It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
JERUSALEM (AFP) — Israel should follow the example set by the United States when it brought Japan to its knees at the end of World War II, the head of an ultra-nationalist opposition party was quoted as saying Tuesday.
"We must continue to fight Hamas just like the United States did with the Japanese in World War II," Avigdor Lieberman said, according to the website of the Jerusalem Post newspaper.
Japan surrendered in 1945 after atomic bombs were dropped on the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Originally posted by TheKingsVillian
reply to post by forklift
Wouldnt any type or size nuke still effect the water table and the sea, which in turn would hurt Israel?
Originally posted by xbranscombex
I think people get mixed up between Atomic bombs and Nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by xbranscombex
I think people get mixed up between Atomic bombs and Nuclear weapons.
Please clarify your point. Why do you say people are mixed up between the Abomb and nuclear bombs? What difference is there in the effect other than deaths and contamination?
Originally posted by NatureBoy
THEY WANT THE LAND!
Originally posted by forklift
Originally posted by NatureBoy
THEY WANT THE LAND!
True, but it doesn't look like palestinians are gona migrate soon.
I guess if the israeli methods of Choke and Massacre doesn't work, than Nuke might just be an option.
Originally posted by Jinni
Originally posted by forklift
Originally posted by NatureBoy
THEY WANT THE LAND!
They are -already- nuking them with harmful radiation!
The current death toll will be tiny compared with the long-term nuclear radition effects and as result of their weapons.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by xbranscombex
I think people get mixed up between Atomic bombs and Nuclear weapons.
Please clarify your point. Why do you say people are mixed up between the Abomb and nuclear bombs? What difference is there in the effect other than deaths and contamination?
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by masonwatcher
Originally posted by xbranscombex
I think people get mixed up between Atomic bombs and Nuclear weapons.
I am just appauled that Israel is even speaking or tossing about the idea of using any kind of nuclear weapon and trying to justify their actions to the likes of what WWII was between the US and Japan! Are they genocidal? Do they really expect the world to just idle by and allow them to set off a nuke right next door to Egypt and Syria and Lebannon? Do they really want to be the instigators of WWIII?