posted on Dec, 12 2008 @ 12:08 PM
...a fair trail in court when they can not speak, write, or 'hear to understand' any known language, and nor can read any other language?
Any one who has their own language to speak, write, read, and 'hear to understand,' is not able to recieve a fair trail anywhere, correct?
Part 1-
And so the multiple choice question becomes:
What DOES, or MUST, the court do when one can not defend their self in any way in such the kind of situation:
A) Release such the one.
B) Detain such the one indefinitely, but do not let any convict the one with the "guilty" label.
C) Allow such the one to get found guilty even though it isnt fair.
Part 2-
The court is incompetent to understand one with own language rather than one is incompetent to stand trail? So why would a court send one to a psych
ward facility under "incompetent to stand trail" during when one isn't mentally ill just because they have their own language away from society?
Plus, why would a court punish one since one gets doped up in a mental ward under the mental ward's no certain release date?
And if so one didn't even learn any langauge, no matter the reason, a court should send such the one to a school to learn, not a mental ward to
get doped up and have to live with permanent damage resulting from side effects by medications.
[edit on 12-12-2008 by Mabus]