Rosswel Crash Technology and today:

I was answering a question in another thread I posted here

Alien Technology: It's time to release more, The Economy can use it

So I started poking around and found some interesting data to back up that Alien Technology was recovered from a crash, then was released to industry.
also


I'm not trying to be a post maniac but I thought this info should not be burried in a previous post that some would not see I thought this deserved it's own thread

Notice the timelines you'll see a major advancement in the 1950's Roswell happened in 1947.

Why would such a technology not have been used during WWII? During WWII every sort of Technology was looked at to exploit a military advantage but these were over looked?

Notice the gap? 1930 then again in 1954?

Example Fiber optics

In 1930, German medical student, Heinrich Lamm was the first person to assemble a bundle of optical fibers to carry an image. Lamm's goal was to look inside inaccessible parts of the body. During his experiments, he reported transmitting the image of a light bulb. The image was of poor quality, however. His effort to file a patent was denied because of Hansell's British patent.

n 1954, Dutch scientist Abraham Van Heel and British scientist Harold. H. Hopkins separately wrote papers on imaging bundles. Hopkins reported on imaging bundles of unclad fibers while Van Heel reported on simple bundles of clad fibers. He covered a bare fiber with a transparent cladding of a lower refractive index. This protected the fiber reflection surface from outside distortion and greatly reduced interference between fibers. At the time, the greatest obstacle to a viable use of fiber optics was in achieving the lowest signal (light) loss.

Here you have a huge gap 1917 then all of sudden in 1954 advancement.

Example L.A.S.E.R.

The name LASER is an acronym for Light Amplification by the Stimulated Emission of Radiation. In 1917, Albert Einstein first theorized about the process which makes lasers possible called "Stimulated Emission."

Before the Laser there was the Maser

In 1954, Charles Townes and Arthur Schawlow invented the maser (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation), using ammonia gas and microwave radiation - the maser was invented before the (optical) laser. The technology is very close but does not use a visible light.

On March 24, 1959, Charles Townes and Arthur Schawlow were granted a patent for the maser. The maser was used to amplify radio signals and as an ultrasensitive detector for space research.

In 1958, Charles Townes and Arthur Schawlow theorized and published papers about a visible laser, an invention that would use infrared and/or visible spectrum light, however, they did not proceed with any research at the time.

Ruby Laser
In 1960, Theodore Maiman invented the ruby laser considered to be the first successful optical or light laser.

Not much of a prehistory there just came out of nowhere in 1958

Example :Carbon Fiber

History of Carbon Fiber
In 1958, Dr. Roger Bacon created the first high-performance carbon fibers at the Union Carbide Parma Technical Center, located outside of Cleveland, Ohio.[4]The first fibers were manufactured by heating strands of rayon until they carbonized. This process proved to be inefficient, as the resulting fibers contained only about 20% carbon and had low strength and stiffness properties. In the early 1960s, a process was developed using polyacrylonitrile (PAN) as a raw material. This had produced a carbon fiber that contained about 55% carbon and had much better properties. The polyacrylonitrile (PAN) conversion process quickly became the primary method for producing carbon fibers.[2]

Lets look at the Inetgrated circuit, Father of the Microchip 1958

Example : Integrated Circuit

Jack Kilby, an engineer with a background in ceramic-based silk screen circuit boards and transistor-based hearing aids, started working for Texas Instruments in 1958. A year earlier, research engineer Robert Noyce had co-founded the Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation. From 1958 to 1959, both electrical engineers were working on an answer to the same dilemma: how to make more of less.

In designing a complex electronic machine like a computer it was always necessary to increase the number of components involved in order to make technical advances. The monolithic (formed from a single crystal) integrated circuit placed the previously separated transistors, resistors, capacitors and all the connecting wiring onto a single crystal (or 'chip') made of semiconductor material. Kilby used germanium and Noyce used silicon for the semiconductor material.

Another good example from the 1950s

Example : Night Vision

Where Did Thermal Imaging Devices Originate From?:
Thermal imaging devices were first developed for military purposes. According to Bullard Thermal Imaging, "In the late 1950s and 1960s, Texas Instruments, Hughes Aircraft, and Honeywell developed single element detectors that scanned scenes and produced line images. These basic detectors led to the development of modern thermal imaging."

