It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The head of the UN agency in Gaza running the school that was attacked by Israel forces has rejected claims that Hamas fighters were inside the converted shelter.
*snip*
John Ging, the director of operations in Gaza for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (Unrwa), told reporters that he had visited the school during a three-hour lull in the fighting on Wednesday and "was reassured by the management of the school ... that there were no militants in the school".
Originally posted by expatwhite
reply to post by Bl0rg
the UN is denying it because they were "reassured" by the managers of the school. Im no zionist apologist, but did you REALLY expect them to admit it to the UN if they did have fighters there?
"of course Mr UN person, we had 15 Hamas fighters in the basement, how dare Isreal bomb us back-ps, please dont withdraw your UN support or funding for the school just because of this tiny mishap, we thought it was a book club meeting"
Im totally against whats happening but taking one sides word for something, then making that an offical UN standpoint is just stupid.
Please........
Originally posted by jam321
And I don't know why people are so quick to defend Hamas (knowing that they use civilian areas to attack Israel) and say that Hamas wasn't in the building shooting at Israel. It works both ways.
You are talking about the same people who deliberately use civilian places to attack Israel.
The same people who shoot their own people, kill their own people, and torture their own citizens....
It could be that the people who deny such things are brainwashed by the media.
It is really sickening and yet somehow becoming part of the accepted norm.
Shame Shame Shame
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by mr-lizard
The same could be said about Hamas firing rockets into Israel. Surely they could go after the army rather than the civilians. Like I said, it works both ways. You condemn the same thing the other side is doing.
Originally posted by Neaux
It is absolutely absurd to assume there will be no civilian casualties or to even expect it.
Originally posted by Neaux
[Where does it say Israel is intentionally targeting innocent civilians? The militants are civilians and not part of a regular army so in that sense you are correct, but there is no proof they are intentionally targeting innocent civilians.