posted on Dec, 19 2008 @ 11:17 PM
reply to post by Jkd Up
In the course of my research for the Real vs Artificial Christmas Tree debate, I've come across a lot of information on this topic that's not as
light and goofy as what gets presented there.
Here's just one link, I have lots
more
Nearly all the environmental sites I visited recommend real trees over fake trees.
Christmas trees are farmed, so you're not cutting down "natural forests." For every tree harvested, an average between 2 and 3 new trees is
planted. During their lives, they function as a carbon sink, and after you're done with them they can be recycled into mulch either on your own or by
the municipality. They are grown in all 50 states, so it should always be possible to find one grown locally to you, and farmers markets and the like
will often offer organically grown christmas trees.
Fake trees are mostly made of PVC (polyvinyl chloride), which does not ever break down – those trees stay in the landfill forever. The manufacturing
process produces lots of nasty runoff, including using lots of lead. Not all the lead is extracted from the trees in the manufacturing process, and
after about six years of use (less than it takes to save money by using fake trees) many PVC trees begin shedding lead-bearing dust.
They especially recommend you not use older trees, and that you wash your hands and arms after handling them
The vast majority of fake trees are made in China. There are reports from political prisoners who were used as slave labor in tree-making factories,
and of course the hazardous chemicals used in the manufacture mostly end up as runoff into the groundwater.
For another argument on why you shouldn't buy artificial, it is my contention in the debate that MemShock posted a link to that they are involved in
a hideous brush-makers conspiracy to cover our landscape (and soon Mars) with these: