Evidence that Mumbai attacks were anglo-american operatives

still waiting for more credible proof that Americans were involved. having blonde hair and light skin does not necessarily equate with "American". Sheesh.

reply to post by irishgrl


Blonde hair, light skin....

The Hitler Youth! I knew there was something shifty about those kids

Originally posted by checkitb4uwreckit
reply to post by poet1b

 

you might want to keep your replies to 1 or 2 paragraphs nobody is going to read the essay that you just posted here....

I read it, but then I am capable of reading substantial amounts of information and digest it without losing interest and wandering what Britney is up too.

Can you?

As for the topic, what a bunch of crock. If a western agency was going to plan this attack, why would they use White guys? Talk about a bungled operation!

Also, how on earth do you convince western Agents to go on a suicide mission? It's not exactly the done thing unless you have no other option and no way out. Suicidal attacks tend to originate in other cultures with notions of Honour and Martyrdom, such as Asia and the ME.

Originally posted by mind is the universe
reply to post by checkitb4uwreckit

 

Thanks for the thread, and source

...I'm glad we have a thread now. I just didn't post in the other thread, because I felt no one would actually come to the conclusion of the reality.
[edit on 27-11-2008 by mind is the universe]

Hi Mind,

You'll note that despite the other thread's "general public" and even at times apologist theme, I did post there under rather harsh attack. But it was worth it if some took a look at the Zbigniew Brzezinski ebooks available for free download at my signature link.

We must remember that nuclear inventory has gone missing in the USA, and is quite possibly already planted, it could even be in each of these countries. Although both India and Pakistan realize that they are being manipulated into a triggered conflict, they may no longer be there to say it was a setup. Who will then be able to prove it wasn't a first strike promptly followed by automated missile retaliation? Let us hope that Obama's Illuminati plans don't go so far as to take this opportunity to implement their population reduction measures at the same time as advancing geostrategic interests.

Hopefully it is too early to get out our Geiger counters.

Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by irishgrl

 

Blonde hair, light skin....

The Hitler Youth! I knew there was something shifty about those kids

I heard they relocated to Brazil......perhaps to get a tan?

(line 2 to avoid the 1 line taboo)

[edit on 11/29/08 by irishgrl]

Conspiricy everywhere! Get real people! In South Wales I know of a shop run by Pakistanis who look as european as can be, one with ginger blonde hair who was born in Pakistan and emigrated to the UK.
So if attackers looked white it does not mean they actually were.
I have also seen Blonde Australian Aborigines, the simple truth is wait until all the facts come in before jumping to conclusions which make no sense.

Effectively nothing is ever the truth in the corporate fear machine media, especially when it comes to terror attacks. Let's face it: How often are (strictly or primarily) religious nuts the way gung-ho organized, high firepower commando types? Or if they (or however many of them) are truly religious enough, there has to be an entirely unrevealed motivation at work. And which religion are we REALLY talking about?

Originally posted by poet1b
It's a nice conspiracy theory until you introduce reality.

Trying to launch ground invasions through the frozen tundra of Alaska, and the vast deserts of the U.S. southwest would be very foolish of the Russians. Hey, if they think they've got the salt, bring it on. As far as the growing infuence of Russians in the U.S., hollywood has tried hard to make it look like the Russian Mafia has developed a great deal of power, but that is an illusion. Russians living here in the states would far prefer to help us Americans fight a Russian invasion than go back to living under totalitarian rules.

Hi Poet,

I think you are right about introducing reality. Here is a brief reality check. from Chapter XI of Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution available for download at my signature link:

But why allow Russia to become a competitor and a challenge to U.S. supremacy? In the late nineteenth century, Morgan/Rockefeller, and Guggenheim had demonstrated their monopolistic proclivities. In Railroads and Regulation 1877-1916 Gabriel Kolko has demonstrated how the
railroad owners, not the farmers, wanted state control of railroads in order to preserve their monopoly and abolish competition. So the simplest explanation of our evidence is that a syndicate of Wall Street financiers enlarged their monopoly ambitions and broadened horizons on a global scale. The gigantic Russian market was to be converted into a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control. What the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission under the thumb of American industry could achieve for that industry at
home, a planned socialist government could achieve for it abroad — given suitable support and inducements from Wall Street and Washington, D.C.

