It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If the money ends up coming out of TARP, then the senators who voted "nay" basically get what they were pushing for from the beginning. Recall that originally the Congress was pushing Paulson to use the money they already gave him to "rescue" the auto makers. He acted like a petulant little bastard of a child, stamped his feet, put on a pout, and refused. If for no other reason than the fact that it will make his sphincter tighten uncomfortably and give him a bad case of acid reflux, them getting some of his little TARP funds wouldn't be that bad of a compromise all things considered.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
There is a problem there. The money LEGALLY cannot come out of TARP. TARP money was specifically authorized by Congress to be made available to FINANCIAL institutions, PERIOD.
Originally posted by ll__raine__ll
so wall street didn't bomb today. nothing "dreadful" happened.
what do you all have to say about that?
Originally posted by ll__raine__ll
so wall street didn't bomb today. nothing "dreadful" happened.
what do you all have to say about that?
Originally posted by ll__raine__ll
nope i can't but then unlike others here ... i don't pretend to know what's going on in the markets.
My friend, we long, long ago trampled all over the legality issues surrounding this. If history and the original intent of our founding fathers has any merit whatsoever in the interpretation of our laws, then the entire process of forced redistribution of citizens' monies to private enterprise is an abomination in the eyes of our law.
so wall street didn't bomb today. nothing "dreadful" happened. what do you all have to say about that?
What do I have to say about that? Fascism Prevails.