Rice: Liar or Confused

This:

part of a child sex-slave/mind control project

Your opinion is whatever you want it to be dude, but it is open to criticism, correct?
As to your dribble over people "blowing up over possibilities...your distracting and trying to provide yourself reason to believe that I am "blowing up" over said possibilies. To the contrary...no, I'm not....I am openly asking you to clarify your reasoning for such a label....

Tell you what Cappa.....how about provide ONE shred of evidence that even remotely constitutes a label placed on Dr. Rice as being:

part of a child sex-slave/mind control project

You may be comfortable with tossing such labels around but please be aware, if your not already, that you allow others to openly address and question/criticize your said labeling, opinion, beliefs, etc....hence, thats the 'beef' I have with your possibility(ies).


seekerof

Why does it piss you off so much, anyway?? You don't like it, ignore it. == Cappa

Seekerof, thats the only meaningful statement that I have seen in here, Cappa's advice to
you I mean. The only reason I came in here was to see why you were here. Take a deep
breath, wipe the mud off, and go back to the rails and just watch the bananas dance in the mud.
Reason and logic does not exist in the mud pit. Do what I do at a rodeo. Watch the swine
getting judged for who is the biggest and most slimey. Take heart from the fact that they all end
up as hams

/\/ight\/\/ing

(EEEeeeek I just posted with the Seagulls. What to do for pennance??)

Originally posted by Thorfinn Skullsplitter
One major thing that bothers me around here is that anything anyone can't explain immediately becomes a "project" or some super global conspiracy down to the most minute detail, perpetrated by a reptilian super race and a satanic cult.

Sometimes a liar is just a liar...

That is true, and all well and good. But the way I see it, if the possibilities are not explored, if they are kept to one's self, how can any new ground be covered? What if, 2 years, 10 years or 50 years from now something is revealed, and it could have been discovered earlier if someone had only spoken up and proposed the idea?

If I have evidence, I say I have it. If it's an idea, I state so clearly. But to have someone attempt to insult my intelligence, and take offense to something not at all geared toward them is another issue all together.

Originally posted by Cappa

That is true, and all well and good. But the way I see it, if the possibilities are not explored, if they are kept to one's self, how can any new ground be covered? What if, 2 years, 10 years or 50 years from now something is revealed, and it could have been discovered earlier if someone had only spoken up and proposed the idea?

If I have evidence, I say I have it. If it's an idea, I state so clearly. But to have someone attempt to insult my intelligence, and take offense to something not at all geared toward them is another issue all together.

But anyone could say anything about anything. Possibilities don't mean anything. It's possible that the sun will blow up tommorrow. Is there any reason to think it might? No, but hey, it's a possibility.

But a possibility that has some substance to it is a whole different matter. I mean come on. What's a human's first instinct when they are going to get in trouble? To lie. So why would Rice's possibility of lying make her stand out as a product of a child sex-slave project? If there was a tid-bit of evidence, however minute, then that would atleast be a place to start. But because there is none, it kind of makes the possibility of rather frivolous...

Is it just me or does Condie sound like a sixth grader giving an oral report for the first time? Her voice has that trembling in it.

Face it folks, we will never ever truly know what went down before, during, and after 9-11.

Ok, here it is in black and white:

Rice: The FBI also tasked all
56 of its U.S. Field Offices to increase surveillance of
known or suspected terrorists and reach out to known
informants who might have information on terrorist
activities.

The FBI had not tasked any of their offices to do any such thing. The director of the FBI has received no such information or orders to do so. That was an out right lie. Out of the thousands of interviews with FBI agents by the 9/11 commission non of them had any information what so ever about what she is saying.

How much clearer does it have to get? She perjured herself.