It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
EPA Regulation Could Cost Farmers Millions
The Environmental Protection Agency is poised to use the federal Clean Air Act to implement a non-conclusive finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health and welfare, according to the Missouri Farm Bureau.
MFB President Charles Kruse sent a letter to Missouri's Congressional delegation asking them to urge EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to extend the public comment period another 60 days beyond June 23.
The Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service, with the assistance of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, found that 28,000 Missouri farms could fall under this proposed new EPA regulation, costing the state's farmers and ranchers as much as $522 million annually.
www.businessandmedia.org
...“However, methane gas is much more effective in keeping warmth in the atmosphere than CO2, but has a much shorter half-life,” Sensenbrenner explained. “To show you how ridiculous this is getting, the EPA has got the proposed regulation imposing a cow fart tax of $175 a year on every head of dairy cattle in the United States and $80 for beef cattle, $20 per head of hogs.”
The Wisconsin congressman didn’t have a technological solution for livestock greenhouse gas emissions.
“I don’t know if we’re supposed to develop the technology to strap a catalytic converter on the back of a cow,” Sensenbrenner quipped...
It would require farms or ranches with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to pay an annual fee of about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and $20 for each hog.
The executive vice president of the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, Ken Hamilton, estimated the fee would cost owners of a modest-sized cattle ranch $30,000 to $40,000 a year. He said he has talked to a number of livestock owners about the proposals, and "all have said if the fees were carried out, it would bankrupt them."
Originally posted by JacKatMtn
UPDATING...
“I don’t know if we’re supposed to develop the technology to strap a catalytic converter on the back of a cow,” Sensenbrenner quipped...
Originally posted by bigvig316
I mean what is next, taxing you to breath the air. Taxing you per breath.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by tristar
Economy - Ha!
Don't you care about the environment?
How can you just stand by while mother earth gets raped?
Humans are horrible dirty evil things and must be made to pay for their parasitic existence.
If we weren't such blood-thirsty beasts who lusted for carbon-producing, fart-making animal flesh, this fee wouldn't be necessary.
Haven't you read the guilt-propaganda?
I joke.