Al-Qaida No. 2 insults Obama in new audio message

Al-Qaida No. 2 insults Obama in new audio message

www.breitbart.com

CAIRO,Egypt (AP) - Al-Qaida No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahri insulted Barack Obama in the terror group's first reaction to his election, calling him a demeaning racial term implying that the president-elect is a black American who does the bidding of whites.

The message appeared chiefly aimed at persuading Muslims and Arabs that Obama does not represent a change in U.S. policies. Al-Zawahri said in the message, which appeared on militant Web sites Wednesday, that Obama is "the direct opposite of honorable black Americans" like Malcolm X, the 1960s African-American rights leader.

Al-Zawahri also called Obama—along with secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice—"house negroes."

(visit the link for the full news article)

Here we go boys and girls.

The "testing" of Obama is already starting, and he hasn't even been sworn in yet.

Al-Zawahri did not threaten specific attacks, but warned Obama that he was "facing a Jihadi (holy war) awakening and renaissance which is shaking the pillars of the entire Islamic world; and this is the fact which you and your government and country refuse to recognize and pretend not to see."

He said Obama's victory showed Americans acknowledged that President George W. Bush's policies were a failure and that the result was an "admission of defeat in Iraq."

Huh?

Seems like someone else around here has been saying that's what Obama's weak military positions would show our enemies...

www.breitbart.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Those bloody Al-queda, they're never happy are they?

Always moaning about this and that, swapping opinions and beliefs whenever it suits them (and some creepy global agenda) and causing bother.

No sense of humour either.

it's in their worst interest if we pull out of Iraq. then they've got no justification for their acts. So, they'll hammer on Obama, send out these messages and try as hard as possible to keep us there.

It always has to be number 2. Why not number 1?

Shows real leadership when your talking smack from a cave instead of the front lines. I bet you this is one guy Obama won't sit down and talk to.

Originally posted by Crakeur
it's in their worst interest if we pull out of Iraq. then they've got no justification for their acts.

Are you somehow suggesting that our presence there gives them justification for their acts?

reply to post by nyk537


In the minds of them, yes. It would.

How so?

They were terrorists before we were there weren't they? Are they going to stop wanting to be terrorists when we leave?

I must be thinking of someone else because I've heard that we killed their 'number 2 guy' like 3 different times already? Hmmm.

Al Qaida should be carefull. If they start slinging around racial insults, particularly the "N word" then they'll have the Democrats really mad at them.

...calling him a demeaning racial term implying that the president-elect is a black American who does the bidding of whites.

Funny thing, their slur has a grain of truth to it, darn it. They shouldn't be so astute if their terrorists. Right?
Actually, Obama is so politically savvy, that he may appear at times to be "sucking up" to what should be his opponents. In reality it is just a tactic to get as many people on his side, or working with him, as possible.
AlQueda operatives could learn a lesson or two from him IMHO.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by wayno]

reply to post by nyk537


no, they won't but our presence in the middle east gives them an excuse. If we up and left, they'd need a new excuse. The old one, if I recall correctly, was our presence in Saudi Arabia. If they revert back to that cause, they might have issues with the Saudi's and I think they prefer things the way they are.

I don't think they need an excuse Crakeur.

I think their "excuse" is that they hate America and what it stands for.

They don't require an excuse or justification for their actions. They will continue to attack and terrorize others regardless of what we do or do not do. Simply ignoring them is not the answer.

They must be stopped.

Okay... we showed we are sane, Bush and Cheeney are out.

Now Islams Turn, Bin Laden and Zawahoweveryouspellit time to go..

In this way, we all win

Oh wait, Islam doesn't hold elections....

damn

Guess the world was safe from us in the long run and not these 2 Idiots...

Originally posted by nyk537

Originally posted by Crakeur
it's in their worst interest if we pull out of Iraq. then they've got no justification for their acts.

Are you somehow suggesting that our presence there gives them justification for their acts?

Yeah Im saying that. I would assume if Russia occupied our nation we would do a terrorist act or two against them now wouldnt we? The fact is if we werent over there they couldnt kill us over there could they? Also they arent terrorists they are freedom fighters. They feel that we occupy their lands and they are fighting us for their freedom. The way you and the neo con brethren define terrorists that very definition would make our founding fathers terrorists. I dont know about you but Id like to think of our founding fathers as freedom fighters fighting an occupation.

When I saw that this morning I almost fell out of my chair laughing. AQ has gotten so weak it has to resort to petty name calling. What happened to threats? Used to be 'death to infidels' now it's 'your president is a house negroe'. Ouch guys, stop we're about to give in. I guess I should stop provoking. This just goes to show you how backwards and weird these guys are. I wish Obama would fly over there and give this guy the butt kicking he so obviously deserves!

Originally posted by nyk537
I don't think they need an excuse Crakeur.

I think their "excuse" is that they hate America and what it stands for.

They don't require an excuse or justification for their actions. They will continue to attack and terrorize others regardless of what we do or do not do. Simply ignoring them is not the answer.

They must be stopped.

Your kidding right? They hate America for what it stands for? No dude they dont bomb us because of our freedoms they immigrate here in droves because of our freedoms. We tick these guys off when we get in their business and occupy their lands.

Originally posted by mybigunit
We tick these guys off when we get in their business and occupy their lands.

Oh really?

So these radical Islamists never had a problem with us before the war in Iraq?

reply to post by mybigunit


I'm sorry but before 9/11 we weren't occupying their lands. Now after 9/11 hundreds of thousands of Muslims are dead and occupied two countries. Not exactly the way they wanted. But then cters here believe that AQ works for the CIA so we don't need to talk about this.

Originally posted by nyk537

Originally posted by mybigunit
We tick these guys off when we get in their business and occupy their lands.

Oh really?

So these radical Islamists never had a problem with us before the war in Iraq?

Sure they did they bombed us in Lebonon when Reagan was president but once again what the hell were we doing over there in the first place? If we werent there we wouldnt of been bombed would be?

The Iranian Hostage crisis which once again was because we overthrew Irans democratically elected government and inserted the Shah who made Sadam look like Mr Rogers. When the Shah was overthrown and they found out about us putting him in there the hostage situation occurred.

They bombed the Cole once again why the hell is our military in their lands. If Russia had their ships over here would would throw a bomb or two at them wouldnt we?

We need to stay out of their business. We should of let them handle Iraq like they wanted to and we need to get out of this we need to police the world mentality or American Exceptionalism as it is called. We cant afford it because we are bankrupt and its not our job.



Edit to add: Our insertion and backing of Israel doesnt help either. In my opinion Israel through two war victories has won the land they are on but doesnt mean people dont hold resentment and doesnt mean that it wont cause wars in the future. Doesnt mean we need to go and fight their battles either. They want the land so bad then let them fight for it like they have in the past.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by mybigunit]