Superconductor 1957

Example : Superconductor

Mysteries of Superconductors - BCS Theory
In 1957, scientists began to unlock the mysteries of superconductors. Three American physicists at the University of Illinois, John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and Robert Schrieffer, developed a model that has since stood as a good example of why superconductors behave as they do and expressed the advanced ideas of the science of quantum mechanics. Their model suggested that electrons in a superconductor condense into a quantum ground state and travel together collectively and coherently.

It took a long time to backwards engineer the technology that was found back then.

I left out the obvious military examples that the US has developed and deployed I'm pretty sure either you or somebody you know have seen those demonstrations

In conclusion some things have taken longer than others to analize then develop we are starting to see the direction of this further release of technology here.

This by far one of my favorite it seems to have just popped out of nowhere with no real history and yet it is the direction we are headed

Example : Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology, which is sometimes shortened to "Nanotech", refers to a field whose theme is the control of matter on an atomic and molecular scale. Generally nanotechnology deals with structures of the size 100 nanometers or smaller, and involves developing materials or devices within that size.

I'll leave you with a few videos to watch and ponder what else we could be doing with this technology and how it should be helping us out of this global crunch!

NanoTech

Ultraconductor

[edit on 22-12-2008 by SLAYER69]

I'm not exactly sure how alien technology is going to keep my 401K money from vanishing. But I don't have anything against giving it a try.

But it's going to take the stuff that never made it into the mainstream to generate new industry. Like that "living" material the ship was built from that allowed the time travelers to "think" themselves into this reality.

We don't have that stuff in production anywhere that I know of. That might generate some new excitement in the markets. Otherwise, it's all just insanity driven by the index funds.

reply to post by SLAYER69


Rubbish. Pure nonsense. All those technologies you listed have clear paths of development spanning across many fields and technologies which eventually resulted in the inventions depicted, just because you like to post horted, cut off and truncuated versions of their history just to give the impression of alin intervention is no excuse.
Furthermore just because something was invented after WW2 and not prior is not any indication of alien involvement, just the fact that it wasnt yet understood. After world war 2 alot of progress was made in technological fields as the allys strted scooping up scientists like girls at last call in a singles bar, this coupled with the fact that the soviets then launched SPUTNIK, the world became engrossed by a technologcal race and such began.
Furthermore your own argumnt of "well wouldnt the government wat to use it, why didnt t get used during world war 2" works aginst you as well, a if we did have alien technology why arent we using it to kick the crap out of Al Qaeda?

Furthermore you make the fallacy of assuming that just because we have a piece of technology means we should have mastered it completely, such as in your assertion about not using lasers during ww2, when you conviently ignore the fact that while lasers were known, No one had ever made such a laser that they could weaponize it, even now, weaponized lasers are in their utmost infancy but you seem to ignore all this in favor of presenting the image of ET supplying us with tech, again the
"we humans are too dumb" argument. Insulting.

Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

Rubbish. Pure nonsense. All those technologies you listed have clear paths of development spanning across many fields and technologies which eventually resulted in the inventions depicted,

cool post your answers to the things I've posted and I'll listen nothing is written in stone


[edit on 22-12-2008 by SLAYER69]

reply to post by SLAYER69


sorry i dont think that you have proved your case that these were technologies provided to us by aliens.
unless you actually have access to the alien that provided the technology and can factualy and conclusively show that humans could not have thought of it without alien intervention....
what evidence are you basing this idea on ? what you have provided does not confirm you hypothesys.
why couldnt humans develop this technology?

Originally posted by optyk phyba
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

sorry i dont think that you have proved your case that these were technologies provided to us by aliens.
unless you actually have access to the alien that provided the technology and can factualy and conclusively show that humans could not have thought of it without alien intervention....
what evidence are you basing this idea on ? what you have provided does not confirm you hypothesys.
why couldnt humans develop this technology?

Fair enough

view the thread link I posted above


[edit on 22-12-2008 by SLAYER69]

reply to post by SLAYER69


the information you have provided is very interesting. i am a tech head and my uncle is a geologist / biochemist so i am familiar with some of it. with bigger and better computers available, many more ideas will reach fruitition in a shorter period of time.
the human brain is such a wonderful thing, its let us reach for the stars we have gazed upon for thousands of years.

here is a link to csirac the aussie computer (my favourite computer)
museumvictoria.com.au...