It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
"The threat is serious, the threat is significant, and it is plausible," said Congressman Peter King, R-Long Island, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Originally posted by jibeho
I certainly wouldn't call this fear mongering. All it takes is the detection of an increase in chatter on line or perhaps a tip from an informant to increase the level of security or awareness. The timing of the warning and the attacks in India is a bit strange. Perhaps the detected threats were generic in regards to specific locations. The attackers in INdia were targeting Westerners. Who knows? Better safe than sorry.
They'll dream up a threat even without any credible evidence that such a threat exists, otherwise they'd have to get a proper job and work for a living.
"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq," Ma'ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favor."
Russia’s military chief of staff General Yuri Baluyevsky threatened the use of nuclear weapons in case of a major threat. He said that, although they have no plans of attacking anyone, they nevertheless “consider it necessary for everyone around the world community to clearly understand, that to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Russia and its allies, military forces will be used, including, preventively, the use of nuclear weapons.”