Read these prophecies, two are already occuring!

world-famous-predictions-prophecies.blogspot.com...

I find this amazing that two of these prophecies are already occurring before our eyes!

USA, Pakistan, Britain, Australia, China, France, Saudi Arabia Will become the Worst Countries Of the Century by spreading violence, intolerance, Racism, Extremism, throughout the world.

Western Nations , USA & China Will witness more Natural disasters to come, their lands will go Dry, People will burn with heat & fire, Floods, Hail & Typhoons Hurricanes Will destroy their habitat.

Followers of Islam Christanity & Sikhism Will Suffer to a great Degree as their followers Will distort their religion to great extent which will bring Only Misery & Destruction upon them. Muslims & Christians Will be left behind In Evolution Of Humans.

America UK Romania Sweden & Europe will see collapse of their society & misery.
Al Qaida will see Begining of its End from 2012 .

Archealogists Will Discover Old Fossils & civilizations.

Scientists Of The World Will Never Be Able To Find or discover New Life Forms & Alien Life in the Universe till they continue to have false belief that Alien life depends upon water & Air.

Pakistan will Continue to Spread Islamic Terrorism In India & The World & Will also suffer from it. Pakistan Will Give Bad Name To Islam & Muslims throughout the World.

Congress, Left Parties & UPA Will Loose Elections In The times to Come In India.
In The Times To Come Coastlines Of Some Of The Countries Will Submerge under with rising water levels.

Corrupt Politicians Will Be Exposed & Jailed In India. Policiticans Of India Will Weaken Democracy In India.

Life Span Of Humans will Increase In Next 50 years.

All The Predictions Of Destructions Of Earth For 2012 A.D. Will be Wronged. Mayan Prophecies Will Be Misinterpretated.

Obama will Become Next President Of USA But will Face many Assasination Attempts.

- world-famous-predictions-prophecies.blogspot.com...

This is truly magnificent, look at all of the scientists assuring that we are now able to live 1000 years +, look at all of the [unfortunate, and idiotic] assassination attempts against the President-Elect of America. Look at the recent new thread about immortal cells! I think it's fair to leave all of the prophecies on this blog open to possibility indeed!

[edit] - Added a bold to "Archealogists Will Discover Old Fossils & civilizations.", this month we have discovered a 4000 year old setting where it is agreed that civilization existed there. Search the threads here on ATS. Also uranium of large amounts has been found in Australia too!

[edit on 23-11-2008 by -zeropoint-]

the stench of bull# here amazes me.

first of all its not a prediction unless its written before these things happen. second of all these all look like the old vagna prediction but somehow changed. the predictions follow no order and seem to dodge from terrorism to aliens. life span increases every generation not a prediction scientific fact.


any prediction starting with "in the times to come" is not a prediction. it is a vague statement. its like me saying

between now and 2012 something big will happen.

tell me im wrong.

Originally posted by N. Tesla
the stench of bull# here amazes me.

first of all its not a prediction unless its written before these things happen. second of all these all look like the old vagna prediction but somehow changed. the predictions follow no order and seem to dodge from terrorism to aliens. life span increases every generation not a prediction scientific fact.


any prediction starting with "in the times to come" is not a prediction. it is a vague statement. its like me saying

between now and 2012 something big will happen.

tell me im wrong.

They have all been posted in early 2008 actually.
I won't tell you you're wrong because 2012 isn't here yet, um, duh, and that's vague, because my sister's birthday will occur before 2012, these predictions give an event, and time scale 2008-2009, so please don't try to be a smarta**? What I'm saying is these things have been posted before some events occurred that are NOT vague, and could be the product of these prophecies/predictions, whatever the hell you want to call it, it doesn't matter. The things that have recently been discovered are astounding. The only BS not worth listening to is your senseless bantering and confidence in your skepticism, these could very well be actual predictions, or not, I'm not saying one of the two, I'm just posting because I find it interesting and I found the section appropriate. Don't be so full of yourself. I'm not attributing that they have a connection, but you can't prove that they quite don't, I'm conspiring, on a conspiracy forum,....I'm allowed to do that right? This doesn't come from Vanga, she was quite accurate alot BTW, what would it matter if it did? What predictions have you came up with lately?

