It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The case of an 89-year-old man, who was shot with a Taser gun by officers, has been referred to a police watchdog.
Police said they used the device as the pensioner was threatening to cut his throat with a piece of glass in a street in Llandudno, Conwy.
His family have now made an official complaint, which was referred by North Wales Police to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).
The force said afterwards officers made a judgement to protect his life.
North Wales Police said all complaints over Tasers are dealt with by the IPCC.
It was then up to the watchdog to decide whether to hold an investigation.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by CX
"Whilst i think it is unthinkable to use a Taser on someone of that age, has anyone looked at the other side of the coin? "
Here to play the role of Police State Apologist, aren't you?
Please take your propaganda and dialectic-based arguments elsewhere - or at least try to be less obvious.
Mental health services have come under fire in an independent report that raises concerns on a range of issues - not least the use of CS gas to restrain patients on the wards.
The review also expressed concerns about the level of drug abuse on the wards and high level of use of the act to detain people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
It criticised low levels of interaction between carers and patients and low levels of staffing.
The review - the eighth biennial report of the Mental Health Act Commission - is published on the eve of the government's review of mental health services.
Significant failings
Gordon Lakes, acting chairman of the commission, said: "It is a fundamental principle that those subject to compulsion by reason of a mental disorder should be assured of an appropriate standard of care and treatment."
New warnings for anti-psychotic drugs and elderly patients
You have to wonder, what took so long?
On Monday, the Food and Drug Administration announced that it would require strong warnings on anti-psychotic drugs advising that they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia.
At issue are so-called “conventional” anti-psychotic medications such as Haldol, Compazine, Mellaril and Thorazine. (For a complete list, see the FDA’s press release.) A similar warning was issued for “atypical” anti-psychotics, including Risperdal and Zyprexa, in 2005.
Neither class of medication is approved for elderly dementia patients, but they’re frequently prescribed any way for symptoms such as agitation, combativeness or out-of-control behavior. The FDA gives doctors discretion to prescribe for “off label” purposes.
LEAD: More than a decade after a Federal study found serious overuse and misuse of powerful drugs in nursing homes, many patients are still being drugged into a stupor just to make them easier to care for.
Anti-psychotic drugs commonly used to treat Alzheimer's disease may double a patient's chance of dying within a few years, suggests a new study that adds to concerns already known about such medications. For the vast majority of Alzheimer's patients, taking these drugs is probably not a worthwhile risk, said Clive Ballard, the paper's lead author, of the Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases at King's College London. Would I want to take a drug that slightly reduced my aggression but doubled my risk of dying?
And it was the mundane details secretly recounted by Debbie into her tape recorder that were most powerful: the ‘odd smell’, the lack of fresh air or fruit, the TV constantly switched on, the boredom and loneliness, the early nights - “the earliest I’ve been in bed for years”, the kind and jolly staff and the next door voice crying-out unheard. “Take no notice - she’s just old,” Debbie was advised.
She said: “I am doing this because I feel at least I can give people who are in the homes a voice. When you are in a home you can’t complain. You are afraid of what might happen to you.”
She said: “I am doing this because I feel at least I can give people who are in the homes a voice. When you are in a home you can’t complain. You are afraid of what might happen to you.”