Ancient Extraterrestrials

Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by Harte

 

If the world should fall in some disaster, how much of the data we`ve saved on fragile computers do you think will survive to be recovered in a thousand years?

Now there's the makings of a conspiracy I can sink my teeth into. Education is controlled top down, people today are taught to think in terms of for the the group and as a team, individualized intellect is to be frowned on at all costs, which is why the founding generation of the US as a whole were far more intellectual than the comman citizen of today. This way top up centralized hierarchies can set policies in the many areas of expertise and knowledge without needing to micromanage the bottom, who will as a matter of not going against the grain will pretty much regulate themselves. The top minority doesn't care what items the bottom majority chooses to consume, just so as the overall mindset is one of thinking as a global woprkforce rather than any real ties or loyalty to any specific boundary and only the promotion and advancement and success of those willing to sign on and promote those top down policies. The Uniform Standardization of the Earth we'll call it. You give them computers and they transfer all the knowledge they can from the physical world to this virtual, then, once most of the world's knowledge has been collected on these, as you call them "fragile" devices, a prearranged or forseen tragedy wipes out and destroys all the saved data, plunging the world into a knowledge blackout. How do you get an informed people to surrender their knowledge so you can erase it and write it as you would have it for all future generations? You ask them for it. What happens to hard file records after scanned and uploaded to the new computerized systems? As a rule, they are destroyed.

I have always believed in this theory. From the readings of Sitchin to Danikan, even my foray into NASA and occult worship. It seems that the ancients were actively in contact with 'gods' and were heavily influenced. It just pains me to see the modern world so dilluded with material desires, I myself am guilty of such pleasure. But knowing more about the ancients is the closest we can get to not just understand, but shape the future.

reply to post by Harte


I find your explanation very weak. For one, I do not see any nebty prefix in the carving. Two, while I know it is true that many engravings were re-engraved in Egypt, there is no evidence that it was accomplished by 'filling in' an older one with plaster or some such mortar. Third, what an amazingly remote coincidence that all of these futuristic images just HAPPEN to appear in the same location.
This is just another feeble attempt to dismiss things that scare the hell out of the spiritually constipated and intellectually arrogant.

[edit on 22-5-2010 by TheArxmaster]

Originally posted by TheArxmaster
reply to post by Harte

 

I find your explanation very weak. For one, I do not see any nebty prefix in the carving. Two, while I know it is true that many engravings were re-engraved in Egypt, there is no evidence that it was accomplished by 'filling in' an older one with plaster or some such mortar. Third, what an amazingly remote coincidence that all of these futuristic images just HAPPEN to appear in the same location.
This is just another feeble attempt to dismiss things that scare the hell out of the spiritually constipated and intellectually arrogant.

No arrogance, just the facts.

If you truly don't see that this is part of the five-fold titulary, then that only means you didn't look.

It must be you that is afraid here.

Afraid that you've been wrong. Afraid to admit that you don't know what you're talking about.

Below is the five-fold titulary of Senusret:


And here is the panel of glyphs in question here, which was changed by Ramesses II to reflect his own title, rather than that of his father Seti I:



A larger view of the same panel shows even more duplication of glyphs, as the phrasing for each titulary is similar:



If you still can't see it, it's only because you refuse to.

Harte

[edit on 5/24/2010 by Harte]

reply to post by Skyfloating


it is interesting if it is true,more evidences is needed.

ALIEN MOVIES ALL OVER CABLE CHANNELS! WHY?

Originally posted by bobw927
ALIEN MOVIES ALL OVER CABLE CHANNELS! WHY?

I dont know.....people like to watch them?

Originally posted by PhyberDragon
reply to post by spacevisitor

 

If people struggle with the idea of whether aliens are real while the aliens are in fact visiting their planet, could not be assumed that people struggled with whether a GOD or GOD's existed even as that GOD was visiting them?
The BIBLE certainly makes a case for this, how many times did the Lord (singular or plural I don't care which) have to appear to them and many still skeptical walked away.

Hi PhyberDragon, here are some of my thoughts and views about that.

For both groups of people it is in a way the same problem or difficulty for a better word, the ongoing struggling to find out the undeniable right answers to those questions I mean.

For instance, how come that one person is convinced that we are being visited by alien beings and the other is convinced we are not, or how come that one person is convinced that there is a God and the other is convinced there is no God, despite they are able to look at the same information and/or bible.

