It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by earthchild
Ok, I'm looking at the site that someone linked above with emergency and disater information RSOE EDIS
If you scroll down to read under Earthquake events in the last 12hrs, why are there 3 big events in Australia yet they aren't listed on any other site?
The 6.1 that was in Western Australia they have listeds their source as USGS, but it's not on the USGS maps.
Any idea why??
Why do some earthquakes disappear?
The earthquake data shown here is automatically generated and despite our best efforts some glitches will create bogus earthquakes. When we find a bogus event, usually by studying the seismograms, we delete it and careful observers may notice that an earthquake has disappeared. This often happens after a large earthquake when our systems don't realize that all of the seismograms were created by a single event. In this case, one earthquake will turn into multiple "events" on the maps. In other cases problems in our telemetry systems that bring the data from our seismometers to our computers create glitches that also can create bogus events. For these reasons it is very important to remember that this data is preliminary and when events disappear they weren't real to begin with.
yes that is what it means.......
Does that mean the described quake was the one in Antarctica?
My question to you....is it even possible for people to subconsciously browse the internet or to subconsciously enter certain keyword for a webbot to pick up???....... But i'm willing to entertain this little fairytale we've got going on here so please explain to me how software can tap into my and everybody elses subconscious........that is what you are saying ,right?????
And as far as scaling the "precognition effect I had alluded to from 6 seconds to 6 months-- all I can say is this-- why not,
So my word out to you "mindcrime", "NTesla" and so on: Learn the difference between asserting that you're logical and correct versus actually being correct. Unless you're a shill, I do suppose you are interested in intellectual honesty, no?
Originally posted by Red Cloak
I also posted this in the other earthquake thread.
OK, I was finally able to get a hold of the earthquake scientist Jim Berkland, the scientist that was able to accurately predict the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake before it happened. I asked him about this issue and everything being said about it.
I was told the following (and PLEASE note that I am NOT trying to make a prediction, nor scare anyone, I'm just stating what he said):
"Based on the nature of the supermoon phase of the period in and around December 12th, 2008, and the relationship of the heavenly bodies' gravitational pull towards the mainly affected fault zones on the Earth, I am able to estimate that there is an 85% probability that a magnitude 8 plus megaquake or a series of magnitude 8 plus megaquakes will strike in the New Madrid fault zone like happened previously in the years 1811-1812. This means that within a period of time from December 12th to roughly 2-3 weeks after that there is an 85% chance that a megaquake or a series of megaquakes will hit in the Arkansas/Missouri New Madrid fault zone area."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Jim Berkland 's biographer, good friend...I am going to say that this is a rumor. I do not believe he would have said an 8.0 quake would be the result this month. Look at his forecast. Once again, after posting the below post I will post Berkland's Dec. eq forecast. Also, he forecasts for 4 regions every month; he will make a MOSS prediction sometimes but I doubt that he forecasted such a quake/mag...He is gone till Dec. 19...so no way to know for sure. But I seriously doubt he'd predict a great quake in this manner. Oh, and working with him on The Man Who Predicts Earthquakes...he would never say "heavenly bodies'" or a "series of 8 plus megaquakes."
Your answer is......."why not"...well maybe because of a little thing called proof. Proof to me we can subconsciously see 6 months into the future. I know all you want to say about quantum mechanics but those rules do not apply in the real world. If so i would like you to explain to me for instance something like superposition effecting the real world......because i'd be sitting on a beach in hawaii right now.....
Einstein ridiculed the idea as "spooky action at a distance." Quantum mechanics must be wrong, the father of relativity contended, because that behavior requires some kind of "signal" passing between the two particles at a speed faster than light. This is where going backward in time comes in. If the entanglement happens (and the experimental evidence, at this point, says it does), Cramer contends it implies retrocausality. Instead of cause and effect, the effect comes before the cause. The simplest, least paradoxical explanation for that, he says, is that some kind of signal or communication occurs between the two photons in reverse time.
1,615 km (0.62 miles) S of Albany, State of Western Australia.
Einstein ridiculed the idea as "spooky action at a distance." Quantum mechanics must be wrong, the father of relativity contended, because that behavior requires some kind of "signal" passing between the two particles at a speed faster than light. This is where going backward in time comes in. If the entanglement happens (and the experimental evidence, at this point, says it does), Cramer contends it implies retrocausality. Instead of cause and effect, the effect comes before the cause. The simplest, least paradoxical explanation for that, he says, is that some kind of signal or communication occurs between the two photons in reverse time.
Soo...basically the core concept that I'm proposing is this- the mind exploits quantum mechanical effects to a certain degree, and this is the mechanism by which the future mental content of humanity can propagate into the past and be expressed through disproportional emotional responses to the subconsciously perceived future events, albeit in a somewhat muddled way.
So, mindcrime, no, I can't "prove" it at this point. I certainly pay a bit of attention to subjects like these, however, because they provide, in my opinion, a good potential for leading us to new discoveries about how the universe works. That's all. And a lot of the people who follow this stuff aren't by any means stupid either, as you and a few others seem to insist.
So my word out to you "mindcrime", "NTesla" and so on: Learn the difference between asserting that you're logical and correct versus actually being correct. Unless you're a shill, I do suppose you are interested in intellectual honesty, no?
If anything ,it is your scientific attitude that is somewhat disappointing :
So my word out to you "mindcrime", "NTesla" and so on: Learn the difference between asserting that you're logical and correct versus actually being correct. Unless you're a shill, I do suppose you are interested in intellectual honesty, no?
Originally posted by citnaj
OK mindcrime, well, I guess I take for granted a lot of the information I soak up on a daily basis, so you may have missed this one, but it's key: time and space can be treated as indistinguishable in the quantum mechanical world,
So basically the gist of this paper is that just as quantum entanglement can transverse the universe instantaneously in the three familiar dimensions, so it happens to be that it applies to time as well.
I don't even know how to address this. It doesn't even make sense to attack that as a bad scientific attitude, because I'm asking YOU to be thorough, and a bit less dismissive...there's a lot we don't know, bro.
Originally posted by ArcAngel
I really have mixed feelings about this thread. On the one hand, I understand the reasons for posting this. She sincerely believes that she is on to something and is trying to warn people to possibly save lives.
Yet on the other, by using non scientific data and subjection, this is creating fear mongering. After reading further, it also appears as though there's a delusional mindset with the OP to want to see this happen so that there can be an "I told you so".
And in reality, where would over 15 million people go if this were true? where?
I don't believe we need any more fear mongoring ... too many people out of a job, wars escalating and international tensions rising.