It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Youtube Video = Final Proof of Inside Job???

page: 1
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 04:42 PM
link   
Greetings!
im not sure if this video has been posted anywhere else in the forum so forgive me if it has already been discussed but i came across this video on youtube... shows me what seems to be evidence of somethin not so right goin on as far as the planes hitting the building. Most people argue about the collapses (which myself i believe was controlled demolition) but i havnt seen many talking about the planes hitting the towers, any opinions on this video???
thanks!
-sick




posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 04:43 PM
link   
wow... it didnt show up but i can still watch it.. odd?

heres the direct link instead of trying to embed!

www.youtube.com...



posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 05:07 PM
link   
Well, if it was like 5 years ago this video would be interesting.

Loose Change is really old



posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Hm. i have loose change and never saw this particular clip in it. I was just wondering opinions on it.



posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 06:37 PM
link   
Ya, I just love how the plane just melts in the building just like butter notice how nothing falls on impact. I love how the wings just continue to slice through all those support beams, and just think the airplane wings are made of a light aluminum, go figure!



posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 07:15 PM
link   
Yet another 9/11 thread and yet another advisory this board is under close staff scrutiny...

Whats going on? Close CIA scrutiny?

Whatever.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by star in a jar]

[edit on 9-11-2008 by star in a jar]



posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 07:21 PM
link   
This isn't even close to "total proof". Its good as a series of leads for further investigation, but that is all. I've been researching 9/11 video footage for hundreds of hours, and have yet to find "final proof". I've seen proof of especially disgusting manipulation but that is it.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by truthquest]



posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by cashlink
Ya, I just love how the plane just melts in the building just like butter...


Yes, just melts into the building like any ordinary 200,000+ pound stick of butter, traveling over 500mph.



posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 10:26 AM
link   
All I needed to do was read this:

Missile hits world trade center!

I didn't bother wasting more time watching truther videos.

I kind of laughed at the Title though... "FINAL" proof. There hasn't been ANY proof from the 911 truth movement yet.



posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 07:37 PM
link   
Thats why i put the " ? " in it, i thought this site was for people to discuss things, not bash others cause of a question. To everyone that replied without being the turds that wont flush in my toilet, What is your opinions of the VIDEO not the circumstances cause well i think everyone knows something went wrong and that the evidence is there to substantiate that the government/911 commision is either LYING or not telling the truth. So as we see in the video, SOMETHING is on the bottom of that jet, does anyone have any guesses or good speculations to what it could be? thanks for replyin!
-sick



posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 09:34 PM
link   
Norad claimed that Flight 11 was still airborn after the 1st impact.

The naudet video that captured the 1st plane should be treated very suspiciously.

The video clearly shows that the 1st plane was not a boeing 757 or 767 or 737.

A massive disinformation campaign focusing on fligth 175 using extremely stupid theories like missile pods, holograms, tv fakery, etc were all created to dicredit the truth movement while diverting attention away from the naudet's 'lucky shot' of the small plane,1st impact which showed a smaller craft and not Flight 11.

911 seemed to have been puposely planned full of holes and double think/speak as to divert the public from confronting the real evidence while being fed incredible conspiracies from pseudo skeptics who pretend to be truthers and from the offical story.

Kinda like looking for a murderer who shot a guy and then arguing about what he had in his fridge. Bad guy gets away. The ? u should ask is, who keeps diverting the conversation towards the contents of the fridge and not the drivers licence that the killer left behind and are these people aiding the murderer?


[edit on 10-11-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Nov, 10 2008 @ 09:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by SickTanicK


One thing this video is proof of is that the loose change guys are connected and were funded by the missile pod pseudo skeptic fake truth movement who have been accused of being funded by the perpeTRAITORS. These guys play both side of the fence and can see them hard at work as a truther or a debunker right here on ATS and other 'intelligent' discussion forums this very minute.

I have always knew of the loose change guys goal was to 'Lead the opposition". Missile Pods, holograms bla bla bla. Heck these guys are even backdoor friends with Vanity Fair and Popular Mechanics.


[edit on 10-11-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 10-11-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 01:07 AM
link   
reply to post by ThroatYogurt
 


Hey Throaty! You are the only one that saying “MISSILES”!
I do not see anyone else in here saying “MISSILES”. Who said it was a truthers video?
Maybe we need to watch the liars video, would that make you happy. Not everyone that is looking for the truth is in the 911-truth movement.
ThroatYogurt, are you looking for the truth about 911?
If you are then, what movement are you in?



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Ivanzana : i didnt quite understand your post, are you saying that the people who put this video together and the loose change videos together are actually a part of a disinfo group to give 9/11 truth seekers disinformation? please ellaborate, you say that have connections with popular mechanics etc (who is obviously opposed to the truth movement) can you prove this? why would anyone play both sides of the field that makes no sense to me. What im questioning is what the agenda for that would be? if these people are providing proof/opinion on how 9/11 was a inside job, why would they work for the otherside, and why would the government put them on to "disinform" wouldnt the government be struggling to find debunkers rather than people that can give others insight they wouldnt want them to have in the first place?
Thanks!
-Sick



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by cashlink


Hey Throaty! You are the only one that saying “MISSILES”!
I do not see anyone else in here saying “MISSILES”. Who said it was a truthers video?




