It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phinubian
I do believe that many secrets that the U.S. had in regards to Nuclear and also advance warfighting designs and weaponry were stolen from the U.S. and U.S. TAXPAYERS, ala Israeli Spies in the Pentagon, ala Israeli Spies in the U.S. military which took place over a number of years and decades, Spies that took those secrets away to the Israelis that they decide to use against their own neighbors and enemies, it would be great if they who were being supplied had amassed all of their weaponry in good faith and on their own technological abilities instead of stealing them from the United States, I understand that a great many things were also purchased though but the top secrets were all out theft and in some instances purposely leaked by traitors, it doesn't matter if that country is consider an ally top secrets are kept for our own national security.
July 22, 2006
Weapons
U.S. Speeds Up Bomb Delivery for the Israelis
By DAVID S. CLOUD and HELENE COOPER
WASHINGTON, July 21 — The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.
The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.
The munitions that the United States is sending to Israel are part of a multimillion-dollar arms sale package approved last year that Israel is able to draw on as needed, the officials said. But Israel’s request for expedited delivery of the satellite and laser-guided bombs was described as unusual by some military officers, and as an indication that Israel still had a long list of targets in Lebanon to strike.
In one scenario, confirmed by Newsweek, Vice President Cheney considered asking Israel to launch a missile attack either on a nuclear power site in Natanz, Iran, or on an alleged Syrian-Iranian-North Korean nuclear installation in northern Syria, which might result in a retaliatory strike that would motivate a larger US military assault on Iran. Israel has already launched an air strike on the suspected Syrian site in September.
American supporters of Israel were delighted to learn that an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems-owned in part by the government of Israel-is in charge of security for the most sensitive nuclear power and weapons storage facilities in the United States.
… Israel uses sophisticated attack jets and naval vessels to bomb densely crowded refugee camps and slums, to attack a population that has no air force, no air defense, no navy, no heavy weapons, no artillery units, no mechanized armor, no command and control, no army, and calls it a war. It is not a war. It is murder."
Originally posted by Notroh est
This guy is the embodiment of what a president should be, but every one wants change instead of truth
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Alpha_Magnum
Israel has been nuclear for decades!
Just becuase Bush is desliked no need to jump on the band wagon and blame him for every little thing thats wrong in the world. sheesh yeah I dont like the guy but get real.
I can name atleast 4 other American Presidents that have helped Isarel.
WASHINGTON, July 21 — The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.
Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. - George Washington
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. -- George Washington, farewell address, 1796.
I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation has a right to intermeddle in the internal concerns of another; that every one has a right to form and adopt whatever government they liked best to live under themselves; and that if this country could, consistently with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace, it was bound to do so by motives of policy, interest, and every other consideration. - George Washington, from Letter to James Monroe, August 25,1796.
He is someone who took the Hippocratic Oath, he is more trustworthy than the rest of the politicians, especially slimeballs from areas known for political corruption such as Chicago or New York (or DC for that matter). As far as the planet getting smaller every year, the planet has been 7,926 miles in diameter for quite a long time. The shrinking planet argument is used by those who seek to take our constitutional rights away, typically environmentalists. Sorry, planet same size, overpopulation is the problem. If you want truth, listen to Ron Paul.
Originally posted by hannamtong
He is a politician, don't trust him. He seems so smart and logical why would he say " hey these people have been fighting for hundreds or thousands of years, we can't take sides". Sorry Ron but this planet gets smaller every year, If we choose not to take sides we will be forced to at some point. RP would make a great science fiction or alternative history novelist.
Originally posted by defendant
reply to post by phinubian
I trust and hope that Obama is a real man because I too, STRONGLY CONDEMN these actions taken during the last several years. Getting involved with this stinkin war in the middle east is no damn business for the U.S. and I guarentee that the taking sides with Isreal is not a religious effort but a COVERT OPERATION!! I swear to God if I were president at this time I would be taking my chances,,,,,,,,because I would blatently WITHDRAW all the troops and totally BUTT OUT of this f---ing war and have NOTHING to do with it anymore! I'm tired of all this bloodshed out there and most of it is because of nations that have no damn business in it! Open the damn borders around the Gaza strip and let the poor folks get some water and medical help and be allowed to EAT SOMETHING! I hope God strikes someone down flat for all this!
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. -- George Washington, farewell address, 1796.
Originally posted by vBreezo
Regarding the issue of who has something to gain by a global war: perhaps it is not a plan concocted by humans. There might be an alien race who, working far behind the scenes and in ways not known to the human psychological process, is able to manipulate events for their grand scheme which would, once again, bring the survivors under their domination.
Excuse me for going from rational & logical to irrational but these times are difficult to explain in ordinary, simplistic terms. Humans are behaving so irrationally; there might be an irrational cause.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by hannamtong
are you serious? he is one of very few who is giving you views and opinions and truths that are purposely kept from us. he is saying we shouldnt choose sides because its not our business. but for the jews occupying 30% of the seats in congress it is their business. do they represent you? its unbelievable what people will deny even when it is shown to them as plain as day. no wonder the great deciever is so strong in the world today.
Originally posted by D0MiNAT0R 1OOO
Why is Ron Paul talking about preemptive war.
I thought this war was about the rockets the palestinians where shooting on Israel.
Or have i missed something?
btw. it's a pitty this guy didn't become the new president of the US.