wow. i ask of those reading this thread to make sure you read through my replies to the op. thank you
first of all, if this story was true chris woud've been arrested.
it is true,and he was not arrested. im sure it was omitted from the video, but i would like to believe they still at least questioned chris after the
incident. especially considering it was only a month after chris went to the base, that it was attacked.
second, the video states there were 3 other terrorist attacks that month on military bases. what does this say about it?
it says people were attacking bases. so what? what does that have to do with chris's premonition? ooooh, its because most people believe that you
could easily deduce that another terrorist attack was going to happen, considering 3 already happened, and that chris's premonition was probably just
a coincidence. i will address the fallacy in logic behind that later, and also keep in mind, the key word is, probably. there is no way to prove it
was coincidence, or not, but wait, we do have more evidence that it was not a coincidence, because chris's dream hit it to the T. he saw terrorist, a
bomb, and photographic equipment, and what happened, terrorist bombed a building holding the photographic equipment on the base.
also considering chris's track record, which i will address later, it was highly unlikely that it was just a coincidence, that a very sane individual
had a pretty precise dream of a bombing that happened.
last, this does only proves my theory even more. an attack on a military base by terrorists if a possiblity for anyone that watches the news. he may
very well have seen a movie or watched a news show of one of the other terrorist attacks and had a dream about the nearest base to him. or the one he
was most familiar with. there aren't many details in the story.
i mean, seriously. okay, so for one, chris has a solid track record, especially considering he worked for scotland yard for two decades helping out
with counter terrorisim. possibilities are just that, possibilities, and if he had randomly went to a base and said, another building will blow up, at
some point in time in the future, and with no other details, or a track record of having these type of premonitions, then yes, chris robinson would be
no more than another paranoid individual, but that is not his track record, nor is it the case.
4 photographers were killed, chris did not know about the other three. this proves my theory even more.
PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD. chris's dream showed him 4 DEAD PHOTOGRAPHERS. you watched the clip, right? jesus christ! he said he saw, 4 dead
photographers
bees swarming around her family
seaside place
salt water will damage the lens
and f4.
4 photographers died, the bees must had represented pending death, he was filming marine women at the beach the day before he was killed (seaside),
and the CAMERA LENS HE WAS USING WAS AN F4 LENS.
do we have the abilities as humans to better understand our world than we currently understand? yes. does this mean that people are predicting the
future? no. again, both of these cases support my theory that they had prior knowledge of the people/events involved and already had a firm worldly
understanding of these events.
you have no support of your "theory". whatever theory that is, because i dont see one. we do not understand time, space, gravity, CONSCIOUSNESS,
etc... but yet your sitting here typing as if science has the authority to speak in absolutes, as if we have proven anything in our reality. we have
yet to 100% prove anything, and probably never will. i think we should stop our pursuit for absolute proof, because it will never present itself for
many reasons were scientifically aware of. although they may show themselves as theories within our books, that are accepted by many, and revolted by
many, we actually do have very good philosophical and scientific models to help better understand our world. its just that these models dont support
some of the mainstream views of our existence, and will continue to not really get shared with the same daylight as other mainstream beliefs on how
our world works.
plus, well the solid truth is, if what many believe is true, you're god, playing the role of a dumb down consciousness. now, we cant go proving that
people can manipulate reality like the matrix, now can we. nope, but it still doesnt stop the pursuit. there is already enough information out there,
and at this point its just about suppressing it. not in the sense that you cant get it, but in the since that it will not be spoon fed to you through
our education systems, or the tv most people sit in front of for hours a day.
my friend joe is an alcoholic. i see joe drinking. i think joe may get into a car crash and tell him not to drive. joe dies in a car crash. i did not
"predict" the future. i simply realized this possibility as being very real based on the circumstances and my knowledge of the world.
predicting a logical outcome is not the same as precognition. people who have these visions or dreams, are seeing them, and are seeing them in more
detail then what would be readily available through simple logical deduction. that should be obvious.
for some reason there is a boundary between common sense and psychic poewr. you will dismiss my example about joe because it is ordinary and is common
sense yet you will attribute psychi powers to the situation that you do not understand. both are the same thing.
really, because common sense is not measurable, or testable, it is basically just a belief. some people say that its common sense that human beings
cant fly, but that is merely a belief based off of their KNOWING knowledge of people being able to fly. key word is knowing, because even if a
physicist with a phd claims that human beings cannot fly, and that it is common sense, he is really just basically saying that, contrary to the fact
that i cannot 100% say its true that humans cant fly, due to our lack of knowledge of reality itself, im still going to say we cant, because i FEEL it
makes sense, and other people, to whom probably dont have the knowledge to even say it makes no sense, say its not common sense, not that it may be
technically impossible.
to be continued....
[edit on 6-12-2008 by jimmy1200]