It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

April Gallop Sues American Airlines, but claims there was no plane?

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by CameronFox
 


Eh, just thought I would put it out there, not having read anything about this subject of this April woman of course, the topic just caught my eye.


Well, plenty to read in my op.


What I find hard to believe is the war going on between CIT and you fella's. My own personal beliefs aside (A blind, mentally challenged monkey could tell that no plane hit the pentagon) .........


Well this Blind Mentally Challenged monkey requests that you present your facts and opinions regarding the Flyover / Flyaround fantasy at one of the many threads that are already discussing it.

Thank you.



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by CameronFox

Well this Blind Mentally Challenged monkey requests that you present your facts and opinions regarding the Flyover / Flyaround fantasy at one of the many threads that are already discussing it.

Thank you.


Will do, after work I will have a gander and see what I can come up with.

I would like to go on record as saying that I believe my chiming in at this juncture in the overall argument to be pointless for 2 reasons:

1. You display the attitude of someone who is set in their beliefs and very hard to persuade otherwise, and would defend your beliefs to the bitter end - possibly overlooking key evidence in your concretedness.

2. Most of the arguments I would bring to the table have been thrown around a thousand times already, argued over this way and that and yet still no resolution has been found.

Having said that I shall give it some thought and get back to you.



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 05:25 PM
link   
I am not set in my ways. I look at the facts.


Present some facts dude... I'm all ears.



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 07:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Kryties
 


I appreciate your willingness to post. However, I see you preparing the battlefield (so-to-speak). In other words, I believe you know you don't have any evidence of your beliefs.

That doesn't mean you're "wrong". Your beliefs are your own and whatever they are you entitled to them. People like us demand actual proof before we jump off. That's all.



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 07:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by CameronFox


What I find hard to believe is the war going on between CIT and you fella's. My own personal beliefs aside (A blind, mentally challenged monkey could tell that no plane hit the pentagon) .........


Well this Blind Mentally Challenged monkey requests that you present your facts and opinions regarding the Flyover / Flyaround fantasy at one of the many threads that are already discussing it.

Thank you.


Actually, this has been covered before.

It takes the IQ of a monkey -32 - to believe that no plane hit the Pentagon.

With this post, I guess this makes it - and I think we should keep it in the spirit of the Ranquisamo gaggle - scientifically proven and double corroborated.......


[edit on 6-1-2009 by Seymour Butz]



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Kryties
 


Let's see...us monkeys have:

Dozens of witnesses to Flight 77 slamming into the Pentagon
Dozens of pictures of airliner wreckage at the Pentagon
A chain of custody if you will, of people being witnessed to have boarded Flight 77, the radar records of Flight 77 taking off, and then dropping off the scope in the vicinity of the Pentagon, and then the remains of the passengers being found in the wreckage of the Pentagon...

You have:

Nothing....

Sorry, but I have to agree, it takes the IQ of a monkey to NOT understand the Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon.



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 10:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by pinch

Originally posted by CameronFox
Here is a copy of the Final Order document regarding Ms. Gallop's lawsuit against American Airlines:


SPreston must be on a mandatory vacation. The silence is deafening.



3 days now and nary a word from the normally prolific poster SPreston on these items. Or anyone from the CIT Headquarters.

Obviously the entire legal system, as WELL as April are in on it. Ms. Gallop is in on it specifically to discredit CIT and PffT. No other reason.

Curse you, Evil!

Burp.



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 12:00 PM
link   

posted by Pilgrum

Puts April in a whole different light to the way she was initially presented. I still feel she's entitled to reasonable compensation but it's looking like her goal is far more than that and not necessarily anything to do with truth.


posted by DrLove
If this is all legit, it seems Ms. Gallop was cleverly hoodwinked. Fortunately I didn't need her firsthand account to see that no 757 hit the Pentagon.



3 days now and nary a word from the normally prolific poster SPreston on these items


Did I see my name mentioned? Surely I am not needed here. I was waiting for one of you to post something worth replying to. Obviously all the defendents have affirmed their liability by refusing to deny the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY. Somebody has to be the defendant, so they have volunteered. Since the official fantasy tale is what the courts uphold, then April has to sue somebody within the official lie doesn't she?



Do any of you understand what you are reading? Obviously April Gallop has been getting the run around by greedy corporations who know they can extend the appeals process for years and years and years, until the plantiffs give up, and the run around by a corrupt court system which extends these processes at the behest of their benefactors.



I see several dates; 7 April 2005, October 27 2006, December 10 2007, and December 13 2007. I see no sign of settlements and no sign that funds have changed hands. It appears the appeals process is ongoing. Will that little boy suffer for 25 more years before he gets treatment for his brain injury? What is just about this? The little boy should have been in day care; instead of in his mother's office. Somebody wanted him to die.



