HELL created to sell church seats?

Their is a CONsept that is pushed by zelot religions that if you don't listen to them correctly you'll be punished forever and a day. The Christ Stain religion has many things confused including the understanding of what "hell" is and what it is for.

You might be glad to hear HELL doesn't exist, judging by many of your actions, this should come as good news to many of you.



Hell is a misconseptual understanding of hades. Hades is real. It is the holding station, of a sort, after the physical death, where the soul can clearly see the errors it's made in life.

After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

Originally posted by Incarnated
After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

This is a concept from the Urantia Book? I believe I recall something similar.

You believe "unworthy" souls are reabsorbed, as it were, by their Creator? Is this supposed to be a form of punishment?

Originally posted by Incarnated

You might be glad to hear HELL doesn't exist, judging by many of your actions, this should come as good news to many of you.

:Hell is a misconseptual understanding of hades. Hades is real. It is the holding station, of a sort, after the physical death, where the soul can clearly see the errors it's made in life.

So you are basing this on

another religion?

Or, as you have said before, the fact you are an angel.

After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

Your angel name has Christian roots. The passage in your avatar is Christian. What you just described is familiar to Christianity.

But you said 'Christ stain religion', and refer to Greek mythology as more factual... How do you bridge this dissonance!?

[edit on 18-11-2008 by Lucid Lunacy]

reply to post by Incarnated


Did you at any time consider informing the vatican about your discovery? as I'm sure one hell (scuse pun) of a lot of people will want their money refunded

Originally posted by Incarnated
After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

Rather like, if thine eye offends thee? But then this assumes the eye acts of its own accord, and that it is somehow apart from the whole.

How can anything that is a part of us can be apart from us? So how can anything that is a part of the creation be apart from its creator?

reply to post by Incarnated

Hi, Incarnated,

It sounds to me as if maybe you have had some knowledge revealed to you. The kind of knowledge that Jesus alluded to in this verse: I have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. John 16:12

Would that be so? That, if you have revealed knowledge, that it is the sort that Christians on the "milk" of the message cannot bear?

Hell is a misconseptual understanding of hades. Hades is real. It is the holding station, of a sort, after the physical death, where the soul can clearly see the errors it's made in life.

This sounds a lot like the description of Gehenna.

There are other types of hell: Sheol and Tartarus (also spelled Tartaros). What is your take, or understanding, of them?

And, after the "time of holding in that station", then what?

After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

Not that I am in total disagreement with you, but I have the opinion that God wrote (figuratively speaking) the books of science and what you said goes against scientific findings in that energy cannot be destroyed only transformed.

So, is there more to your premise than what you stated?

Thanks







[edit on 18-11-2008 by L.I.B.]

Originally posted by argilla11

Originally posted by Incarnated
After the harvesting of the planet those beings that are not worth moving foward are just distroyed, and that is the second death.

This is a concept from the Urantia Book? I believe I recall something similar.

You believe "unworthy" souls are reabsorbed, as it were, by their Creator? Is this supposed to be a form of punishment?

I don't see it as a form of punishment. I see it as God has many ideas. Not unlike you might have many ideas in your head. You might think you're hungry and want to achieve eating something. You might have bad throught of how you can acchieve this goal of eating. Hopefully you realize stealing and killing to gain food for yourself is out of line with goal achievement. So then you get that thought and you rid your mind of it. This is how I see life extingishment. It isn't a punshment is't a realization that the idea was bad.

Originally posted by L.I.B.
reply to post by Incarnated

 

Not that I am in total disagreement with you, but I have the opinion that God wrote (figuratively speaking) the books of science and what you said goes against scientific findings in that energy cannot be destroyed only transformed.

So, is there more to your premise than what you stated?

Not that I am in compleat agreeance with the "scientific findings" of mankind, because man has had very little time to review and refine, but according to that understanding from of thinking.

You, the personality that makes up your being, and not excluding all the "you" personalities of the world, are not only just energy. Energy as understood by mankind has cycles. Like the Human mind is assumed to work on several mental bioelectircal energies established/names Alpha waves, Beta waves and so on. A personality isn't therefore the energy but the adding up of several energy cycles within a human personality.

So that like a phenomenon may be several events tied toget by a common function, a "soul" or being of survival potential isn't a "energy" but a package of energies or cycle forms that make up an original signature.

You could also look at this as symbols, where the enegry cycles are equate to letters of an alphabet. If I put the right string of reconized symbols together you get a word that is common in understanding. However if I put several symbols that make no sense together like doienwekdo that isn't a "word" unless commonly accpeted through some agreed meaning on some new statement. However most common is the fact that when some doienwekdo pops up it's quickly realized to be jibberish, wrong, and thus is it broken up.