Could it be that that is because it depends on the level of awareness those people have?

So, could it be that one person has another level of awareness then the other?

And could it be that for some reason one person is "allowed" to have another [higher or lower] level of awareness then the other?

And then the most important question, who decides that then?

Would we ever to be able to answer all the questions with the undeniable right answers?

I don’t know, but I have nevertheless made up my mind about it all.

reply to post by spacevisitor

And could it be that for some reason one person is "allowed" to have another [higher or lower] level of awareness then the other?

And which has the "higher" level of awareness?
(as if I didn't know what your answer will be).
You're sounding a trifle elitist.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spacevisitor

 

And could it be that for some reason one person is "allowed" to have another [higher or lower] level of awareness then the other?

And which has the "higher" level of awareness?
(as if I didn't know what your answer will be).

Well you make me curious, because you imply that you seem to know my answer to that question, what will my answer be then and why do you think that?

reply to post by spacevisitor

Never mind what I think. What do you think? You're the one who said it, you're the one with the opinion.

I don’t know, but I have nevertheless made up my mind about it all.

Do you think those with a lower level of awareness have the "right answers" or those with higher?

Originally posted by spacevisitor
reply to post by Phage

 

Never mind what I think. What do you think? You're the one who said it, you're the one with the opinion.

So it’s obvious that you do not know my answer to your first question, does that imply that you where only boasting?

Originally posted by Phage

Do you think those with a lower level of awareness have the "right answers" or those with higher?

Never mind what I think. What do you think?

reply to post by spacevisitor

I think you believe that those with "higher awareness" have the answers. I think that you believe you are one of them.

How'd I do?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spacevisitor

 

I think you believe that those with "higher awareness" have the answers. I think that you believe you are one of them.

How'd I do?

Not so good, it only proofs again that you have no idea of what my answers would be.

I think that those who have a "higher awareness" are closer to the undeniable right answers to those questions I mentioned in my earlier reply to PhyberDragon.

reply to post by spacevisitor

Color me wrong then.
You win.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spacevisitor

 

Color me wrong then.
You win.

Why would I color you wrong, because it has in my opinion nothing to do with winning, but everything to do with respecting each other’s opinion, despite they can be very different.

Originally posted by spacevisitor
Why would I color you wrong, because it has in my opinion nothing to do with winning, but everything to do with respecting each other’s opinion, despite they can be very different.

The majority of your posts in this very thread make up a large body of evidence that tends to invalidate what you say in this one, single post.

Maybe that's why.

Harte

I've always wondered about the city of Petra, Jordan... To cut those buildings out of the mountains was an almost unbelievable achievement, even if undertaken today. I'm not saying aliens created Petra, but put it this way - I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

Thanks for the HARD work and HARD evidence Sky . I enjoyed reading through these 34 pgs the past few days during my spare time. The one thing you have to remember is that skeptics are stubborn and the only way they will believe anything is if an alien walked up, knocked on their head, and said "Hey I did do that, well actually my brother did, but..." If the evidence you have provided did not wake them up then they are going to be sleepwalking for a very long time. I bet if we are visited again, knowingly and openly, they will STILL say "So what does that prove?" Ugh... I have seen some very valid points and I'm just glad everyone stuck to the subject... (sarcasm trolls) I personally feel that the Mayan Calendar could be notice of when they are going to return. The ancients were fascinated with the sky and mathematics, so who is to say that they knew something bad was going to happen, were aided in leaving the planet (which several other civilizations disappeared too), and left clues as to when they will return? There isn't. Plain and simple because all anyone can do is speculate. I find the info on the crops the best evidence though and loved the layout. Also remember that Einstein said that life repeats itself so to believe that we would be able to find anything more credible is unrealistic. Anyone who has watched the series Life After People would know that EVERYTHING goes back where it came from, eventually... so what we have been able to find so far should be luck in itself. Either way you are going to find someone who agrees and someone who disagrees. That's the beauty of human nature. We do not think alike and therefore not everyone is going to agree on things.

I look forward to reading more of your posts in the near future. Stars and Flags ALL THE WAY!!!

This is a great thread... i am only about half way through reading it and recently stumbled upon this video... just wanted to share.

www.youtube.com...