I see nothing in your papers which leads me to believe that April Gallop and little Elijah with his severe brain damage, received one thin dime from these greedy corrupt corporations.

What I do see are a bunch of cowardly internet surfers, hiding behind their monitors, and mocking two victims of the 9-11 Attack on America. You should be ashamed. You people are little different from Troy Sexton from West Virginia who brutally attacked on the telephone WTC victim family member Bob McIlvaine and mocked the death of his son Bobby at the WTC. Mrs McIlvaine was quite upset by the unwarranted attack. 911 Family Member Attacked



[edit on 1/7/09 by SPreston]



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 01:19 PM
link   
thank you for taking the time to go through and posting all of this information.
i know how detailed and tedious court documents can be.

i'm also impressed with the determination of April Gallop.
I wish her luck with all of the bumps in the road she faces ahead.

Keep the great info coming!



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by SPreston


Do any of you understand what you are reading? Obviously April Gallop has been getting the run around by greedy corporations who know they can extend the appeals process for years and years and years, until the plantiffs give up, and the run around by a corrupt court system which extends these processes at the behest of their benefactors.


You sir, are unable to read. You underlined a letter that April Gallop wrote to the judge on the case. She filed a motion for default judgment.

Now look again at the document that I posted.

Look at the date she filed:

October 23, 2006.

Now, look at the date when her request was denied:

October 27, 2006.

4 days later. The court system didn't give her the run around. And yes, lawsuits against foreign banks can take quite a long time to complete.

That being said.... you underlined the area where April accuses Riggs bank of failing to respond to an amendment. Did you read the bottom of the letter?

Sorry to say, but April should have hired herself a better attorney. Judge Richard Connolly denied her application due to the fact that Riggs bank requested an extension until September 1, 2005 as was noted in the court dockets (#41)that her attorney didn't bother to read. Riggs Bank on August 31st, 2005 filed a motion for dismissal. So, a response was made.

What is a more obvious question is:

Why is April suing a bank in Saudi Arabia that completed transactions with two hijackers from Flight 77....

If flight 77 as she claims DIDN'T hit the Pentagon?




I see several dates; 7 April 2005, October 27 2006, December 10 2007, and December 13 2007. I see no sign of settlements and no sign that funds have changed hands. It appears the appeals process is ongoing. Will that little boy suffer for 25 more years before he gets treatment for his brain injury? What is just about this? The little boy should have been in day care; instead of in his mother's office. Somebody wanted him to die.



As truthers do. They only want to see what they want to see.

Did you read the FINAL JUDGMENT DOCUMENT?

It clearly stated that:

"WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable and has been reached in good faiths."

As far as what funds they received, you would have to ask her. April chose not to disclose it publicly.



I see nothing in your papers which leads me to believe that April Gallop and little Elijah with his severe brain damage, received one thin dime from these greedy corrupt corporations.


No, you wouldn't. Try reading them again. Or, better yet like me, file for a Pacer Account and you can get all the documentation you want. (10 cents per page)

Oh, and your appeal to emotion calling Elijah severely brain damaged is not accurate. Call your friend Craig ask him the severity of his injury. The need of early intervention is not a sign of SEVERE brain damage.

That being said, I do hope that April, in between all her lawsuits, was able to find the FREE early intervention that is provided to all American citizens for her adorable little boy.


What I do see are a bunch of cowardly internet surfers, hiding behind their monitors, and mocking two victims of the 9-11 Attack on America. You should be ashamed.


Wow, so this is what you've come to huh SPreston? Unnecessary and unfounded personal attacks.

YOU sir, were the one that requested proof. YOU sir are the one that got it. YOU sir are the one that is still denying it.

The rest of your rant is nothing short of a joke.



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 03:39 PM
link   

posted by SPreston
I see no sign of settlements and no sign that funds have changed hands. It appears the appeals process is ongoing.


posted by CameronFox
As truthers do. They only want to see what they want to see.

Did you read the FINAL JUDGMENT DOCUMENT?

It clearly stated that:

"WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable and has been reached in good faiths."

As far as what funds they received, you would have to ask her. April chose not to disclose it publicly.


Of course I did read it; as much as you posted. Obviously you cannot read, even though I underlined it for you.



April and Elisha Gallop are the plaintiffs. Judge Alvin K Hellerstein US Department of InJustice has ordered that "no payment will be made to plaintiffs, unless and until a final judgement is entered in accordance with its terms AND the time for appeals has been exhausted ....

As you well know, the appeals have still been ongoing for the past year and one month. You know that appeals with giant corporations can go on for years; especially when the court is corrupt. You know full well that the corrupt Bush Regime has been punishing April Gallop and Elisha Gallop, (and many other persons who have dared to expose the lies and corruption and criminal acts and illegal activities of the Bush Regime) for refusing to publicly support the lying Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY.

