It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adam_zapple
...WTC 1 & 2 were CD......
How much dynamite would it take to cause the towers to collapse how they did?
Originally posted by C-JEAN
Hi Adam.
Originally posted by adam_zapple
...WTC 1 & 2 were CD......
CD ???
Originally posted by C-JEAN
How much dynamite would it take to cause the towers to collapse how they did?
A few thousand pounds.
Originally posted by Stryker211
Hope this will help answer your question. www.youtube.com...
posted by cogburn
The fact that the OP asked for "dynamite" and then half of this thread turned into "why use dynamite" is pure comedy.
Given that dynamite is a simple compound with a predictable energy yield, it is commonly used as a measure of comparison to other explosives.
Take the term "megaton" as in the phrase "a 15 megaton bomb". The "megaton" is the equivalent weight in dynamite required to produce the same yield as the explosive in question.
1 megaton = 1 tetragram of dynamite = 4,184,000,000,000,000 J of energy
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves.
Originally posted by Stryker211
I thought he was saying it was dynamite that was used in the CD. Sorry I was just pointing out that the use of thermite would be way more effective then just dynamite.
Originally posted by Shroomery
Seeing that a few fires could destroy the entire building, not much apparently...
Originally posted by Shroomery
I find it strange that people believe that fires could bring them down without any effort, yet when someone suggests explosives are envolved, suddenly we need thousands of pounds and explosives on every floor. Gotta love that 21st century logic.
Originally posted by adam_zapple
Not really...I'm not aware of any explosive material which will melt steel.