posted on Dec, 20 2008 @ 05:47 PM
I tend to reckon that interaction between the experience of abductees and their kidnapper/researchers is much like anything else in the trends around
us.
For instance, in the construction industry, at some point in time, someone got their skull smased-- then, as a 'society', to show our 'care' of
responsibility and to avoid the negative impacts that came through the whole 'blaming' process, hard hats and labor insurance.
It is not a well spelled out parallel. The gist is there.
Taken in context of the "abductee" experience changing from laying on the table with no pain relief, to growing into a 'calming experience' and
'tours of the ship', ect. It is just good business. A phenomena much like hard hats and L & I.
There must have been a catalyst. And maybe it was like the construction industry which has gone on for centuries without all these 'safety' rules.
And now they are here, after too many complaints and a rise in the *value* of life.
*also it is more convienient to reuse a happy employee, than train a new one everyday; and, a happy emloyee makes fewer complaints, lives longer,
gives positive review by word of mouth, those kind of things.
Applying it to the abduction theory....we don't have to think of alien as *alien*.
People, societies, races, grow, develop, change, improve, decline, conquer, disappear, ...evolve. It is written all over history. So, I don't think
it is so much that we are more imaginative, as much as I believe the situation and environment of abductions has actually evolved in front of us due
to the cyclical relationship, just as we evolve and change and move around-as a rule.
What actually happened? Shrug. It would be interesting to know. But I haven't heard of any sociology books by Grays about their growth, contact,
developments, errors, and successes when dealing with the humans planet of Earth. lol!
Speculation.