Remember, John D. Rockefeller financed the Soviet Union Bolsheviks, and his Illuminati descendant has Zbigniew Brzezinski on the payroll and bankrolled Obama's election to the tune of $2 Billion. This was no doubt for a reason, and unlikely one of patriotism or philanthropy.

For evidence of Rockefeller's "ownership" of the pseudo communist regime of Russia, see his conversation with Henry Kissinger also available at the same signature link below this post. It appears evident that since the shift from the previous communist regime to today's modern version, China may be escaping the Bankster's control, thus prompting a war of aggression knicknamed WWIII?

reply to post by tgambill


We have drifted off topic, so I will keep this brief.

Since 1776, yes humanity has gained tremendous power, but the worlds elites have lost a huge amount of power over the average person. Democratic styled governmnets have sprang up around the world granting average people rights, slavery has almost completely eradicated, and can onlly exist in hiding. This is a historical fact supported by overwhelming evidence. The creation of the U.S. has lead to the spead of rights of mankind around the globe, it was one of the best events in history.

Yes, you have a great many of the pieces of the puzzle, but you haven't introduced anything new to me, and you aren't putting those pieces together properly. Who is behind the NWO? The IC's and the WTO, and their agenda is obvious, but like communism, their plans are always doomed to failure. RWR. 666's election in 1980 brought the elites back into power in the U.S., and they have repeated the mistakes of the early part of our century, and their international banking schemes are once again taking down the world economy.

Islam was used as a tool way back then, and it is being used as a tool once again.

reply to post by sos37


Thanks, good to know people are reading what I have written. I also ussually take the time to read through the thread, even though that tends to mean I post late in the conversation.

"Since 1776, yes humanity has gained tremendous power, but the worlds elites have lost a huge amount of power over the average person. "

*****The elites have tremendous and almost total power over the average person. They will instigate the war that will happen between India and Pakistan. They had to assassinate Bhutto because she was bringing peace. The CIA/ISI/Massad/British Intell. work together to fuel the war. It is designed so that sides will be taken at the time that WWIII starts to escalate.

Slavery is in the US and they don't know it. You have no such evidence that slavery is eradicated. The Federal Reserve is in fact the slave owner and people are not seeing it. This is why the bail out as they are buying up the debts to own people and getting ready to orchestrate another depression like they did in 1929 to prepare for the inside civil war and fuel WWIII. We have no spread rights!!!! we have created war and dissention in almost every country. What planet are you talking about? Not here. Do you want the evidence? I can boggle your mind and will.

the pieces are put together in exactly the way it has happened and for the exactl goal, a one world government. The 13 Illuminati families and followers. They are hiding within the 33rd degree Masonry [Scottish rite], Vatican, and Zionist Jews, not jews but Zionist who would sacrifice their own in a heart beat. They did in WWII.

Islam was identified as a tool and an obstacle to the NWO back in 1973 timeframe when the Trilateral commission was formed. British and American links with the House of Saud designed the Brotherhood and radical Islam to destroy Islam from within and provide the boogee man for the WWIII as planned by Albert Pike from 1850 to 1871.

Although this is technically off topic it is another segment of the same agenda that this topic is dealing with for the same end game. they will fuel the war between India and Pakistan for this exact agenda that we are speaking of. Next will be another incident that will spark more dissention between Pakistan and India.


[edit on 29-11-2008 by tgambill]

Originally posted by stumason

Originally posted by checkitb4uwreckit
reply to post by poet1b

 

you might want to keep your replies to 1 or 2 paragraphs nobody is going to read the essay that you just posted here....

I read it, but then I am capable of reading substantial amounts of information and digest it without losing interest and wandering what Britney is up too.

Can you?