How can you pretend that you cannot see that Judge Hellerstein has ordered that no payments will be made until after the appeals priocess? 9-11 happened over 7 years ago and still no justice for a little boy who needs help. If Elisha was white, would you care more about his needs?

This is America. Elisha Gallop is one of ours and April Gallop is a disabled veteran who served her nation faithfully, and you people are betraying them.

April Gallop did not receive any funds to disclose publicly and that is why she was unable to pay her rent as shown in that piece you previously posted. Why are you people so dead set on punishing April Gallop and her little boy?


9-11 Elisha Zion Peace Foundation

Elisha Zion Gallop is the only child to survive the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon. Eight children died in that attack, but somehow, Elisha, the miracle baby survived. Elisha was just 2 months old on September 11, 2001 when tons of concrete, office furnishings and debris fell on him during the attack on the Pentagon.

His injuries included hearing loss and developmental delays due to a head injury. Although Elisha's injuries will likely interfere with his ability to take his rightful place in society the 9/11 Compensation Fund does not consider him to be a "real victim". Consequently, they do not not believe that he deserves compensation. Such compensation would allow him to have the benefit of "Early Intervention" and other such remedial services to help him catch up with and keep up with his peers.

September 11, 2001 was April Gallop's first day back at work from maternity leave. Elisha was sitting in his stroller at his mother's desk when the airplane slammed into the Pentagon. On that fateful day April had been ordered to get a document from her computer for her commanding officer before taking Elisha to the Pentagon Child Care Center.

April had just turned on her computer when the plane hit. She was accustomed to unannounced security drills, but this was different; very different. The noise was like nothing she'd ever heard. It was deafening; it was so loud that it stopped her in her tracks. Then, in the next moment she found herself and Elisha being blown across the room by the concussive force of the explosion.

As she flew through the air she caught a glimpse of the horrendous fire ball that consumed unlucky co-workers. Then the lights went out and April loss consciousness. Sometime later she woke up to the sound of Elisha's cries. In spite of the darkness, smoke and the mounds of burning debris she was able to locate Elisha. Drawing on super human strength borne of such crises petite April pulled Elisha out of the rubble and carried him to safety.

Ignoring her own injuries she helped other wounded to safety for which she has been duly nominated for a soldier's medal. Once she reached safety she fainted and Elisha tumbled into the arms of a bystander, a stranger, who commandeered a passing vehicle and escorted them to George Washington Medical Center.

In the chaos and confusion of the days following 9/11 she was mistakenly reported dead on arrival (DOA), and Absent Without Official Leave (AWOL). While the record identifying her as DOA has been corrected, the record that lists her as AWOL has yet to be corrected in the 3 years since 9/11.

That erroneous record continues to interfered with her ability to receive the Soldier's Medal for which she has been duly nominated for heroism in the face of extreme danger. While others were running away to save themselves, she took time to pull others from the rubble.

It seems that the medal is hung up in some bureaucratic snafu. This snafu has also interfered with her ability to receive relief funds from the military and private charities. It seems clear that this situation is a microcosm of the larger problem that created the conditions that allowed the terrorists to succeed in the 911 attack.

....

This young single mom lives from eviction notice to eviction notice. Her child was deemed to be in need of early intervention, but 3 years later this innocent child has not received the care that he needs and deserves. Cannon Fodder - They sacrifice, and we turn a blind eye. I hope it hasn't come to that. Her experience as a 9/11 Pentagon survivor is chilling, and as a survey published in the 9/7/04 NY Times shows, is by no means an isolated case.

....

A medical board found April Gallop unfit to return to her duties as a soldier. Consequently she was forced to give up her career and her dream of attending officer's training school. Her partial disability rating has resulted in a drastic reduction in her income. Her military pay was her family's main source of income. She was the breadwinner. When this single mother survived the horrors of the attack on the Pentagon, she had no idea that she would spend the ensuing years fighting for her life in a bureaucratic morass.

www.injury.com...


Why do you think the 9-11 Compensation Fund does not consider Elisha Gallop to be a "real victim" of 9-11? Because he was supposed to die? Because his mother was ordered to lie and refused to lie for the 9-11 perpetrators? Would you lie for the 9-11 perps CameronFox? Sure you would. You do.

Security and the Pentagon required that children went to the day care center and not their mothers' offices inside security limits. But April's commanding officer, who neatly escaped death, ordered that regulations be ignored, and Elisha and April be allowed through security. Since no aircraft impacted the Pentagon, (the actual aircraft Over the Naval Annex destroys the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY forever) apparently April was deliberately sent to an area with planted explosives in order to die.

How in the world can the 9-11 Compensation Fund rule against a little boy who was innocently a direct victim of 9-11 through no fault of his own, and you people could care less about the injustice? Where do people like you come from?



