It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There's no evidence. Not one single shred of physical, forensic or scientific evidence that no planes hit the towers. So it's the banning of disinformation, that's more correct.
Originally posted by intriguedUK
Has there been a theory yet that actually no buildings were involved and the whole thing was staged through holographic imagery and mind control by the FBI making people actually think they saw all this happen by implanting visions and secretly transfering videos etc onto peoples video cameras etc through electro magnetic waves which they could do with their thoughts?
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
Great research... single minded and ignores data when told to....
You must be working on a "grant". You find what they tell you....
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by thedman
Notice debris emerging out of building
That debris would be papers and pieces of building.
Originally posted by thedman
Debris covering roof on nearby building - doesn't look like jet engine?
Actually, that round part is from a jet engine. The rest of the debris is paper and parts of the building.
Originally posted by thedman
Burned seat cushions
You mean cushion with no "s"? You have no way of knowing if it's from a plane or from the thousands of seats, chairs and couches inside the WTC.
Here's the picture you should have shown, had you not tried to be deceitful. The impact was contained inside the building:
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
September Clueless and the "no-planes at the WTC" theory is considered disinfo by the majority of the 9/11 truth movement and is banned from discussion at all professional 9/11 organizations except Pilots.
[edit on 30-1-2009 by _BoneZ_]
And this is what no-planers do when everything gets debunked and they have nothing to say. They just attack. Nice of you to act your age instead of being a good adult and trying to refute my debunks of your disinfo the past several posts of mine.
Originally posted by zerozero00
the planes wings have already entered the building....Yet!!...the building is still intact!!...WOW!!...Freaking amazing!!...and you believe this BS??
Originally posted by zerozero00
I see ......Except "Pilots"!
Originally posted by zerozero00
I have nothing to do with any truth movement
Originally posted by AllTiedTogether
Can either of you please provide a link to a video or documents that might back up your statement. I understand you worked hard on proving the no plane theory was a hoax... so after five years where is the documents to show what you proved? I'd like to see a video maybe of someone breaking down the no plane theory bit by bit please.
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by LwSiX
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
You mean like this:
I dont think that single engine cessna can do 400+ mph and have the mass and momentum of a twin jet engine passenger airliner.
If it could however, what would be left of that cessna? And would the tail be sticking out of the building? No.
But the cessna pic does show the example of the bouncing effect, for a cessna flying along at 130 or less mph.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by finemanm
My friend saw a plane with his EYES go into the trade center.