It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PoisonousPoison
reply to post by Luciferdescending
I understand what you mean and where your coming from no offense taken . It is quite interesting how the term of pedophilia or any form of the word pedophile instantly means engaging with or attempting to engage with sex with one who is under the age of 18, when it should be something for one children who are at least under the age of 11 or perhaps down to 10?
Either way being that this was done in the U.K. I'm not sure how much different it all is compared to if this were to have happened in the U.S. Perhaps the word would be thrown in a lot more heavily.
Its funny that if this teacher was male, you guys would be saying, cut of his balls, etc...
Oh no its a female so lets be respectful, she is a paedo full stop. Males have to pay all there lifes for garbage like this.
Society has a pathetic double standard.
Originally posted by PoisonousPoison
reply to post by Luciferdescending
Probably fair to say that after "to catch a predator" (possibly before that?) the whole concept of pedophilia has changed, no longer just regarding those who are well below the age of 11 or anything like that. Now it's just anyone under the age of 16 (Well 15 also to since I believe some states stated that 15 was the threshold.)
Don't think that word will be the same again and as of now I'm sure we can all just wait until Webster's dictionary changes the word to match the "given" meaning. At least that's how I see it might go.