"Supposide" video of alien on the moon

Hi Guys,

Sorry i have missed this being discussed before, i came across this "supposide" video of an alien found on the moon and transported back on apollo 20 (apollo 19 found it, apollo 20 went to investigate further)

www.youtube.com...

This more than likely has 1000 threads on it but i couldn't find any

what do you guys think?

cheers

Graham

reply to post by Graham



not completely convinced but i think at least the Alien in this video is a fake.

not very convincing at all

this has been discussed many times you should use the search


www.abovetopsecret.com...

i knew it had to be somewhere lol

thanks mate

Graham

reply to post by Graham


no problem fellow truth seeker

even though i think these videos are not the real thing, i often wonder if someone is just trying to tell us something with them.

what if something like this really did happen but we will never see the real evidence ?

anythings possible since NASA won't let us see the good stuff

happy reading !

1: astronauts do not operate on anything, even alien orifices.

2: NASA shuttles do not have theromins onboard.

This video gets my vote for lamest hoax ever.

i know what you mean mate, there is SO many videos out there now we could be by-passing the real ones lol

cheers

Graham

Not shocking.. not alien... not evidence... on the bright side it does fail nicely.

As much as I lean to the belief that we are not alone, this particular video is completely fabricated.

In the early 70's, there was no digital recording medium, only film and analog video tape, the smallest for the early 70's would be the 3/4 format. The equipment for that format was not portable enough to even fit into the command module much less a LEM.

The grammar of the captions and even the CG captions in the video are so elementary level its not funny. "NASA ARE decoding it"..."This is no fake no hoax no lies"....that alone is phooey.

Oh well....just another look at my fabricating abilities video on youbloobe.



Cheers!!!!

And what is "supposide" supposed to mean?

reply to post by easynow


Hello mate

Yeah I have to agree with you. But then you know what NASA stands for.....
Never a straight answer.

MH

You know somebody did some work on this but the Alien is a fake IMO

If you look outside the lander window I spotted what looked like the old Soviet lander take a look at this picture then go back to the video and it's at 4:11 strange huh?







[edit on 8-2-2009 by SLAYER69]

The video is obviously a fake but I would love to see the original NASA video if there is any of this supposed landing

I think the alien part is a fake but I wonder where did he get the black and white landing footage from and why add the old Soviet lander when nobody will notice it



[edit on 8-2-2009 by SLAYER69]

I'm going to U2U people I think this needs a fresh look!
check back everybody

The supposed alien is clearly a wax figure. As for the ship on the lunar surface I can't see no reason not to keep an open mind on it. Besides I have seen both the supposed alien and the ship in different videos and pictures before. Someone made this as an hoax.

Isnt it quite funny how the footage is produced to be extremely low FPS?!!

That would be needed to hide a fabrication. Make it all jerky and choppy. Any official footage, leaked or not, would not be incredibly choppy or shot with 3 frames per second frame rate. They would film that material at the most high resolution available to get as much detail as possible and not be all fuzzy and zooming in and out every 5 seconds and jerking the camera around.

The rover...its got pieces missing. Just compare the two images. Its been photoshopped into the frame and even the angles are incorrect in relation to the fake ground and shadow.

The only real thing about it all is the author jerking the people who actually buy into it.




Cheers!!!!

Why does the video have special effects like slow motion?


and the alien......Are they chicks from Thailand all of a sudden?



This video = a COMPLETE waste of time.


.:i:.

Analysis of the "Soviet Rover"

First image...the Soviet Moon Rover.



Second image...the LEM of fantasy Apollo 20 photo of the Soviet Rover.



Third image...the LEM of fantasy Apollo 20 photo of the Soviet Rover gamma adjusted to bring out things a bit more.



Fourth image...the LEM of fantasy Apollo 20 photo of the Soviet Rover..inverted.



Now isnt it funny how the Soviet Rover's shadow does not line up correctly as the LEM shadow does????

Also look at the faked Soviet Rover in the fantasy Apollo 20 LEM lander photo. There are pieces missing on that rover, as well as the "bucket" containing the rover guts is not centered on the wheels correctly.

PHOTOSHOP FAKE.



Enjoy!!


Cheers!!!!

Originally posted by RFBurns


The only real thing about it all is the author jerking the people who actually buy into it.

I'm not buying into it I just thought is was odd is all because most people have not noticed it. I thought it was worth posting and investigating thanks for everybody's opinion

Again it does seem very odd that somebody would put that in when hardly anybody would notice.


[edit on 8-2-2009 by SLAYER69]

Originally posted by OMNI.23
Why does the video have special effects like slow motion?


and the alien......Are they chicks from Thailand all of a sudden?



This video = a COMPLETE waste of time.


.:i:.

The "slow motion" is to hide detail of the fakery. Its a classic technique that doesnt work these days to anyone who knows a fraction about making a video.

And as I have said..NASA would not film such an important find at 3 frames per second, and jerk the camera around so much, and zoom in and out consistantly and only get 3 or 4 seconds of things. They would film at a full 30 frames per second, hold that camera so steady it would be like a camera on a tripod, not zoom in and out every 5 seconds and the footage would be incredibly sharp.



Cheers!!!!

reply to post by SLAYER69


I noticed it the first time I seen this video. I never mentioned it because of the fact the entire video is just one huge fabrication.

But I highlighted the still you posted and inverted it so it can be seen that its just a photoshopped insert, the shadow isnt even right.



Cheers!!!!