These all occurred in this month, the prophecies are for 2008-2009 and was posted way before all of this, I thought it was quite interesting.

Cradle of civilization found in turkey
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Massive new uranium deposit found in Australia
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Idaho students chant 'assassinate Obama' on school bus: Report
www.abovetopsecret.com...

ATF says it has disrupted skinhead plot to assassinate Obama
www.abovetopsecret.com...

....the many, many, etc.etc. no doubt more to come

Don't be so quick to call something BS, it may very well be the opposite.





[edit on 23-11-2008 by -zeropoint-]

i can easily call you full of yourself as well.

but let me get some facts here

1 who made these predictions
2 when were they made
3. what makes this source credible.

next vangna was not at all correct. i read through her predictions and 1 in every 50 came somewhat true and alot of these do sound like hers.

as for the archeological discovers that proves nothing. discovers happen all the time just look into a museum.

and you said that these were made in 2006 well then most of these can be thrown out the window.

after 2001 all Muslims were given a bad name. i also dont see any time frames here or on the website so im gonna assume you pulled 08-09 out of your ass.

Originally posted by N. Tesla
i can easily call you full of yourself as well.

but let me get some facts here

1 who made these predictions
2 when were they made
3. what makes this source credible.

next vangna was not at all correct. i read through her predictions and 1 in every 50 came somewhat true and alot of these do sound like hers.

as for the archeological discovers that proves nothing. discovers happen all the time just look into a museum.

and you said that these were made in 2006 well then most of these can be thrown out the window.

after 2001 all Muslims were given a bad name. i also dont see any time frames here or on the website so im gonna assume you pulled 08-09 out of your ass.

“i can easily call you full of yourself as well.”

Good luck accomplishing that!

“1 who made these predictions”

The blog where it’s posted, it’s a compilation and that’s the purpose of the blog, the owner or management of that blog created it. I provided the link; obviously you haven’t even read it before making outlandish bantering.

“2 when were they made”

Thursday, October 19, 2006 – but the recently revamped and renovated layout and posting update shows that it has been updated Sunday, November 16, 2008. The original posting can be viewed through the internet archive wayback machine.

“3. what makes this source credible.”

Any source is credible when they can deliver on their words, be it the most rejected bastard, or the wealthiest pig. In the case of being a prediction/prophecy, a source is credible when it shows signs of occurrences, or when skeptics like you cannot successfully provide a reasoning why an event can’t match the prediction when it’s apparently obvious and resonantly relevant to the prophecy/prediction.

“vangna was not at all correct”

Well let’s not hijack this thread, there are many threads and posts about Vanga and her prophecies, make sure read the unbiased versions, you’re probably easily sold to propaganda.

“archeological discovers that proves nothing”

Nobody said it didn’t. Skeptics like you cannot successfully provide a reasoning why an event can’t match the prediction when it’s apparently obvious and resonantly relevant to the prophecy/prediction; in that case it’s quite evident and true.

“after 2001 all Muslims were given a bad name”

Well isn’t that ironic? You’re attributing the prediction to an event, it’s quite Hippocratic that a more relevant conspiracy comes along and you want to argue about it, eh? Why is that right and anything else wrong, and why do you suddenly believe this can be true? Logic gets yah every time!

“assume you pulled 08-09”

Pardon me, it’s 2009 – 2010 but the post is tailored to 2008-2009 as posted, but you’d see that in the title of the blog itself if you just researched anything you talk about.

you know waht your right i didn even read the blog. but i did now heres a excerpt.

