It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
The constitution doesn’t support any such “panel” you’re proposing. Hm, who’s ignoring the law of the land here?
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
The constitution doesn’t support any such “panel” you’re proposing. Hm, who’s ignoring the law of the land here?
No offense, but you're... what? 12 years old!? The Constitution lays out VERY definitely what is required to be President. Any reasonable presumption that any of those requirements are in violation should require a full redress of grievances - also required by the Constitution.
Don't worry - the adults will handle this.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com
I can think of one reason Barack Obama would want to seal his birth certificate - the existence of perinatal health conditions which might be embarrassing to the President-Elect.
For example, a punctilious physician might enter whether or not genital abnomalities (for instance, hypospadias) might have existed in the infant, or whether or not the mother suffered from conditions that might have complicated the birth - such as presence of a few diseases about which Obama might have felt his opponents would have made hay. A positive VDRL, for instance. .
Originally posted by Spectre0o0
reply to post by southern_Guardian
southern guardian...i have asked you before to show the documents that qualify him. you ignore me on this. i need a link that shows anything he claimed was transparent.
all you do is make claims without backing them up.
put up or shut up.