It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by resistancia
reply to post by BugByte
You know as well I do that refraining is easier for some and contraception is often neglected for whatever reasons. Contraception is also not infallible and can fail.
Me personally? Well I have never had to make a decision to have an abortion but I worked with very young girls who chose to abort for various reasons.
Most of these young frightened girls are so stressed about the moral implications and are racked with guilt after the procedure that it is heartbreaking, some appear to deal with the decision a little better.
It is/was their choice and I respect the right to choose.
res
Just my thoughts on the topic feel free to tell me if I'm wrong
Would it not be easier to just keep it in you pant's?
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by frankdatank
Just my thoughts on the topic feel free to tell me if I'm wrong
I'm not saying you're wrong, I clearly disagree with your reasoning. It's too narrow and simplistic, does not factor in what needs to be, hence why I stated what I stated. (just my opinion)
You use the words narrow and simplistic, please tell me how?
but we could also lower are spending by exterminating handicapped mentally and physically as most are on government assistance we should go ahead and take of elderly to or at least the ones recieving government assistance
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by frankdatank
You use the words narrow and simplistic, please tell me how?
This statement says it all:
but we could also lower are spending by exterminating handicapped mentally and physically as most are on government assistance we should go ahead and take of elderly to or at least the ones recieving government assistance
Comparing non-comparables. Because of your own way of thinking you see something as relatable that just isn’t when assessing the situation as a whole and not a snippet. I’m not trying to put you down whatsoever, just explaining (as you wished) why I state what I stated. I noticed this is your first day here so I’m going to assume you may not have read the rules and don’t know about off topic post. I’m done assessing your statements because I don’t think it’s contributing to the conversation, it’s just becoming off-topic back and forth. However if you’d like to continue discussing abortion I’ll have no trouble replying.
Agian you should be a politician your done but willing to dicuss it?
Originally posted by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by StevenDye
Once again: the fetus does not have a CHOICE, it is not a sentient being and can not have one. It is an undeveloped growth inside the mother. SHE is the only sentient being in the equation and the only one with a choice. A woman should be the only person allowed to dictate what goes on in her uterus.
Originally posted by Riviera
One Vatican official warned against the "arrogance" of those in power who think they can decide between life and death.
I find that rather ironic coming from the Vatican lol.