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by SPreston


Of course I did read it; as much as you posted. Obviously you cannot read, even though I underlined it for you.



Obviously YOU are the one with reading problems:

In my op:


Name Court Case No. Filed NOS
GALLOP, APRIL D. nysdce 1:2021mc00097 11/01/2002 890

Closed
03/19/2008
In Re: September 11 Litigation


See the word CLOSED??? That means the case is what, Spreston?

C-L-O-S-E-D

December 13th the Final Judgment Order was given. March 19th, 3 months later, the CASE WAS CLOSED!

There is nothing else in the docket that shows there were any other motions filed or any appeals were brought forth. CASE CLOSED SPRESTON



As you well know, the appeals have still been ongoing for the past year and one month. You know that appeals with giant corporations can go on for years; especially when the court is corrupt. You know full well that the corrupt Bush Regime has been punishing April Gallop and Elisha Gallop......word words words ...rant rant... opinions.....


See Spreston, I have already proven to you that April turned down the money from the Evil Bush regime.

It was also proven to you that the average payout for each injury at the Pentagon was $600,000.00. That is $1,200,000.00 that April potentially refused. 1.2 million dollars that evil King George was going to give to her.



How can you pretend that you cannot see that Judge Hellerstein has ordered that no payments will be made until after the ......


You are the one with the incredible imagination sir. Once again, you have failed.




April Gallop did not receive any funds to disclose publicly and that is why she was unable to pay her rent as shown in that piece you previously posted. Why are you people so dead set on punishing April Gallop and her little boy?


Appeal to emotion. I NEVER said she didn't deserve compensation. Knock off putting words in my mouth.

April DECLINED THE 911 VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND!!! What don't you get SPreston?

SHE made the decision to drag things out in court.



9-11 Elisha Zion Peace Foundation


How in the world can the 9-11 Compensation Fund rule against a little boy who was innocently a direct victim of 9-11 through no fault of his own, and you people could care less about the injustice? Where do people like you come from?



The Victims compensation fund did not rule against her. This is a fact.
Try calling the defunct Peace Foundation. The number was disconnected.

Your umpteenth appeal to emotion is once again duly noted Spreston.




[edit on 7-1-2009 by CameronFox]



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by SPreston
All right, its about time the disinfo agents and government loyalists produce the evidence that April Gallop signed an agreement with the airlines for a money settlement. No your word is worthless and insufficient.


It's been produced. Sorry, but there's simply no way to spin out of this one.

I guess you owe the "government loyalists" an apology.



posted on Jan, 7 2009 @ 06:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soloist
It's been produced. Sorry, but there's simply no way to spin out of this one.

I guess you owe the "government loyalists" an apology.


An apology from SPreston... forget it.

We G. A.'s are the devil.



posted on Jan, 8 2009 @ 08:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by SPreston
Would you lie for the 9-11 perps CameronFox? Sure you would. You do.


A wee bit disingenuous are we?

Please point out a post where I have lied. If not, be a real man and retract that statement.



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 05:13 AM
link   
reply to post by CameronFox
Cameron, please, contact me - I came looking for this because of false claims by Douglas Lind Rokke of some sort of connection to April Gallop. I also was looking for Gallop's military rank and designation. She is portrayed as being an officer, but her behavior seems contrary to her being an officer. Please, contact me at [email protected] - thank you.

Roger

 



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Bump for SPreston.

Any response to my posts?

Thank you.



posted on May, 10 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   
Not really bumping the thread here. I am curious as to what, if anything is going on with Aprils latest lawsuit?

thank you in advance!



posted on May, 11 2009 @ 09:15 AM
link   
To me it looks like an attempt to divert attention from the HARD PHYSICAL EVIDENCE in the form of Lloyde's taxi cab.

Please note that, defenders of official story are not touching the multiple threads dealing with Lloyde's taxi's pristine hood paradox.

Please also note that EVEN IF Gallup has been proven lier or greedy, it proves just that, it doesn't in any way minimize the importance of hard physical evidence of the falsehood of official story which in the official document itself.

Preston, Craig, don't waste any time, energy here. Don't get sucked into an argument which has nothing to do with your investigation.

Nice try Cameron et all, but I am not biting, I am still waiting for your views on Taxi cab's physical evidence. When can I expect your response please?



posted on May, 11 2009 @ 11:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by neil_86
To me it looks like an attempt to divert attention from the HARD PHYSICAL EVIDENCE in the form of Lloyde's taxi cab.


Looks to me that you don't pay attention to the rules around here. Stay on topic or stay out of the thread. Please.

There are too many threads that deal with the flyover fantasy. This is not one of them.

I have made my comments about Lloyd many moons ago. If you would like to search my posts, have at it.




new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join