Career Army officer sues Rumsfeld, Cheney, saying no evacuation order given on 9/11

Perhaps we could bring to light that our courageous Sec of Defense Don Rumsfeld left his post while the nation was under attack. Granted he was helping with survivors but surely a commander knows you do not leave your post to help with the wounded!

If you believe the official story then Don Rumsfeld could not possibly known the scope of the attack! The planes could have been a diversion for some larger operation. But he left his command post and was not reachable for some time!

It is a FACT that Cheyney gave Authorisation for planes to be shot down WITHOUT PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL.

This has been completely established as undeniable fact is completely illegal, only the President is allowed to give this command.

The telephone conversations recorded, tracked, witnessed or otherwise all point to this (please see the new book "Angler" which details this [Angler being the CIA code name for Cheyney).

Just thought you might like to know.

its official... the pentagon strike was not an airplane!!! anyone that still continues to argue that it was not is going to be liable for treason and aiding and abeting war criminals.

Originally posted by NuclearPaul
This will be interesting. Here's some evidence of Cheney's negligence. If she gets more good evidence like this, she may have a case because they knew what was going on and deliberately did nothing to stop it.

That testimony right there from the transportation secretary..should be enough to put cheney away for life. here it is.




[edit on 18-12-2008 by thefreepatriot]

reply to post by TrueAmerican


wats a few 1000
dam basterds at the UN

Since it's a civil suit, all the money won by the plaintiff will have to come out of Cheney's and Rumsfeld's pockets.

Here's hoping the family wins all of the money Rumsfeld and Cheney made off the war.

Originally posted by Darthorious
If it actually came to a trial (which I highly doubt it will due to the sensitive nature of it all) chances are a settlement would be reached and who knows they could offer them 1 billion dollars to keep their mouth shut, that's assuming they have got something here the govt. doesn't want in the public eye.

This is what kills me. We (we being the majority of people in the U.S.) have been programmed to use the 'due to the sensitive nature of it all' phrase. Meaning that it is a national security issue.

WHAT IS? That is what I don't get. These criminals have used the 'national security' blanket way too often. The only reason for withholding ANY information about the events of that day is to cover up anything that they may have done to make it happen. Period.

This will indeed go nowhere. And for the guy that says that Rumsfeld wouldn't endanger himself and others, well, you need to look at his history. First, his pharma connections and the drugs he has pushed on the people. Second, if (and I will say "IF") he was in on the events of that day he would know that his office would NOT be hit. Why would he have to worry?

But why the need to label her as an officer when she is not?

This is eye opening news.

The wormhole just got a little deeper.

How much information will it take to make people believe?

Expect to see more military people to speak on issue related to 9/11 and OIF.

This will be the first step, the years following with be outspoken.

Please - Please - Please let this go into discovery. I'm thinking positive.
I have to. This administrations deeds need to be outed on a daily basis.

reply to post by TrueAmerican


This is truely one step forward! Rumsfeld, Cheney, these guys are crooks and Skeemers! But they keep on getting away with crimes. And they keep using loop holes like this to break a case.

Spc. Gallop also says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office.

Okay now she is going vs the offical story. Which we all know is not true.
But. It creates it as a "conspiracy theory" and denied by those who take their sources from the MSM.
So this lady will be labeled a truther, aka Terroist. and not have a leg to stand on with this case, sadly enough.
Why did they have to quote those words? I think they already had enough to make a case. Without evening bothering with I dont think a plane hit.. Granted the truth should be known, but these guys.. again crooks and skeemers. They have pardon powers, and granted to be above the law..

There we go. I hope she doesnt just settle on this. Its about time we get what happened on 9/11 out in the open whether you believe it was a conspiracy or not. Lets get all the evidence in the open in a court of law. I really really hope this goes through. The MSM seem to not want to mention it.

This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.

As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.

Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....

This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.

As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.

Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....

This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.

As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.

Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....

This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.

As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.

Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....

Originally posted by Total Reality
Wow, great find! star and flag for anything that has to do with cheney/rumsfeld getting screwed and 9/11 truth. I hope something comes of this. Even if it is just making some people question the official story.

It's no surprise though that no evacuation was ordered (even though they told us it was ordered) when they also could've shot down two of the planes but decided to stand down and let them hit their targets.



[edit on 17-12-2008 by Total Reality]

Exactly, even if no justice is served by the legal system, it will bring attention to the official story. Forcing the masses that are asleep, to come out of their dreamstate and start questioning out govt. If the legal system doesn't end up bringing justice though, I can see people then taking justice into their own hands.

For those that might not think it possible. Think of it this way, thousands of american soldiers died for a scam. They were duped into thinking they were serving their country when in reality they were serving only the few rich. How do you think these families and the surviving troops are going to react to this news if they found out that Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush et al. FINALLY are point blank admitting that they messed up ON PURPOSE? Personally I hope they do end up taking justice into their own hands because the legal system has stopped working for the people, and is now only working under the wishes of the rich, and not the people they were sworn to protect. So now the only way to solve this issue is to take justice by force from those that choose to ignore their people.

I know I posted this somewhere else, but I believe this interview on Hardball to be very important for those here who haven't seen it yet and it shows the kind of attitude our leaders have and the utter disregard they have for our american soldiers:

P.S. if anybody has the capability of downloading youtube videos, please do so and download these videos to keep as further evidence, should the people in washington decide later on that they are going to ommit this piece of information from history.

part 1


part 2

"A career Army specialist who survived the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon, despite flight controllers calling in warnings of approaching hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was struck."

SOURCE

They must have made a correction, now she's a specialist.

Wonder if the lower rank (just above private) will affect her credibility?

Not to be combative, but seems kind of like they were sensationalizing her as upper-echelon personnel, when in reality she's pretty much a coffee-fetcher.

Also with this article, I see the "career" tag applied. If your MOS is anything besides infantry (11*), you will be a specialist when you get out of advanced individual training (right after basic). 99% chance that she was in her first enlistment. So that makes her "career"?

Wonder how the defense would play this.

Make her look like a low-rent going for the big payday? Entirely possible.

Her boss, who would be a sergeant or staff sergeant, would be at a paygrade that qualifies for food stamps, if that tells you how much she was making.

Maybe part of the implications or angles that will be seen if this ever breaks into th MSM.
[edit on 18-12-2008 by hotrodturbo7]

[edit on 18-12-2008 by hotrodturbo7]