Did you read the title to the video?

Thanks,

-TY-



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ThroatYogurt
 


I ask you a question, are you looking for the truth of what happened on 911?



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Lets face it though, just because a video has a title that is unappealing or seems out of whack doesnt mean you should pay it no mind, ive come across many videos with some dumb titles and ended up enjoying them or at least figuring out they were stupid. All the same its your choice, i just figured this would be the right place to discuss this and get opinions on the FOOTAGE not the TITLE.
-sick



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by SickTanicK
Lets face it though, just because a video has a title .....-sick


Sorry dont get me wrong. The 1st part of the video is accurate and should be investigated for it proves that it couldnt of been flight 11 but a smaller craft. The trick is to prove something shocking and true to grab your attention and make you believe that these guys are on your side telling the truth then they mix it up with a very stupid debunkable theories that can be later show cased as proving how stupid 911 conspiracies and truthers are.

This is some information i compiled regarding the makers of loosechange, missile pod theories and the debunkers connection with them.



Most Hezbollah sites hosted in U.S.
Companies provide domains, space for Lebanese terror group


.......Most Hezbollah websites are also hosted by American companies. Hosting companies provide space on webservers for the actual site content. Alabanza, Inc. in Baltimore hosts three Hezbollah sites, including the Hezbollah news site Intiqad.com. iPowerWeb, Inc. of Santa Monica, California, hosts Nasrollah.net, Naimkassem.org, Moqawama.tv.

www.worldnetdaily.com...


I would like to focus on IPOWERWEB.


Domain ID
104016492-LROR
Domain Name:LETSROLL911.ORG
Created On:23-Feb-2004 18:30:50 UTC
Last Updated On:21-Feb-2005 19:20:55 UTC
Expiration Date:23-Feb-2006 18:30:50 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Tucows Inc. (R11-LROR)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:tung3O0qWwl2H3Cp
Registrant Name
hil Jayhan
Registrant Email:[email protected]
Name Server:NS1.IPOWERWEB.NET
Name Server:NS1.IPOWERDNS.COM
Phil-Marcus Jayhan-Jump aka Phil_Jayhan, a new collapse specialist, opened a website at letsroll911.org. It focuses mainly on the second WTC-plane, Flight 175

For those of you not familiar with letsroll911, they are the website that started the whole windowless, missile pod firing, hologram, laser guided flight 175 , No plane at the Pentagon, and the Shoot down of flight 93 my Col. Gibny (sic).

Corey rowe and Jason Bermas had their starts at Letsroll911 and Loose Change first edition was partly funded by Jayhan. THe film contained a large section on the missile pod hoax which has been debunked and removed from later editions.
PLEASE SEE Pod People hijack the 9/11 truth movement


In Late 2004, a large concetrated effort came forth from this site promoting the most insane un corroberated theories in the name of 9/11 truth. Many people proved them false only to find themselves banned.
Even then they were being called disinfo artists.


As you can see the topics pushed in late 2004 on letsroll ends up being the main theories debunked in March 2005 by Popular Mechanics."http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html.

What is most interesting is that popular science features letsroll911 as the leading source for 911 truth. Obviously Popular Mechanics debunks all those wild claims such as truthers did before getting banned from the site while making the truth movement look like a bunch of cooks with zero credibility.

As you can see in this next screen grab that Popular Mechanics' Debunking 911 myths is really "Debunking Strawman theories" or debunking Letsroll911.



Step 1: Build the Straw Man
Step 2: Knock down the Straw Man by any means necessary
Step 3: Connect the original position to the Straw Man


So in conclusion it seems that mabey certain conspiracy websites are actually operated by the 911 perps for the use of obsefucating the truth, muddying the waters of truth, misleading people and setting up Straw man theories in the name of 911 truthers so than can easily debunk the wild and baseless theories surrounding 911.


Bush said it best when he said

We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."


-- GW Bush speaking before the UN General Assembly 11/10/2001



Letsroll911 forums are being erased from the internet archives as we speak.



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by cashlink
reply to post by ThroatYogurt
 


I ask you a question, are you looking for the truth of what happened on 911?



That wasn't the only question you asked me:


Originally posted by cashlink

I do not see anyone else in here saying “MISSILES”. Who said it was a truthers video?


I say it's a truthers video. The title of the video was saying missiles.



Originally posted by cashlinkThroatYogurt, are you looking for the truth about 911?
If you are then, what movement are you in?


I did look for the truth. I found it. That's the difference between me & Spike and You & Dora. We asked questions, and we paid attention to the answers.

What questions Cash, have not been answered that you think implicates the United States in these terrorist attacks.



posted on Nov, 11 2008 @ 05:56 PM
link   
reply to post by ThroatYogurt
 



I did look for the truth. I found it.


LOL Oh ya! Where did you find the truth?

Since you “think” you have the truth I know you and spike are not in the 911 threads looking for truth, so why are you in here then?



new topics

top topics



 
1
<<   2 >>

log in

join