posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 07:31 PM
reply to post by Max_TO
Lets just say its going on within the source, I cant say mind, because to me that means some sort of form, what the source is, is ineffable, it is
what it is, and what I stated before, is about as far as I can see going with it, within the realm of describing things with words. Not to be
mistaken, I do however firmly believe that the source can be deeply and coherently understood.
Its like, trying to use english to do math. Or like trying to verbally tell you my name in machine code. The "language" used to understand it,
is not of this dimension. When we speak, we produce quite simple linear thoughts, when source speaks, it does so on infinite levels simultaneously,
at the same time explaining the intricate interactions and interconnectedness of each detail within each level within each layer or grid of
information.
Since your mind, or essence, or whatever, cannot be separated from the source, it only makes perfect sense that it can be understood, but not in
normal 3d terms, for instance, its like trying to look at the entire universe at once, you cant do that with your eyes, because there will always be
space behind you that you cannot see. Your eyes are stuck inside the universe. Similarly, spoken language is VERY limiting in what and how it can
explain things of such a different nature. The "inner eye" however is not limited to what it can see, or experience or understand, although it can
suffer the limitations set forth my mental filters of what is supposedly possible.
These thoughts go along with a concept called macrocosm microcosm, the idea that every point in the universe contains every other point in the
universe. Every point is a miniature version of the universe it is a part of. Combining this philosophy with meditation is how I came to what I
think.