who it honestly trying can have more effect than several of high potential who couldn't care less.
So I teach. I've asked others if they can teach, but no one wants to do it. So it has to be me. I'm the only one I can control, so if I want it
done, it has to be me.
However, with the right questions, I think you could get more out of the conversation, and out of me.
OK, I'll come out with a better answer for this. The Families have existance both multi-dimentionally and physically. HH decided to talk about the
physical aspect. To ensure the continuation of their wealth and power, the physical bloodlines have found that rational thinking and the extablishment
of family rules has helped them retain what they have.
However, via multi-dimentional connectivity, the spiritual ties extend far outside of the physical bloodline's limits. Much of God exists within the
Autistic Legions (the mentally hanicapped), and in other places you would never think it would extend to. Because of this, its very possible for a
person to be spiritually of a House, but not even be related by blood (or perhaps a better way of saying it, is the blood ties have not been recorded
in many bloodlines).
What HH is saying is that the cream that rises to the top always seems to be of Starseed origin. In that, you can take the leaders in any given area
and upon analysis of their spiritual origins and generational ties, they almost always have "old blood" in them. In a few of the cases, they are
from other Houses (what was meant by "other esoterically integratable lines). Very rarely does a pure human rise above a certain level of power,
wealth or control.
I have read that Stalin was one of the rare cases. However, there are strong spiritual forces that try to integrate the person into the House they are
associating with, sometimes violently. By the time the process is finished they are for all intents and purposes, integrated into that Line.
Its just something that has been measured and found to be an empiracal truth.
UAW: What is the benifet of a bloodline exposing the history to the masses?
J: Part of it is in accomplishing Armageddon, in that the bloodlines require negative emotions to their person in order to grow spiritually.
A quick and easy way of doing that is going to a place where leadership is not respected, stir the pot a bit.
Also, it has a positive effect in that there is a curious relationship between authority and those who resist authority. As with the bloodlines
themselves, they have found that only Starseeds participate in this behavior. Pure humans are at their jobs, enjoying their families, etc. etc. and it
passifies and inspires the nay-sayers.
By the time Hidden Hand left, even and especially amoung the nay-sayers developed a facination with HH's words, many even studying what he was
saying.
The Game is curious that way when you understand it better.
Another example, Jay and I. I was starting to notice that I wasn't being rebelled against, and that there was an imbalance occuring. With skilled
warriors/players, we would have dynamically managed this. However, because of lack of education on these matters, Jay's performance was amaturish.
However it did lead to balance. Did I make him do this? No, he was responding to Infinite Intelligence. Something outside of himself saw what was
occuring and what needed to happen.
Usually in these situations, the rational person will realize that they need to learn The Game better. One of the ways I like to play The Game is
through rational, intellectual discussion. It doesn't POP! like how this did. It raises the levels a bit, you stay at those levels for a while, every
one bows to each other, forgives and leaves for a while, and then the process repeats, until the Armageddon impulse subsides.
If you analyse the conversation between Little Star and myself, you will see the correct mode of Accusation (the traditional name for this struggling
with one another). She chose her "turf" (ie. House affiliation) by flying the colors of Jesus, and I chose mine by flying the colors of Seth.
Through rational behavior and conversation, you will see that LS and myself have gotten into some disagreements. We did not filthy ourselves with hate
speech and grandeous displays of agressions; instead we reasoned with each other. We accused each other, agreed where we found agreement, and
disagreed where we thought the other in error. This is the proper way to work out aggressions. Hell, we are so good at it that we were even working on
something beautiful and productive WHILE we were disagreeing with each other!