Is HAARP a weapon of mass destruction?

Is there any truth in this youtube vidoe below. If it were true then surely that would make HAARP a weapon of mass distruction - or is this fear mongering??

uk.youtube.com...



[edit on 9-11-2008 by MCoG1980]

I don't know if there is any truth to this or not, but their web site has been down all day today. I usualy look at that site every day, but haven't been able to access their site at all today, seems odd to me. Hmmm?? www.137.229.36.30...



[edit on 10-11-2008 by mcrose]

Does anyone have an opionion on this, i think i just need reassuring that this video is just scare mongering and untrue.

Well...

To tell you the true... no one really knows the full extent of HAARP...

Ive heard about it, and looked into it for years, and i cannot tell you for sure...


Is it a SW... It might be... it might not...

And IF it is a SW... and it works... then yes... it could be pretty scary...

I'm not sure about HAARP. However if it does have military applications it is most likely to be a defensive one as in a shield that can burn up MIRV's reentering the atmosphere over the Arctic, where the majority of a Russian strike would come from.

There's a reason it's built up there in Alaska.

Not saying that it doesn't have offensive capabilities as well.

HAARP has always intrigued me. It does seem to be more than meets the eye.

There have been numerous threads within this site about HAARP. Just search them and read the threads.

There are people here who know the real deal on HAARP and then you have people who will never believe anything that "the man" tells them. You have to come to your own conclusion.

reply to post by hinky


Thanks for that, i couldn't find what i was looking for though: any good threads i can look at?

I first heard of haarp at its conceptual inception more than 20 years ago.

99.999999% of what you will read about haarp is utter rubbish and BS.

Haarp cannot cause earthquakes or destroy the WTC or cause bridges in minnesota to collapse.

The original intent of haarp was to find a way to "lens" military radio communications. By focusing a beam a radio waves at a spot in the high atmosphere the reflectivity patterns of radio waves can be altered.
From what i have read in the past, from reput5able sources like science journals, researchers have been able to extend the range of radio communications far beyond that of their typical broadcast ranges.
It can also be used to keep an enemy from recieving communication by causing the radio waves to reflect in such a way as to not be recievable.

It has also been rumored that the original concept was for tactical battlefield weather modification.
I might have been used in GW2 when a nfreak sand/wind storm blew up and covered the coalitions advance around iraqi defenses.

Stevo here; I think that haarp was used to bring down the I35 bridge in Minneapolis because the bridge had to go to make way for the new North American Union bridge with more lanes to accomodate trucks from mexico to Canada. Moments before the bridge fell the highway camera was shaking pretty good although it may have been windy that day ??. [They] do not care who or what is in the way of [Their] agenda.