Hollywood Actress Britney Spears & Lindasy Lohan will Meet With Great Sorrow & Suffering.


im sorry but that makes your source as real or creidble as the insect found on my shoe. dont try to pass a website as legitimate or real if it has # like that on it. and back to vanhna for a sec. i have disproved many of her predictions using my own research so go for it try to say that she was always right. it will just add more things for me to laugh about.

truthfully, Obama will win the election but many assassination attempts will occur, is like saying this thanksgiving there will be many turkeys killed. Its not a prediction, its obvious. Regardless of his skin color, how many assassination attempts do you think occur on the President of the United States, I'm guessing quite a bunch; add in the fact that he is black, and viola you've yourself a prediction that rings similar to I predict if you add one to one you will come up with two.

America, China, etc. will promote blah blah blah. Sounds more like an opinion on the countries more than anything. It also seems to portray the international sentiment, and the sentiment within the US during Bush's admin., about how the US and other countries are portrayed. Again a dumb statement. How do we even measure that statement? It cannot be verified, therefore it can never be a fact. In order for that statement to be even REMOTELY true things would have to drastically change for the US and China in the way they treat other countries, and that won't happen (I say that because its a prediction of something to occur in the future, so you cannot use current information and qualify it as a prediction if it stays the same, that would be an assessment.)

Originally posted by N. Tesla
you know waht your right i didn even read the blog. but i did now heres a excerpt.

Hollywood Actress Britney Spears & Lindasy Lohan will Meet With Great Sorrow & Suffering.


im sorry but that makes your source as real or creidble as the insect found on my shoe. dont try to pass a website as legitimate or real if it has # like that on it. and back to vanhna for a sec. i have disproved many of her predictions using my own research so go for it try to say that she was always right. it will just add more things for me to laugh about.

Oh BTW,
I would be interested in your posting the “scientific fact”...
Where lifespan increases every “generation”….WTF?

How/why does this make “my” “source’ credible, especially when it’s true itself, I mean, just because they’re celebrities. C’mon… time to deny ignorance. At what point does a website be classified as “real” or “fake”, when the truth is displeasing to you, and no other reason? You sound like an [illiterate] self-conceited lad with no logics.

reply to post by Ryanp5555


i love you man. you bring me hope in life. and as for the life span thing look back in time when middle age was 20 years old and know when middle age is like 40 something. proof in the books my freinds





]¥[

Originally posted by Ryanp5555
truthfully, Obama will win the election but many assassination attempts will occur, is like saying this thanksgiving there will be many turkeys killed. Its not a prediction, its obvious. Regardless of his skin color, how many assassination attempts do you think occur on the President of the United States, I'm guessing quite a bunch; add in the fact that he is black, and viola you've yourself a prediction that rings similar to I predict if you add one to one you will come up with two.

America, China, etc. will promote blah blah blah. Sounds more like an opinion on the countries more than anything. It also seems to portray the international sentiment, and the sentiment within the US during Bush's admin., about how the US and other countries are portrayed. Again a dumb statement. How do we even measure that statement? It cannot be verified, therefore it can never be a fact. In order for that statement to be even REMOTELY true things would have to drastically change for the US and China in the way they treat other countries, and that won't happen (I say that because its a prediction of something to occur in the future, so you cannot use current information and qualify it as a prediction if it stays the same, that would be an assessment.)

….and you’re right indeed! The election was close by 2 points, and that prediction could’ve been off by just that, but it didn’t indeed. Was it obvious Obama was going to win the election? No, not indeed. I’m agreeing with you, but I still think it’s ignorant to make this a ground of dismissal that it could be an actual prediction [that and everything else posted], if you going to reason for this one, what about the others?

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by Ryanp5555

 

i love you man. you bring me hope in life. and as for the life span thing look back in time when middle age was 20 years old and know when middle age is like 40 something. proof in the books my freinds





]¥[

That’s not proof, you said scientific fact,
Not hearsay and wild belief
Could you post the scientific fact please?
It would confirm that you’re BS’er if you pride yourself as scientific facts


[edit on 23-11-2008 by -zeropoint-]

en.wikipedia.org...


looky looky i find the proof your turn.




]¥[

Originally posted by N. Tesla
en.wikipedia.org...


looky looky i find the proof your turn.




