It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Saudi authorities have beheaded a Saudi man convicted of fatally shooting a fellow citizen over a dispute.
Jamal al-Shammari was executed in the northern city of Hayel after being convicted of murdering Mitaab al-Ghaithi, the Interior Ministry says in a statement without explaining the nature of the dispute.
Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam under which people convicted of murder, drug trafficking, rape and armed robbery can be executed, usually with a sword.
Sunday's beheading brings to 8 the number of beheadings in the kingdom this year, according to an Associated Press count. In 2008, 102 people were beheaded.
Originally posted by pikypiky
What is a sword to Saudi Arabia could be a guillotine to America. Both are swift and hopefully painless. Plus, it would solve the over-crowding in jails and save the governing bodies lots of money just to try, convict and sentence the useless, bottom feeders.
HOWEVER, it would mean countless innocents put to death (after the fact).
Originally posted by RFBurns
Not as swift as the guillotine by any means. Usually the executioner has to at least swing twice to completely sever the head. That first blow wont be painless.
Originally posted by imd12c4funn
A few swift limb removals or death sentences would make many think twice when determining the risk factor for most crime.
A good start would be the financial criminals.
Originally posted by pikypiky
Perhaps, they could stop using swords, then, or at least put the poor chaps in a deep sleep or provide some sort of pain free death.
The more laws there are, the more crime there is
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by pikypiky
Perhaps, they could stop using swords, then, or at least put the poor chaps in a deep sleep or provide some sort of pain free death.
Their method of execution is primative and quite barbaric. I agree, put them to death by lethal injection, which is painless and quick.
If I am not mistaken, we have a member here at ATS who is from Saudi. Maybe that member could provide some insight into this.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by dooper
I read years ago that while the executions by the guillotine were occurring in France, that medical doctors took that opportunity to study the effects on consciousness.
Think about it. Unless the body has received a serious shock to the nervous system, the head has blood and oxygen in it. It has full faculties for moments past its separation from the body.
These doctors would grab up a head after it had been lopped off, and timing the duration, would document for how long a head would respond to the doctors yelling their name.
One of the guys, a bluebeard, or blackbeard, continued to respond almost eight minutes later.
So when that person has their head lopped off, they know exactly when it happened, and have their vision, hearing, and awareness for an average of a minute and a half or so.
Smashing their head with a large mallet would be more humane. You want it fast and complete, put their head under a pile driver.
Done deal.