It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by azzllinAnd she needs to go back to school, how can someone like this get a job as Governor? is she still the Governor? or did she resign to run for VP?
Originally posted by mopusvindictus
reply to post by lee anoma
She wasn't bro, she was acting, screwing McCain over
I'll back it up in the future i'm so sure of it... she is one serious witch and... I don't blame her either
I remember reading in the first week how his staff wanted her to tow Mccains line and she had issue with that then a few days later "agreed to conform"
They tried to silence her, because of stance on abortion and g-d and other true conservative issues
and I live around the corner from McCain, I drink with these guys, they are sexist and I am certain they all told her to play a game
and LOL she sure did...
If people will believe she is THAT dumb and a person can't throw a few tantrums on purpose...fine, but I know better, I know a Smart womans malice, i'm divorced!!!!!
The Girl is Crafty Like Ice is Cold
Originally posted by ACEMANN But what I am surprised at is that it seems his VP pick cost him the Presidency - on purpose.
Conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch, under the influence of young wife Wendi Deng, is now a huge Obama fan and rumored embarrassed by the boorish partisanship of O'Reilly and Fox News chief Roger Ailes.
When News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch decided to sit down for a rare, on-camera interview, it was of course with two reporters from his own media empire, Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher of the Wall Street Journal. In this clip from the Journal's D conference in Carlsbad, California, Murdoch explains how he thinks the Journal and Times will be competing aggressively with one another on all stories — business, political or otherwise — within just "a few months." He also rants about how it's "ridiculous" that an average of 8.3 editors looks at a typical WSJ story, inevitable expanding it beyond reason. "People don't have time for it — there's not a story that you can't get all the facts in (within) half the space." Also: Murdoch confirms he was involved in the Post's decision to switch its allegiance from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama.
Originally posted by spacedoubt
But I took the Russia comment as nothing more than that it would serve to keep one mindful of a country that not so long ago, was considered enemy number one.
But yes, it did expose her naivete, when dealing with a press that was well prepared to make fools of anyone who was not glazed-over with Obamaphilia.
So until I know who -- who is talking about it, I won't have a comment on false allegations.
Now that's a smart response, she's learning.
Originally posted by Crakeur
according to a new article coming out from Time (I think)... [snip]
Originally posted by spacedoubt
But yes, it did expose her naivete, when dealing with a press that was well prepared to make fools of anyone who was not glazed-over with Obamaphilia.