]¥[

LOL… Life expectancy is the statistical estimation of life expectancy based on environment, health, food, and cultural generalization, plainly. This has NOTHING to do with, or relevantly, “scientific fact that lifespan increases every generation”, in fact, life expectancy is the estimation of how long someone/group of a people will live, are you kidding me, lawl. This confirms that you’re a BS’r indeed.

reply to post by -zeropoint-


has it been studied by science? has it been proven? yes and yes scientific fact indeed. and that is besides the point. even including enviroment and science every generation does live longer then the last.



]¥[




[edit on 07/17/2008 by N. Tesla]

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by -zeropoint-

 

has it been studied by science? has it been proven? yes and yes scientific fact indeed.

It has nothing to do with increasing lifespan every generation; do you know the difference between decrease, increase, and estimation? LMAO…. Life expectancy in fact is the opposite of the “increase of the lifespan every generation”. Read the dictionary, lawl.

reply to post by -zeropoint-


for someone who seems so sure you seem to be deflecting alot of things at me. the point is that lifespan or expectancy has been increasing. the next 50 years wont be any different. now as for these predictions i still see nothing that supports them.


]¥[

[edit on 07/17/2008 by N. Tesla]

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by -zeropoint-

 

for someone who seems so sure you seem to be deflecting alot of things at me. the point is that lifespan or expectancy has been increasing. the next 50 years wont be any different. now as for these predictions i still see nothing that supports them.


]¥[

[edit on 07/17/2008 by N. Tesla]

The words support themselves
What proof do you need?

reply to post by -zeropoint-


thats great. this thread bores me. you show no proof. you show no proof and expect everyone to accept it. ive played this game before and i have learned that you cant argue with people like you. the people that find random predictions and try to encourage everyone to accept them as fact with no proof. i have better things to do.

until you show me somethign worthwhile i say good day.


]¥[

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by -zeropoint-

 

thats great. this thread bores me. you show no proof. you show no proof and expect everyone to accept it. ive played this game before and i have learned that you cant argue with people like you. the people that find random predictions and try to encourage everyone to accept them as fact with no proof. i have better things to do.

until you show me somethign worthwhile i say good day.


]¥[

You still haven't answered the question, what type of proof do you need? Three likely predictions have already came through anyway, and my intentions are not as you babble so, I'm not convincing anyone of "facts", there are really no facts involved, and that's not a bad thing at all, on a conspiracy forum. You remind me of the moronic crowd of there's no proof trolls. You trolls get bored when we don't feed you, huh?

reply to post by -zeropoint-


no, no, no. when you say the election was close by 2 points you make it sound like the electoral college votes were 268 to 270 or 269 to 271. That is not the case, it was a massive landslide victory for the democrats. The popular vote may have been within 2 points but that is certainly not what counts. I said that the election would be over by 10 pm CST, and it was, does that mean I can see into the future? No! It was CLEAR that Barack was going to kill McCain, which he did. It had been known since the primaries started that the Dems had a huge advantage over the GOP, and that never changed. I, a Republican, knew that the we stood no chance in this race in 2007, and even I could have said Barack Obama was going to be the President back when put his name in the hat for the primaries, granted I do live near Chicago. However, to most of America it was clear that there was a widespread want for a democrat in office. This was evidenced by: (i) the low approval rating of Bush, and (ii) more prominently so, the way the Dems killed in the 2006 elections. There was no chance.

The point of everything is that these are dumb predictions that are either: (a) quite apparent, or (b) biased (see my last post about China and US).

As far as the life span thing goes, if you really don't believe that the lifespan tends to go the I think you probably need to take some time and actually research, and the only reason I say tends is because of the anomaly known as the middle ages. In reality, I think you are debating that point because you just don't want to concede it even though you know its true.

Finally, I have a prediction: The Dow Jones will drop tomorrow. (see how its 50/50; which is what Baracks woulda been even as he faced off John McCain as a Prez gets assassination attempts alot, I'm sure, and his will be publicized because of his skin color).