As for the topic, what a bunch of crock. [/ If a western agency was going to plan this attack, why would they use White guys? Talk about a bungled operation!quote]

Is anyone saying thy were ALL "white guys". No. There may have only been one or two, and higher up the chain of command?

reply to post by Getsmart


Nice concept, couldn't think of any reason why you are wrong. I'm not sure attempts of U.S. IC's to take over Russia can be credited to Rockefeller, I think there are many major players who would have liked to see such a development. This did seem to be the course of action for awhile, and then Putin took over, and I think he has been a thorn in their side. Putin is a hard character to put a finger on, but one thing I believe about Putin, is that he is a nationalist, and he is not about to let U.S. IC's take over Russia.

China has cooperated with the IC's, but retained control of China. The Chinese are known to be shrewd business men, and I don't think that the IC's are capably of manipulating the Chinese in the way they would like to.

Then there is India, the former British colony, the dark horse that has been primarily ignored on the world scene for awhile now. India is coming into its own. The country has a huge population and considerable resources. I have believed for awhile now that India is also destinied to become one of the world's powers.

The Middle East would like to become a world power, but they lack the main component, technology. If they could absorb India somehow, this would solve the problem, but that ain't gonna happen. If the Middle Eastern leadership was smart, instead of fighting Israel, they would develop bonds with Israel, as the Israelis have the one thing they need the most, technological know how.

Yeah, India is going to start a crackdown on Muslim terrorism, and that is what they should do. Sometimes things are just the way they seem to be.

reply to post by tgambill


As a American, I have to say that we are a long ways from being slaves. While we are not living as well as we were in the seventies in some ways, in many others we are doing better. The people of the U.S. are of a culture that thrives in adversity. We are a nation of the worlds most ambitious, and have yet to be corralled. Sure, there are parts of the country that were fooled by GW and the neocons, but those are very stubborn parts of the country that are not going to do anything but what they want to do. Easily fooled yes, easily manipulated, sorry, wouldn't go there myself.

What the ICs are finding is that by moving U.S. jobs overseas, they have also lost the trust of the U.S. people. The U.S. is evolving faster than people realize.

We will have to take this subject up on another forum at some other time.

Originally posted by drummerboyG
Is anyone saying thy were ALL "white guys". No. There may have only been one or two, and higher up the chain of command?

Really?

Who thinks that, Alex Jones? Wow, so it seems some conservative religious fundamentalist from Texas has successfully completed his post-analysis before Indian security got a chance to finish. Even without stepping on Indian territory!

Man, who needs Interpol

reply to post by infinite


It's only a matter of time before Alex Jones runs from his own reflection...

That guy tries to look for some out there conspiracy angle on everything, but there is usually a much simpler and plausable explanation for these events.

Pissed off Muslims, especially in India, are nothing new and don't require some white guy controlling it.

Put it this way, Alex Jones thinks the Illuminati are out to take over the world and have scheming for years, while apparently hiding the evidence everywhere were only he can see it, such as buildings and his farts.

But consider the current state of the world, all the divisions and strife, then consider the fact that 100 or 200 years ago taking over the world would have been so much easier, what with the British Empire etc and it makes you wonder if the Illuminati exist.

They have apparently been planning this for decades, centuries even, since at least 1770 something, yet so far they have achieved the sum total of fudge all.

If they do, then they are the worst Secret Society to ever secretly socialise. I could have done a much better job at securing world domination in 1/10th of the time the Illuminati was around.

Here's a link to a news story stating that at least two of the terrorists were of British Pakistani descent. If they were of mixed ancestry they could possibly have fair skin, fair hair.

www.telegraph.co.uk...



[edit on 11/29/2008 by seentoomuch]

As I've pointed out countless times in this thread and others: Alex Jones and his supporters seem to not understand (or ignore) the British Raj and the religious implications of the partition of India.

Heck, study the politics surrounding the status of Kashmir.

Pakistani backed terrorism has been occurring in India before Alex Jones banged his head and developed a messiah complex.

reply to post by seentoomuch


Indian security forces said none of the terrorist were of British origin.

Senior Indian official has said there is no evidence that any of the gunmen who killed 195 people in Mumbai were British.

S kynews

Two versions, one is based on reports from people there on the ground, the other from authorities. Which is true?