It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikesingh
Yes! Soldiers of Allah who have been ordained to fight by him to kill all non believers. For this the means don't matter. The end does.
>>snip
Originally posted by mister.old.school
These Abrahamic religions all have severe amounts of blood tainting their collective "regressed" souls. None are without guilt. All have sanctioned atrocities in the name of "God".
Originally posted by mikesingh
As far as I’m concerned, religion is an outdated concept.
Originally posted by mister.old.school
Having said what you've just said above, I find myself confused as to how you can defend one "side" over another in this current flare-up of a centuries-old conflict.
Originally posted by mikesingh
You must be aware that these extremist groups are using Pelatinians as human shields resulting in casualties to innocent men women and children. Why don't they come out and fight?
Originally posted by mister.old.school
Originally posted by mikesingh
You must be aware that these extremist groups are using Pelatinians as human shields resulting in casualties to innocent men women and children. Why don't they come out and fight?
Perhaps it would be beneficial to examine the influences and circumstances imposed upon these "extremist groups" that has prompted them to consider operating in such an extreme manner?
Extremism in all religions is but a symptom born of external influences.
The truth is that out of 640 people killed (Excluding Israelis) only 176 are civilians.
Yes! Soldiers of Allah who have been ordained to fight by him to kill all non believers. For this the means don't matter. The end does.
Originally posted by DantesLost
It is forbidden in Islam to kill another with just cause.
The,'kill all non believers' is only acceptable if you are attacked.It is forbidden for a Muslim to instigate an attack just so that they can kill non-Muslims.It is all in the Qur'an,maybe you should take the time to read it.
Originally posted by mikesingh
And Israel needs to hit these terrorists hard. Period!
...but what's Israel's alternative? To let the Hamas keep firing their rockets into Israel with impunity till the cows come home?
Ok, time to get Pro Israel: Lot's of good movies here so get some popcorn:
Originally posted by John Matrix
Ok, time to get Pro Israel: Lot's of good movies here so get some popcorn:
The days of the Terrorists are numbered.
Near Medina was a castle of Jews, against whom Muhammad was already incensed because of their disrespect or his theology. They had shown a disposition to side with the probable victor in this last struggle, and Muhammad now fell upon- them, slew all the men, nine hundred of them, and enslaved the women and children. Possibly many of their late allies were among the bidders for these slaves. Never again after this quaint failure did Mecca make an effective rally against Muhammad, and one by one its leading men came over to his side.
Thereafter his power extended, there were battles, treacheries, massacres; but on the whole he prevailed, until he was master of all Arabia; and when he was master of all Arabia in 632, at the age of sixty-two, he died.
Throughout the concluding eleven years of his life after the Hegira, there is little to distinguish the general conduct of Muhammad from that of any other welder of peoples into a monarchy. The chief difference is his use of a religion of his own creation as his cement. He was diplomatic, treacherous, ruthless, or compromising as the occasion required and as any other Arab king might have been in his place; and there was singularly little spirituality in his kingship. Nor was his domestic life power and freedom one of exceptional edification. Until the death of Kadija, when he was fifty, he seems to have been the honest husband of one wife; but then, as many men do in their declining years, he developed a disagreeably strong interest in women.
These are salient facts in these last eleven years of Muhammad's career. Because he, too, founded a great religion, there are those who write of this evidently lustful and rather shifty leader as though he were a man to put beside Jesus of Nazareth or Gautama or Mani. But it is surely manifest that he was a being of a commoner clay; he was vain egotistical, tyrannous, and a self-deceiver; and it would throw all our history out of proportion if, out of an insincere deference to the possible Moslem reader, we were to present him in any other light.