It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
Thanks for the video, this is one I have never seen before. I can add it to my collection of evolution destroying information.
As for the Title of the post, I have some relatives I would swear were animals but, after being told that was what they were since kindergarten when they start brainwashing the kids with the dinosaurs and millions of years ago. I do not wonder why some act like animals.
Like I say in all these threads evolution is a belief/faith and a religion as you have to believe it happened. I don't think schools should be teaching any faiths or call one science. We have supposed Christian Science Evangelism and supposed evolutionary science, neither should be in our schools as science or fact. I like the way my son's 11th grade biology teacher put it in his public school here in Colorado. He tells the class this "There are two theories on the Origin of Life or where we came from, neither are provable and neither are needed for biology study". This is the way it should be in all schools, except private ones that of course can teach their curriculum as they see fit.
I do not believe in evolution, well let me clarify because this is the problem with evolutionists and Christians. I do not believe in the first 5 steps of the evolutionary processes I do believe in what they wrongly call micro-evolution, it is actually change within the species. Like a horse and a zebra can breed and make a Zorse but the offspring go back to zebra or horse. Cosmic evolution is a fairytale, chemical evolution is a fairytale, macro evolution s a fairytale etc..
Never has it been observed that 2 animals gave offspring of a different kind or species. So if it is not repeatable, observable, and within the known Laws of Science it is not Science and should not be taught as such.
I feel the same about creationism, we can not repeat it, observe it (other than seeing everything on earth), or know how life was made so it too should not be taught as a science.
As I don't think we should be teaching, brainwashing, or indoctrinating anyone's children with evolution theory on the public buck.
I won't get into all the reasons I think creationism is the answer, but I can say evolutionary theory as it is today is impossible and all the scientists know it. Evolution has been disproved at every turn to date, no fossils of intermediary animals or missing links ever found that were not frauds. But I can not prove scientifically that GOD Created either.
This site has a lot of great evolution busting info, Evolution Cruncher is the best truly scientific look at the evidence we have.
Originally posted by masterweb
video.google.com...
Examines and powerfully refutes the so-called "evidence" that man evolved from an ape-like ancestor.
Thomas Kindell is the founder and president of Reasons for Faith Ministries ( nwcreation.net... ), dedicated to equipping Christian believers with evidence for their Biblical faith. For over 25 years he has lectured on the subjects of scientific creation and Biblical apologetics. He holds a Ph.D. in Theology from International Seminary and received training in scientific creationism at the Institute for Creation Research.
Originally posted by ReelView
Ultimately, evolution is about desire driving change.
but now your going to have to supply evidence for karma and spirit
Desire is spirit under the influence of body and mind via karma and habit.
The percent of spirit here is too small. Spirit is very weak here.
got evidence?
The tendency for change is lateral or descending. Life devolves not evolves.
you have got to be kidding me
If anything monkeys came from humans
if they had shown it they would have won nobel prizes, chances are its god of the gaps and false logic sold for the masses in the hope they dont know enough to laugh
Various threads and topics like the "Skinwalker Ranch" and the books of Charles Fort have shown that like forms are being introduced into the world rather than all of them being a process of modification of an existing form.