It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lhote’s round-headed denizens of the Red Planet were depicted by the primitive cave artists as wearing suits strongly reminiscent of those worn by our own astronauts on the Moon, down to the detail of the boots. Several hundred such drawings exist, scattered over many miles of desert: strange helmeted and figures with antennae, often floating in weightlessness as if the artist had been able to witness one of our modern space walks.
“In the photos, we clearly see "Who repulses the Nine Bows," which figures in some of the Two-Ladies names of Seti I, replaced by "Who protects Egypt and overthrows the foreign countries," a Two-Ladies name of Ramesses II. With some of the plaster that once covered Seti I's titulary now ..”
“The "Nine Bows" refers to the _nine traditional enemies of Egypt_, so an alternate (though not literal) translation of the phrase is: "Who repulses the Nine [Enemies of Egypt]…
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Ms. Katherine Griffis-Greenberg, from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (USA) has provided the following information: “In the photos, we clearly see "Who repulses the Nine Bows,"
Hilarious. Thats sure going to make me change my position on them
Originally posted by warrenb
bugger off
your not contributing anything of interest or intellect to the thread
Originally posted by warrenb
We already know what the inscription is. You think this is the first time we see it and you think that you are presenting something new or that you are doing anyone a favor with your posts?
Originally posted by warrenb
It doesn't contribute anything to the point of the thread and makes it a real mess for those who actually find the topic of interest. It's a shame that this happens.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by warrenb
Howdy Warrenb
So your opinionf people making fake claims, taking things out of context, misrepresenting evidence and basically hiding what they don't want others to know - just to support their own limited view point is okay?