IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming

a reply to: budski

Your post seem to do nothing but discredit what I wrote based on nothing but BS and completely dodge the issue.

The WSJ article, which was written 6 years by two people known to be affiliated with The Heartland Foundation. The scientist in question is known to be on the payroll of a large oil company.

Heartland Institute wastes real scientists time!

What about his claim that humans are responsible for only a very small fraction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Wrong again. Humans are responsible for approximately 40% of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today. In fact, Goreham makes an elementary-school error by confusing gross emissions with net emissions. This is a mistake that anyone with a bank account can see. It is like the difference between the paycheck deposited in your bank account and the amount of money that remains after paying all of your bills. He also gets confused about how long elevated carbon dioxide will persist in the atmosphere. The high levels of carbon dioxide which results from human emissions will persist for decades and centuries, far longer than the 5-6 year molecule-specific residence time he claims.

a reply to: budski

The OP source is prison planet, home of Alex Jones.

No one wants a carbon tax. That is ultimately what these threads become. I have been a skeptic of GW, however it does appear we are helping trap energy with our pumping CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere.

www.prisonplanet.com...

...all the attention and funding is being lavished upon a manufactured hoax, peddled with the aid of phony data, as governments prepare to suck what’s left out of the middle class and poor with carbon taxes that do nothing to help the environment, while all the real environmental problems are left in the shadows

Sometimes a blind squirrel can find a nut.