Originally posted by ProudWN
It's a mystery, an enigma why people blame an entire profession (police) when a few bad ones do something.
Mechanics beat people too, but you never hear people complain about mechanics, do you?
First Off: The Executive Branch of Government is the Law Enforcement Branch. The are not the Legislative Branch who Write Law. They are not the
Judicial Branch who Judge Law. They are not the Citizenry Branch who suffer Law for whom it is written, enforced, and judged. These are just people in
professions too. Even if just the profession of being people.
Therefore, Police, like military and paramilitary/police type individuals/ entities fall under jurisdiction of the Executive (Law Enforcement) Branch
whether localised, federal, or state. The roots of which tree are, to me, obviously rotted, vile, and corrupt. Corruption corrupts. Therefore the
entire Law Enforcement system from Joe Cop to to Mayor Mayhem to Governor Garrolous through to Mr. President are either corrupted, corrupted, or in
the process of corruption, else they'll likely fall from the tree.
Secondly: While you may feel there are only a few bad ones. It's really a matter of subjective vs. objective view. While humans may appear to be
objective, their objectiveness is bourne of a subjective mind. Therefore, whom you may consider bad (say Israel or Caananites or Palestinians) others
may consider good and vice versa. Israel invades Caanan and takes the land by force because their God said so. Caananites occupied the land first
until they were rooted out by force by the Israelites because the Caananites God gave them the land first before the new Israeli God made his Law the
Law. Move ahead to modern times. Israel again displaces Palestinians who were thetre first by Law of the Palestinian God's Law, because Israel's
God's Law said to do so. Follow me so far? Now, move back to Police. Which cop do you support? Whom do you oppose? How do they hurt or benefit your
interests? Can you objectively consider how the one who hurts you helps another, or the one who helps you hurts another? What of others similiarly
situated to, or the inverse of, you? Can you objectively see how they can all be seen in a negative light as a whole profession, or do you freeze up
with your own subjective take on the matter?
A cop who beats a thug is a hero, never mind the thug was forced into that position to fend for themselves or their family because of the bogus Laws
put in place by the Mayor who pins a medal of bravery on the cop for beating the thug against all odds. Or the cop who makes a drug or weapons
seizure, but falsifies the evidence intake report so that he can sell the seizures at a profit to the judge or prosecutor or defense lawyer or
whomever, while incarcerating the "criminal" for the same crime all dealers know they are key propogaters of themselves. Consider, except under
strict and expensive conditions may Cocaine be grown in America, yet, the DOT, ICE, COPs, and all others receive a cut in maintaining traffic and
bonuses for restricting competition. Don't think so, let a really intelligent crook try to make Afghanistan Marijuana which has the highest THC
content in the world, being the best region in the world to grow it, become the lead source of marijuana in this country and see if the Columbians
don't have American authorities shut you down with a vengeance, even though it beats Columbian Gold and the like hands down.
Yet, the same intelligent criminal could sell directly for the Columbians and never have a problem. Assuming in both cases the authorities know
exactly who this person is and exactly what they are doing. I've seen it, others have seen it, we need no proof.
Lastly: If a Policeman is naive enough to believe such atrocities don't exist, they are gullible enough to be manipulated into believing not only
that they are doing the right thing, but also, that they aren't furthering a covert corrupt agenda.
[edit on 9-1-2009 by PhyberDragon]