It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evasius
The trouble is, our viewpoint is embedded deep within the universe. We're so far away from the edges, there's a limit to how far we can see.
Originally posted by Razimus
Originally posted by Evasius
The trouble is, our viewpoint is embedded deep within the universe. We're so far away from the edges, there's a limit to how far we can see.
There are no edges of the universe.
Originally posted by Wethesheeple
reply to post by Evasius
You sir have officially blown my mind. That was probably the coolest thing I have ever read. Do you have some links of stuff I could research?
Originally posted by obsidience
At the risk of sounding like an idiot I'm going to disagree with everyone here and say that the universe does not spin.
A spinning motion requires something exterior to the universe as a frame of reference and the universe is the universe, there's nothing outside of it that can be used as a stationary point of reference to make such a claim.
Originally posted by Evasius
I agree with you on this. Perhaps the universe is expanding to fill an external void (like a balloon in a bottle). If this is the case, spinning motion wouldn't be required, only a flexible encasement. Also, spinning seems to be required for the coherence of solid space bodies within our universe - it's one of our physical laws here. Who's to say the laws are the same beyond our universe? There could possibly be no rules in hyperspace...gravity, magnetism, the entire electromagnetic spectrum we experience may be absent 'on the other side.' Who knows, 'spinning' as we know it may not even be possible in other realms or the higher dimensions.