It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS, 42 million people around the world are infected with HIV, and nearly 22 million people in Africa have died of AIDS. But AIDS isn't a single disease; it's a collection of diseases. When people are said to die of AIDS, they're known to die of a particular disease or condition, such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, malaria or basic malnutrition. AIDS researchers claim that HIV plays a role in the development of these illnesses, but in spite of this claim, 20 years of AIDS research has failed to prove causation between HIV infection and any so-called AIDS disease (as explored in “The AIDS Debate” parts one and two). So why do we call them AIDS deaths?
In the US, AIDS is defined as a collection of 29 previously-known conditions including yeast infections, hepatitis, the flu, pneumonia, tuberculosis and Kaposi's Sarcoma. These conditions are not known to be caused by HIV. Nevertheless, the one thing that classifies any one of these conditions as AIDS is a positive HIV-antibody test.
But even if HIV was found to cause these previously known conditions, a problem remains. The HIV-antibody tests do not diagnose actual HIV-infection. Instead, they look for non-specific antibody reactions in your blood to proteins in the HIV-test. The test manufacturers claim that the proteins stand in for HIV, but in reality, none of the test proteins have been proven to be specific to HIV. These tests are, in fact, so nonspecific that they cross-react with nearly 70 other documented conditions, including the flu, previous vaccinations, blood transfusions, arthritis, alcoholic hepatitis, drug use, yeast infections and even pregnancy, as well as conditions endemic in Africa: tuberculosis, parasitic infection, leprosy and malaria. Because no HIV test can actually find HIV, not a single HIV-test has been approved by the FDA for diagnosing HIV-infection.
In light of this nonspecific, cross-reacting test, how does the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnose AIDS in Africa?
Simple: they don't require any test at all. In 1985, the WHO created a new definition of AIDS for African nations and third world countries. The WHO's “Bangui Definition” allows Africans with common physical symptoms including diarrhea, fever, weight loss, itching and coughing to be automatically designated as AIDS patients, with no HIV test. But these very symptoms define life for the majority of Africans who lack essentials like sufficient food, safe drinking water, proper sanitation and basic medical care. These symptoms are also synonymous with the biggest killers on the continent: malaria, infectious diarrhea and tuberculosis.
source
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by redled
...We have recognised viruses under microscopes...
Just a minor point, but no one has viewed living viruses under microscope in a VERY long time. Dr. Royal Raymond Rife developed a microscope whereby you could see living viruses, but it lost out to GE's development of the Electron Microscope.
Originally posted by ReelView
I posted this before and got similar kinds of naive responses. What the doctor is pointing out is that what passes for the proof of a virus as a photographed RNA strand turns out to be an unreliable somewhat random product of the junk in the petri dish. With the best equipment and dedicated research he couldn't find a virus and he's not stupid, he's the one in a million that can actually think!
Yes, "something" causes an illness like AIDS for example, but what that is, is not really known. Selling solutions to go with causes is big business, control and extermination. We know that vaccines have been used to claim cures to illness only to cause worse illness. They can't do that if they don't first claim they know what the problem is and have then isolated the solution. They can't be the heros, saviors, deliverers.
There is another guy from Japan with research lead him to believe the body manufactures illness itself. I believe that this is very correct. The idea being that the body seems to be a kind of self generating laboratory that manufactures on demand illnesses suitable to introduce karmic conditions of the individual. Think of it this way, your body and mind are there to facilitate your exhausting imperfections so it's very natural that it would facilitate the introduction of what ever it takes to do that. This maximizes your efforts to exhaust karma from both desires and paybacks. Naturally, people are cowards and not willing to think or understand or face the reality of their existence here. So denial of such likely realities meets with the usual opposition (at least at first).
Originally posted by ReelView
Check out this link -- www.neue-medizin.com...
Seems Viruses may not even exist. Of course, there are communicable illnesses but the label of "Virus" is apparently a tool of you know who for you know what.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by redled
...We have recognised viruses under microscopes...
Just a minor point, but no one has viewed living viruses under microscope in a VERY long time. Dr. Royal Raymond Rife developed a microscope whereby you could see living viruses, but it lost out to GE's development of the Electron Microscope.
Originally posted by predisposed
if one has abundant energy thru qi gong or internal energy cultivation like meditiation, then one will not get ill